Literature DB >> 21792563

Differences in the consumption rates and regulatory barriers to the accessibility of strong opioid analgesics in Israel and St. Petersburg.

Alexander M Ponizovsky1, Michael V Pchelintsev, Eli Marom, Edwin E Zvartau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare trends in opioid consumption in Israel and St. Petersburg/Russia (morphine, oxycodone, pethidine, fentanyl, methadone, buprenorphine, trimeperidine, and papaveretum) over the period 2000-2008, and to describe the regulatory barriers to their accessibility as an exploratory variable for between-country differences.
METHODS: Data were drawn from the databases maintained by the Israel Ministry of Health's Pharmaceutical Administration and the St. Petersburg Central Pharmaceutical Reserve. The data were converted into a defined daily dose (DDD)/1,000 inhabitants/day. Regulation was evaluated according to the WHO guidelines for the assessment of national opioid regulation.
RESULTS: The opioid consumption rates in Israel were substantially higher than those in St. Petersburg. The excess in DDD/1,000 inhabitants/day was for fentanyl +0.287 in 2000 and +1.206 in 2008, for morphine +0.245 in 2000 and +0.122 in 2008, and for pethidine/trimeperidine +0.035 in 2000 and +0.007 in 2008. Oxycodone consumption increased in Israel from 0.31 DDD/1,000 inhabitants/day in 2000 to 0.46 DDD/1,000 inhabitants/day in 2008, whereas this analgesic is not available in St. Petersburg. Methadone and buprenorphine consumption rose in Israel, whereas these drugs are not available in Russia. Conversely, omnopon consumption decreased in St. Petersburg from 0.0206 DDD/1,000 inhabitants/day in 2000 to 0.00304 DDD/1,000 inhabitants/day in 2008, whereas the compound is not available in Israel. St. Petersburg differs from Israel with less opioid formulary availability and greater regulatory restrictions.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that strong opioid analgesics consumption rates in St. Petersburg yield those in Israel, and that the between-countries differences in opioid formularies availability and legal and regulatory barriers to opioids accessibility are responsible for the consumption discrepancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21792563     DOI: 10.1007/s00228-011-1099-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  10 in total

1.  Formulary availability and regulatory barriers to accessibility of opioids for cancer pain in Europe: a report from the ESMO/EAPC Opioid Policy Initiative.

Authors:  N I Cherny; J Baselga; F de Conno; L Radbruch
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Trends in the use and abuse of branded and generic extended release oxycodone and fentanyl products in the United States.

Authors:  Theodore J Cicero; James A Inciardi; Hilary Surratt
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Trends in the consumption of opioid analgesics in Spain. Higher increases as fentanyl replaces morphine.

Authors:  Javier Garcia del Pozo; Alfonso Carvajal; Jose Maria Viloria; Alfonso Velasco; Victorina Garcia del Pozo
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Epidemiological trends in abuse and misuse of prescription opioids.

Authors:  Henry Spiller; Douglas J Lorenz; Elise J Bailey; Richard C Dart
Journal:  J Addict Dis       Date:  2009

5.  Barriers to the development of palliative care in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States.

Authors:  Thomas Lynch; David Clark; Carlos Centeno; Javier Rocafort; Luis Alberto Flores; Anthony Greenwood; David Praill; Simon Brasch; Amelia Giordano; Liliana De Lima; Michael Wright
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Trends in opioid analgesics consumption, Israel, 2000-2008.

Authors:  Alexander M Ponizovsky; Eli Marom; Alexander Zeldin; Nathan I Cherny
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Trends in opioid consumption in the Nordic countries 2002-2006.

Authors:  Katri Hamunen; Pirkko Paakkari; Eija Kalso
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 8.  New and emerging analgesics and analgesic technologies for acute pain management.

Authors:  James W Heitz; Thomas A Witkowski; Eugene R Viscusi
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.706

Review 9.  Current developments in opioid therapy for management of cancer pain.

Authors:  Oscar A de Leon-Casasola
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 10.  Opioid analgesics in primary care: challenges and new advances in the management of noncancer pain.

Authors:  Raymond Sinatra
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.657

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Pain is associated with heroin use over time in HIV-infected Russian drinkers.

Authors:  Judith I Tsui; Debbie M Cheng; Sharon M Coleman; Elena Blokhina; Carly Bridden; Evgeny Krupitsky; Jeffrey H Samet
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Pain is associated with risky drinking over time among HIV-infected persons in St. Petersburg, Russia.

Authors:  Judith I Tsui; Debbie M Cheng; Sharon M Coleman; Marlene C Lira; Elena Blokhina; Carly Bridden; Evgeny Krupitsky; Jeffrey H Samet
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Changes in trends and pattern of strong opioid prescribing in primary care.

Authors:  C S Zin; L C Chen; R D Knaggs
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.931

4.  Analgesic Medicine Utilization in Older People in New Zealand from 2005 to 2013.

Authors:  Prasad S Nishtala; Sekbong Oh; Daniel Kim; Natalie Chun; Siti Fatimah Binti Kamis; Kuan-Cia Kiu
Journal:  Drugs Real World Outcomes       Date:  2015-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.