A comparison of surgical complications between immediate breast reconstruction and mastectomy: the impact on delivery of chemotherapy--an analysis of 391 procedures.

PURPOSE: To compare the postoperative complications after immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) versus mastectomy alone and to examine the impact on the delivery of chemotherapy.
METHODS: In this prospective series, there were 391 consecutive women who underwent mastectomy (243 mastectomy alone and 148 mastectomy and IBR). The outcome measures were complications (within 3 months after surgery) and time to adjuvant chemotherapy.
RESULTS: Compared to the IBR group, patients in the mastectomy alone group were significantly older (P < 0.0001), smokers (P = 0.007) and less likely to have had previous radiation or lumpectomy (P < 0.0001). Overall, the complication rate was significantly greater in the IBR group than mastectomy alone (27.0% vs. 15.6%, P = 0.009). Univariate analyses revealed that mastectomy with IBR [odds ratio (OR) = 2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-2.30]; bilateral procedure (OR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.07-3.16); previous radiotherapy (OR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.29-4.47); and previous lumpectomy (OR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.11-3.03) were significant predictors of increased complications. With multivariable analysis, none of these variables were significantly associated with increased complications. 106 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy; median time from mastectomy to chemotherapy was 6.8 (0.71-15) weeks in the mastectomy alone group (n = 96) compared to 8.5 (6.3-11) weeks in the IBR group (n = 10) (P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the incidence of overall and major postoperative complications was higher after IBR than mastectomy alone, there were no significant relationships in the multivariable analysis. IBR was associated with a modest increase in time to chemotherapy that was statistically but not clinically significant.