| Literature DB >> 21792384 |
Yurong Zhang1, Xiulan Zhang, Tamara Hanko Aleong, Esme Fuller-Thomson.
Abstract
Social support promotes greater medical compliance, better immune system functioning and slows the progress of HIV/AIDS. One in every 50 People Living With HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) is Chinese, yet little is known about the impact of HIV/AIDS on social relationships in China. This study compares the characteristics of those who report that HIV/AIDS had a substantial impact versus a modest impact on their social relationships. We obtained data from a survey of 866 PLWHA in rural China, which was conducted in 2006-2007 in the three Chinese provinces with the highest prevalence of HIV/AIDS. Chi-square test and multiple logistic regression were performed. The analysis shows that PLWHA who had full-blown AIDS (OR= 1.53; 95% CI=1.09-2.13) and those who were poor (OR=2.19; 95% CI=1.52-3.16) reported greater impact on their social relationships. The results lay a solid foundation for designing effective policy initiatives and intervention programs aimed at alleviating the impact of HIV/AIDS on social relationships and improving the quality of life of PLWHA.Entities:
Keywords: China; HIV/AIDS; developing world; social relationships; social support.
Year: 2011 PMID: 21792384 PMCID: PMC3141326 DOI: 10.2174/1874613601105010067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open AIDS J ISSN: 1874-6136
The Impact of HIV/AIDS on Social Relationships by the Characteristics of Persons Living with HIV/AIDS in Rural China
| N (%) | With Relatives and/or Friends | With Neighbors | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Limited (N=424, 49.1%) | Subst. (N=439,50.9%) | p-Value | Limited (N=541,62.7%) | Subst. (N=322, 37.3%) | p-Value | ||
| Gender | 0.24 | 0.86 | |||||
| Male | 415 (47.9%) | 49.8% | 45.8% | 47.5% | 48.1% | ||
| Female | 451 (52.1%) | 50.2% | 54.2% | 52.5% | 51.9% | ||
| Education Level | 0.30 | 0.82 | |||||
| Illiterate | 286 (33.1%) | 30.7% | 35.6% | 33.3% | 33.0% | ||
| Primary school | 411 (47.5%) | 49.3% | 45.7% | 46.8% | 48.6% | ||
| Above primary school | 168 (19.4%) | 20.0% | 18.7% | 20.0% | 18.4% | ||
| Marital status | 0.36 | 0.85 | |||||
| Married | 618 (71.4%) | 70.0% | 72.9% | 71.7% | 71.1% | ||
| Unmarried | 248 (28.6%) | 30.0% | 27.1% | 28.3% | 28.9% | ||
| Age by decade, year | 0.01 | 0.03 | |||||
| 20-29 | 67 (7.7%) | 9.4% | 5.7% | 7.6% | 7.5% | ||
| 30-39 | 291 (33.6%) | 34.7% | 32.6% | 33.8% | 33.2% | ||
| 40-49 | 323 (37.3%) | 37.5% | 37.4% | 38.6% | 35.4% | ||
| 50-59 | 147 (17.0%) | 13.2% | 20.7% | 14.4% | 21.4% | ||
| ≥60 | 38 (4.4%) | 5.2% | 3.6% | 5.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Time since diagnosis, year | 0.32 | 0.69 | |||||
| ≤2 | 27 (3.1%) | 4.0% | 2.3% | 3.5% | 2.5% | ||
| 3-6 | 653 (76.0%) | 75.8% | 76.2% | 75.8% | 76.3% | ||
| ≥7 | 179 (20.8%) | 20.2% | 21.5% | 20.7% | 21.2% | ||
| Clinical stage | 0.00 | 0.01 | |||||
| HIV | 639 (73.8%) | 78.3% | 69.2% | 76.9% | 68.3% | ||
| AIDS | 227 (26.2%) | 21.7% | 30.8% | 23.1% | 31.7% | ||
| Income | 0.00 | 0.04 | |||||
| Low | 288 (33.3%) | 25.9% | 40.3% | 31.4% | 36.3% | ||
| Middle | 289 (33.4%) | 31.8% | 35.1% | 32.2% | 35.7% | ||
| High | 289 (33.4%) | 42.2% | 24.6% | 36.4% | 28.0% | ||
| Living conditions comparing | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| Similar to others | 170 (20.1%) | 26.8% | 13.5% | 23.4% | 14.5% | ||
| A lit lower than others | 225 (26.6%) | 27.5% | 25.7% | 27.6% | 24.7% | ||
| Much lower than others | 451 (53.3%) | 45.7% | 60.8% | 49.0% | 60.9% | ||
| Status of relationship with neighbors | NA | 0.00 | |||||
| Neighbors do not provide any assistance | 95 (11.3%) | 7.5% | 18.2% | ||||
| Neighbors may provide | 162 (19.3%) | 14.0% | 28.7% | ||||
| Some neighbors provide regular assistance | 262 (31.2%) | 31.2% | 31.4% | ||||
| Most neighbors provide regular assistance | 321 (38.2%) | 47.4% | 21.8% | ||||
Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis of Reporting the Impact of HIV/AIDS on Social Relationships Among PLWHA (n=866)
| with Relatives and/or Friends | with Neighbors | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Odds Ratio | 95% CI | Odds Ratio | 95% CI | ||
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 1.00 | Reference | 1.00 | Reference | ||
| Female | 0.90 | 0.66-1.24 | 0.52 | 0.82 | 0.59-1.14 | 0.23 |
| Education Level | ||||||
| Illiterate | 1.00 | Reference | 1.00 | Reference | ||
| Primary school | 0.89 | 0.63-1.26 | 0.51 | 1.07 | 0.75-1.53 | 0.72 |
| Above Primary school | 0.93 | 0.60-1.45 | 0.75 | 0.96 | 0.61-1.50 | 0.84 |
| Marital status | ||||||
| Unmarried | 1.00 | Reference | 1.00 | Reference | ||
| Married | 1.27 | 0.91-1.78 | 0.16 | 1.15 | 0.82-1.63 | 0.42 |
| Age by decade, yr | ||||||
| 20-29 | 1.00 | Reference | 1.00 | Reference | ||
| 30-39 | 1.37 | 0.73-2.59 | 0.32 | 1.01 | 0.53-1.91 | 0.98 |
| 40-49 | 1.50 | 0.79-2.84 | 0.21 | 1.01 | 0.53-1.92 | 0.98 |
| 50-59 | 2.37 | 1.18-4.77 | 0.01 | 1.75 | 0.87-3.51 | 0.11 |
| ≥60 | 1.01 | 0.41-2.48 | 0.98 | 0.49 | 0.18-1.34 | 0.16 |
| Income (per capita) | ||||||
| High | 1.00 | Reference | 1.00 | Reference | ||
| Low | 2.19 | 1.52-3.16 | 0.00 | 1.27 | 0.87-1.85 | 0.20 |
| Middle | 1.69 | 1.19-2.41 | 0.004 | 1.30 | 0.90-1.87 | 0.16 |
| Living conditions comparing to other families in the village | ||||||
| Similar to others | 1.00 | Reference | 1.00 | Reference | ||
| Much lower than others | 2.18 | 1.47-3.24 | 0.00 | 1.93 | 1.27-2.93 | 0.002 |
| A lit lower than others | 1.76 | 1.15-2.70 | 0.01 | 1.50 | 0.95-2.36 | 0.08 |
| Clinical stage | ||||||
| HIV | 1.00 | Reference | 1.00 | Reference | ||
| AIDS | 1.53 | 1.09-2.13 | 0.013 | 1.62 | 1.16-2.25 | 0.005 |
p≤0.05
p≤0.01
p≤0.001.