Literature DB >> 21792224

Is floral divergence sufficient to maintain species boundaries upon secondary contact in Mediterranean food-deceptive orchids?

A Zitari1, G Scopece, A N Helal, A Widmer, S Cozzolino.   

Abstract

Analyzing the processes that determine whether species boundaries are maintained on secondary contact may shed light on the early phase of speciation. In Anacamptis morio and Anacamptis longicornu, two Mediterranean orchid sister-species, we used molecular and morphological analyses, together with estimates of pollination success and experimental crosses, to assess whether floral isolation can shelter the species' genomes from genetic admixture on secondary contact. We found substantial genetic and morphological homogenization in sympatric populations in combination with an apparent lack of postmating isolation. We further detected asymmetric introgression in the sympatric populations and an imbalance in cytotype representation, which may be due either to a difference in flowering phenology or else be a consequence of cytonuclear incompatibilities. Estimates of genetic clines for markers across sympatric zones revealed markers that significantly deviated from neutral expectations. We observed a significant correlation between spur length and reproductive success in sympatric populations, which may suggest that directional selection is the main cause of morphological differentiation in this species pair. Our results suggest that allopatric divergence has not led to the evolution of sufficient reproductive isolation to prevent genomic admixture on secondary contact in this orchid species pair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21792224      PMCID: PMC3282385          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2011.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  24 in total

Review 1.  Speciation, hybrid zones and phylogeography - or seeing genes in space and time.

Authors:  G M Hewitt
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A Bayesian approach to inferring population structure from dominant markers.

Authors:  Kent E Holsinger; Paul O Lewis; Dipak K Dey
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 4.  Hybrid necrosis: autoimmunity as a potential gene-flow barrier in plant species.

Authors:  Kirsten Bomblies; Detlef Weigel
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Patterns of reproductive isolation in Mediterranean deceptive orchids.

Authors:  Giovanni Scopece; Aldo Musacchio; Alex Widmer; Salvatore Cozzolino
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 6.  Plant speciation.

Authors:  Loren H Rieseberg; John H Willis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Variation in frequency of hybrids and spatial structure among Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) contact sites.

Authors:  George Aldridge
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 10.151

8.  The strength of reproductive isolation in two hybridizing food-deceptive orchid species.

Authors:  Maria Domenica Moccia; Alex Widmer; Salvatore Cozzolino
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Variability in floral scent in rewarding and deceptive orchids: the signature of pollinator-imposed selection?

Authors:  Charlotte C Salzmann; Antonio M Nardella; Salvatore Cozzolino; Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  A powerful regression-based method for admixture mapping of isolation across the genome of hybrids.

Authors:  Zachariah Gompert; C Alex Buerkle
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  8 in total

1.  Transitions between self-compatibility and self-incompatibility and the evolution of reproductive isolation in the large and diverse tropical genus Dendrobium (Orchidaceae).

Authors:  Fabio Pinheiro; Donata Cafasso; Salvatore Cozzolino; Giovanni Scopece
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 2.  Divergence with gene flow within the recent chipmunk radiation (Tamias).

Authors:  J Sullivan; J R Demboski; K C Bell; S Hird; B Sarver; N Reid; J M Good
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Sympatric reinforcement of reproductive barriers between Neotinea tridentata and N. ustulata (Orchidaceae).

Authors:  Giuseppe Pellegrino
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.629

4.  Continuation of the genetic divergence of ecological speciation by spatial environmental heterogeneity in island endemic plants.

Authors:  Bing-Hong Huang; Chih-Wei Huang; Chia-Lung Huang; Pei-Chun Liao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A comparison of reproductive isolation between two closely related oak species in zones of recent and ancient secondary contact.

Authors:  Wan-Jin Liao; Bi-Ru Zhu; Yue-Fei Li; Xiao-Meng Li; Yan-Fei Zeng; Da-Yong Zhang
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Asymmetric gene introgression in two closely related Orchis species: evidence from morphometric and genetic analyses.

Authors:  Hans Jacquemyn; Rein Brys; Olivier Honnay; Isabel Roldán-Ruiz
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Genetic structure is associated with phenotypic divergence in floral traits and reproductive investment in a high-altitude orchid from the Iron Quadrangle, southeastern Brazil.

Authors:  Bruno Leles; Anderson V Chaves; Philip Russo; João A N Batista; Maria Bernadete Lovato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Fluctuating selection across years and phenotypic variation in food-deceptive orchids.

Authors:  Giovanni Scopece; Nicolas Juillet; Christian Lexer; Salvatore Cozzolino
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.