Literature DB >> 21791733

Investigation of voxel warping and energy mapping approaches for fast 4D Monte Carlo dose calculations in deformed geometries using VMC++.

Emily Heath1, Frederic Tessier, Iwan Kawrakow.   

Abstract

A new deformable geometry class for the VMC++ Monte Carlo code was implemented based on the voxel warping method. Alternative geometries which use tetrahedral sub-elements were implemented and efficiency improvements investigated. A new energy mapping method, based on calculating the volume overlap between deformed reference dose grid and the target dose grid, was also developed. Dose calculations using both the voxel warping and energy mapping methods were compared in simple phantoms as well as a patient geometry. The new deformed geometry implementation in VMC++ increased calculation times by approximately a factor of 6 compared to standard VMC++ calculations in rectilinear geometries. However, the tetrahedron-based geometries were found to improve computational efficiency, relative to the dodecahedron-based geometry, by a factor of 2. When an exact transformation between the reference and target geometries was provided, the voxel and energy warping methods produced identical results. However, when the transformation is not exact, there were discrepancies in the energy deposited on the target geometry which lead to significant differences in the dose calculated by the two methods. Preliminary investigations indicate that these energy differences may correlate with registration errors; however, further work is needed to determine the usefulness of this metric for quantifying registration accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21791733     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/16/007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  A method to evaluate dose errors introduced by dose mapping processes for mass conserving deformations.

Authors:  C Yan; G Hugo; F J Salguero; N Saleh-Sayah; E Weiss; W C Sleeman; J V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Improving radiotherapy planning, delivery accuracy, and normal tissue sparing using cutting edge technologies.

Authors:  Carri K Glide-Hurst; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Direct dose mapping versus energy/mass transfer mapping for 4D dose accumulation: fundamental differences and dosimetric consequences.

Authors:  Haisen S Li; Hualiang Zhong; Jinkoo Kim; Carri Glide-Hurst; Misbah Gulam; Teamour S Nurushev; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Evaluation of dose prediction error and optimization convergence error in four-dimensional inverse planning of robotic stereotactic lung radiotherapy.

Authors:  Mark K H Chan; Dora L W Kwong; Anthony Tong; Eric Tam; Sherry C Y Ng
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Accuracy and sensitivity of four-dimensional dose calculation to systematic motion variability in stereotatic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung cancer.

Authors:  Mark K H Chan; Dora L W Kwong; Sherry C Y Ng; Anthony S M Tong; Eric K W Tam
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Dosimetric evaluation of four-dimensional dose distributions of CyberKnife and volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy in stereotactic body lung radiotherapy.

Authors:  Mark K H Chan; Dora L W Kwong; Gilbert M L Law; Eric Tam; Anthony Tong; Venus Lee; Sherry C Y Ng
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Real-time energy/mass transfer mapping for online 4D dose reconstruction.

Authors:  Peter Ziegenhein; Cornelis Ph Kamerling; Martin F Fast; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.