Literature DB >> 21791636

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and its role in assessing the value of new cancer treatments in England and Wales.

Rebecca Trowman1, Helen Chung, Carole Longson, Peter Littlejohns, Peter Clark.   

Abstract

The boundaries of medical science in the treatment of cancer are constantly extending. Developments of existing treatments, innovative approaches, new discoveries, and more targeted therapeutic options are translating into practice. With advances come increasing costs, often of a magnitude that stretches finite financial resources. When decisions about funding are made on behalf of a population, standardized processes and methods are needed in order to produce robust guidance in a fair, consistent, and transparent way. The challenges of making these difficult decisions are brought into particularly stark relief when potentially life-extending treatments for patients with a short life expectancy are appraised. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) produces guidance on the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of medicines compared with current standard practice. Approximately 40% of the technologies appraised by NICE are indicated for cancer, and the majority of these are pharmaceuticals, mostly biological agents. This article provides an overview of the current role of NICE in making new technologies for cancer available in England and Wales. This includes a summary of experiences with end-of-life treatments and the supplementary advice regarding such treatments that was issued by NICE to its decision-making committees in 2009. ©2011 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21791636     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  5 in total

Review 1.  Market access of cancer drugs in European countries: improving resource allocation.

Authors:  Kim Pauwels; Isabelle Huys; Minne Casteels; Katelijne De Nys; Steven Simoens
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.493

2.  Alignment of practice guidelines with targeted-therapy drug funding policies in Ontario.

Authors:  R Ramjeesingh; R M Meyer; M Brouwers; B E Chen; C M Booth
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  Drug development and clinical trials--the path to an approved cancer drug.

Authors:  Eric H Rubin; D Gary Gilliland
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 4.  Importance of cost-effectiveness and value in cancer care and healthcare policy.

Authors:  Ravinder Kang; Philip P Goodney; Sandra L Wong
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 5.  Using health technology assessment to assess the value of new medicines: results of a systematic review and expert consultation across eight European countries.

Authors:  Aris Angelis; Ansgar Lange; Panos Kanavos
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-03-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.