Literature DB >> 21791350

Outcomes and complications after 532 nm laser prostatectomy in anticoagulated patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Doreen E Chung1, James S Wysock, Richard K Lee, Scott R Melamed, Steven A Kaplan, Alexis E Te.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients on anticoagulation are at high risk for bleeding after electrocautery transurethral resection of the prostate or open prostatectomy and they are often denied surgery for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Using photoselective vaporization of the prostate, patients at high risk may safely undergo surgery. We explored outcomes and complications after photoselective vaporization of the prostate in an anticoagulated, high risk cohort.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2002 and 2008, 162 men on systemic anticoagulation underwent photoselective vaporization of the prostate. Data were collected on demographics, comorbidities, complications, serum sodium, hematocrit, maximum flow rate, post-void residual urine, International Prostate Symptom Score and complications.
RESULTS: Mean±SD age was 72±8 years, mean baseline prostate volume was 91±49 gm and mean prostate specific antigen was 4.1±5 ng/ml. Of the patients 31 (19%) were on warfarin, 101 (62%) were on acetylsalicylic acid, 19 (12%) were on clopidogrel and 11 (7%) were on 2 or more anticoagulants. Median American Society of Anesthesiologists class was 3 and mean Charlson comorbidity index was 5. Median operative time was 105 minutes and mean energy use was 280±168 kJ. The immediate mean hematocrit decrease was 1.94%±2.42%. One patient who received excessive intravenous fluids experienced heart failure. Complications within 30 days included urinary tract infection in 4 patients (2.5%) and delayed bleeding in 6 (4%). Three of these patients (50%) required blood transfusion and 1 (17%) required reoperation. In 2 years of followup 3 patients (2%) required repeat photoselective vaporization of the prostate. No incontinence or urethral stricture developed. Significant improvements occurred in International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum flow rate and post-void residual urine.
CONCLUSIONS: Results support using 532 nm photoselective vaporization of the prostate in patients at high risk on systemic anticoagulation, even those on 2 or more anticoagulation agents and with a large prostate requiring longer operative time. Few complications developed and significant durable clinical improvement was seen.
Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21791350     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  20 in total

1.  Absorption of irrigation fluid during XPS™ GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate: results from a prospective breath ethanol monitoring study.

Authors:  Marian S Wettstein; Cédric Poyet; Nico C Grossmann; Christian D Fankhauser; Etienne X Keller; Marko Kozomara; Salome Meyer; Tullio Sulser; Alexander Müller; Thomas Hermanns
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Efficacy and safety of prostate vaporesection using a 120-W 2-μm continuous-wave Tm:YAG laser (RevoLix 2) in patients on continuous oral anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy.

Authors:  Luciano Macchione; Giuseppe Mucciardi; Alessandro Gali'; Antonina Di Benedetto; Salvatore Butticè; Carlo Magno
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Safety and effectiveness of Thulium VapoEnucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) in patients on anticoagulant therapy.

Authors:  Christopher Netsch; M Stoehrer; M Brüning; A Gabuev; T Bach; T R W Herrmann; A J Gross
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Photoselective vaporization of the prostate: study outcomes as a function of risk of bias, conflicts of interest, and industrial sponsorship.

Authors:  Marian S Wettstein; Clinsy Pazhepurackel; Aline S Neumann; Dixon T S Woon; Jaime O Herrera-Caceres; Marko Kozomara; Cédric Poyet; Tullio Sulser; Girish S Kulkarni; Thomas Hermanns
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Role of lasers in urology.

Authors:  Stephan M Korn; Nicolai A Hübner; Christian Seitz; Shahrokh F Shariat; Harun Fajkovic
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  [Laservaporization of the prostate: current status of the greenlight and diode laser].

Authors:  M Rieken; A Bachmann; C Gratzke
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Comparison of patients undergoing laser vaporization of the prostate versus TURP using the ACS-NSQIP database.

Authors:  R D Malik; C E Wang; B Lapin; G S Gerber; B T Helfand
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.554

8.  Population based trends in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Florian R Schroeck; John M Hollingsworth; Samuel R Kaufman; Brent K Hollenbeck; John T Wei
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Comparison of Patients Undergoing PVP Versus TURP for LUTS/BPH.

Authors:  Blake B Anderson; Joseph J Pariser; Brian T Helfand
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Reasons to believe in vaporization: a review of the benefits of photo-selective and transurethral vaporization.

Authors:  Russell N Schwartz; Felix Couture; Iman Sadri; Adel Arezki; David-Dan Nguyen; Ahmed S Zakaria; Kyle Law; Dean Elterman; Malte Rieken; Hannes Cash; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.