Literature DB >> 21791194

Plerixafor added to chemotherapy plus G-CSF is safe and allows adequate PBSC collection in predicted poor mobilizer patients with multiple myeloma or lymphoma.

Immacolata Attolico1, Vincenzo Pavone, Angelo Ostuni, Bernardo Rossini, Maurizio Musso, Alessandra Crescimanno, Massimo Martino, Pasquale Iacopino, Giuseppe Milone, Patrizia Tedeschi, Sabrina Coluzzi, Roberta Nuccorini, Sara Pascale, Elvira Di Nardo, Attilio Olivieri.   

Abstract

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of plerixafor, subsequent to disease-specific chemotherapy followed by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), in 37 multiple myeloma (MM) or lymphoma patients, who were candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) predicted as poor mobilizers (PMs). Patients were identified as predicted PMs according to the history of a previously failed mobilization attempt or the presence of ≥1 factors predicting an unsuccessful harvest, such as advanced disease, prior extensive radiotherapy, or prolonged treatment, with stem cell poisons, advanced age, or extensive bone marrow involvement. Plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg) was administered subcutaneously for up to 3 consecutive days while continuing G-CSF for 9 to 11 hours before the planned apheresis. Plerixafor administration was safe and no significant adverse events were recorded. We observed a median 4-fold increase (range: 1.4-32) in the number of circulating CD34(+) cells following plerixafor compared with baseline CD34(+) cell concentration (from a median of 5 cells/μL, range: 1-32, to a median of 32 cells/μL, range: 6-201). Twenty-seven of the 37 patients (14 of 17 with MM and 13 of 20 with lymphoma) had ≥2×10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg collected in 1-3 apheretic procedures. Of the 27 patients rescued with plerixafor, 24 (13 MM, 11 lymphoma) have been transplanted with plerixafor-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells, showing a rapid and durable hematologic recovery. Our results suggest that the addition of plerixafor to G-CSF after disease-oriented chemotherapy is safe and allows for a satisfactory harvest in order to perform a safe ASCT, in a relevant proportion of lymphoma and MM patients considered to be PMs.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21791194     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  17 in total

1.  Upfront plerixafor plus G-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF for stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: efficacy and cost analysis study.

Authors:  S Afifi; N G Adel; S Devlin; E Duck; J Vanak; H Landau; D J Chung; N Lendvai; A Lesokhin; N Korde; L Reich; O Landgren; S Giralt; H Hassoun
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 2.  Autologous haematopoietic stem cell mobilisation in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients: a position statement from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Authors:  M Mohty; K Hübel; N Kröger; M Aljurf; J Apperley; G W Basak; A Bazarbachi; K Douglas; I Gabriel; L Garderet; C Geraldes; O Jaksic; M W Kattan; Z Koristek; F Lanza; R M Lemoli; L Mendeleeva; G Mikala; N Mikhailova; A Nagler; H C Schouten; D Selleslag; S Suciu; A Sureda; N Worel; P Wuchter; C Chabannon; R F Duarte
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  The timing of plerixafor addition to G-Csf and chemotherapy affects immunological recovery after autologous stem cell transplant in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Antonio Curti; Roberto M Lemoli; Giulia Tolomelli; Katia Mancuso; Paola Tacchetti; Francesca Patriarca; Monica Galli; Lucia Pantani; Beatrice Zannetti; Maria Rosa Motta; Simonetta Rizzi; Elisa Dan; Barbara Sinigaglia; Valeria Giudice; Andrea Olmo; Mario Arpinati; Gabriella Chirumbolo; Renato Fanin; Russell E Lewis; Laura Paris; Francesca Bonifazi; Michele Cavo
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 5.483

4.  Plerixafor 'on demand': results of a strategy based on peripheral blood CD34+ cells in lymphoma patients at first or subsequent mobilization with chemotherapy+G-CSF.

Authors:  L Farina; A Guidetti; F Spina; L Roncari; P Longoni; F Ravagnani; C Carlo-Stella; P Corradini
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Early measurement of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood after cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment predicts later CD34+ mobilisation failure and is a possible criterion for guiding "on demand" use of plerixafor.

Authors:  Giuseppe Milone; Giovanni Tripepi; Massimo Martino; Flavia Ancora; Benedetta Bartolozzi; Andrea Spadaro; Chiara Nozzoli; Alessia La Fauci; Irene Amico; Salvatore Leotta; Massimo Poidomani; Giuseppe Irrera; Pasquale Iacopino; Riccardo Saccardi; Stefano Guidi; Alberto Bosi
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 6.  Successful mobilisation of peripheral blood stem cells in children using plerixafor: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Angelo Gardellini; Aleksandra Babic; Federica Gigli; Sarah Jane Liptrott; Giovanni Martinelli; Daniele Laszlo
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 7.  Targeting the molecular and cellular interactions of the bone marrow niche in immunologic disease.

Authors:  Jaime M Brozowski; Matthew J Billard; Teresa K Tarrant
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.806

8.  An effective mobilization strategy for lymphoma patients after failed upfront mobilization with plerixafor.

Authors:  B M Haverkos; A McBride; L O'Donnell; D Scholl; B Whittaker; S Vasu; S Penza; L A Andritsos; S M Devine; S M Jaglowski
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 5.483

9.  G-CSF plus preemptive plerixafor vs hyperfractionated CY plus G-CSF for autologous stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: effectiveness, safety and cost analysis.

Authors:  A Antar; Z K Otrock; M A Kharfan-Dabaja; H A Ghaddara; N Kreidieh; R Mahfouz; A Bazarbachi
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 10.  A plerixafor-based strategy allows adequate hematopoietic stem cell collection in poor mobilizers: results from the Canadian Special Access Program.

Authors:  D Sheppard; C Bredeson; L Huebsch; D Allan; J Tay
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 5.483

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.