REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY: The frequency of recurrent colic in the UK equine general practice population is previously unreported. Elucidating risk factors for recurrent colic could provide a basis for clinical decision making and interventions. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence rate of and risk factors for recurrent colic. HYPOTHESES: Horse management, prophylactic health care and innate behaviour contribute to the risk of recurrent colic. METHODS: A cohort of 127 horses was enrolled at the point of a veterinary-diagnosed medical colic episode. Participating owners completed a baseline and 3 follow-up telephone questionnaires over one year. Clinical details of each colic episode were collected with data on management, behaviour and preventive healthcare. Incidence was calculated using time at risk data; non-time varying covariates were assessed for association with recurrent colic using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The recurrence rate was 50 colic events/100 horse years at risk (HYAR). Including only veterinary attended recurrent colic episodes the incidence was 35 colic events per 100 HYAR. A multivariable logistic regression model was built to explore non-time varying risk factors for recurrence collected from baseline data. The model showed that horses that have a known dental problem (OR 5.5, 95% CI 1.3, 23.1) or crib-bite/windsuck (OR 12.1, 95% CI 1.4, 108.1) were at increased risk of recurrence during the year following a colic event. CONCLUSIONS AND POTENTIAL RELEVANCE: The incidence of recurrence in horses following a medical episode of colic is high in this population and represents a welfare concern. The incidence rate can be used to compare intervention efficacy in similar populations. Identified risk factors could provide the basis for management interventions or highlight at risk individuals.
REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY: The frequency of recurrent colic in the UK equine general practice population is previously unreported. Elucidating risk factors for recurrent colic could provide a basis for clinical decision making and interventions. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence rate of and risk factors for recurrent colic. HYPOTHESES: Horse management, prophylactic health care and innate behaviour contribute to the risk of recurrent colic. METHODS: A cohort of 127 horses was enrolled at the point of a veterinary-diagnosed medical colic episode. Participating owners completed a baseline and 3 follow-up telephone questionnaires over one year. Clinical details of each colic episode were collected with data on management, behaviour and preventive healthcare. Incidence was calculated using time at risk data; non-time varying covariates were assessed for association with recurrent colic using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The recurrence rate was 50 colic events/100 horse years at risk (HYAR). Including only veterinary attended recurrent colic episodes the incidence was 35 colic events per 100 HYAR. A multivariable logistic regression model was built to explore non-time varying risk factors for recurrence collected from baseline data. The model showed that horses that have a known dental problem (OR 5.5, 95% CI 1.3, 23.1) or crib-bite/windsuck (OR 12.1, 95% CI 1.4, 108.1) were at increased risk of recurrence during the year following a colic event. CONCLUSIONS AND POTENTIAL RELEVANCE: The incidence of recurrence in horses following a medical episode of colic is high in this population and represents a welfare concern. The incidence rate can be used to compare intervention efficacy in similar populations. Identified risk factors could provide the basis for management interventions or highlight at risk individuals.
Authors: A M O'Connor; J M Sargeant; I R Dohoo; H N Erb; M Cevallos; M Egger; A K Ersbøll; S W Martin; L R Nielsen; D L Pearl; D U Pfeiffer; J Sanchez; M E Torrence; H Vigre; C Waldner; M P Ward Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2016-11-07 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Claire E Scantlebury; Elizabeth Perkins; Gina L Pinchbeck; Debra C Archer; Robert M Christley Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2014-07-07 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Laila Curtis; John Harold Burford; Jennifer Sara Marian Thomas; Marise Linda Curran; Tom Curtis Bayes; Gary Crane William England; Sarah Louise Freeman Journal: Acta Vet Scand Date: 2015-10-06 Impact factor: 1.695