Literature DB >> 21790588

Abandonment of high-dose chemotherapy/hematopoietic cell transplants for breast cancer following negative trial results.

David H Howard1, Carolyn Kenline, Hillard M Lazarus, Charles F Lemaistre, Richard T Maziarz, Philip L McCarthy, Susan K Parsons, David Szwajcer, James Douglas Rizzo, Navneet S Majhail.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In 1999, three randomized controlled trials concluded that high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HDC/HCT) is no better than conventional chemotherapy for women with breast cancer. This study documents the impact of the trials on use of HDC/HCT and describes how hospitals reacted to the trials. DATA SOURCE: We used patient-level data on 15,847 HDC/HCTs reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research between 1994 and 2005. STUDY
DESIGN: We report trends in total HDC/HCT procedure volume, compare the time to hospitals' exit from the HDC/HCT market between research and nonresearch hospitals, and document trends in hospital-specific volumes in the 2 years before exit. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: HDC/HCT volume declined from 3,108 in 1998 to 1,363 the year after trial results were released. In 2002, only 76 procedures were performed. Teaching hospitals and the hospitals that participated in the trials were no slower to discontinue the procedure compared with nonteaching, nonparticipating hospitals. At the hospital level, volume declined steadily in the months before abandonment.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that comparative effectiveness research studies that report negative results can reduce spending, but specialists may be reluctant to relinquish cutting-edge technologies. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21790588      PMCID: PMC3393031          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01296.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  17 in total

1.  The controversy over high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplant for breast cancer.

Authors:  M M Mello; T A Brennan
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 2.  High-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  D M Eddy
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Five next steps for a new national program for comparative-effectiveness research.

Authors:  Jordan M VanLare; Patrick H Conway; Harold C Sox
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  The adoption of innovations by provider organizations in health care.

Authors:  Colleen Beecken Rye; John R Kimberly
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.929

5.  High-dose versus standard chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: comparison of Cancer and Leukemia Group B trials with data from the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry.

Authors:  Donald A Berry; Gloria Broadwater; John P Klein; Karen Antman; Joseph Aisner; Jacob Bitran; Mary Costanza; Cesar O Freytes; Edward Stadtmauer; Robert Peter Gale; I Craig Henderson; Hillard M Lazarus; Philip L McCarthy; Larry Norton; Howard Parnes; Andrew Pecora; Michael C Perry; Philip Rowlings; Gary Spitzer; Mary M Horowitz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  High-dose chemotherapy for high-risk primary breast cancer: an on-site review of the Bezwoda study.

Authors:  R B Weiss; R M Rifkin; F M Stewart; R L Theriault; L A Williams; A A Herman; R A Beveridge
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-18       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Advanced breast cancer: high-dose chemotherapy and bone marrow autotransplants.

Authors:  K Antman; R P Gale
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  A randomized trial comparing lung-volume-reduction surgery with medical therapy for severe emphysema.

Authors:  Alfred Fishman; Fernando Martinez; Keith Naunheim; Steven Piantadosi; Robert Wise; Andrew Ries; Gail Weinmann; Douglas E Wood
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Intermittent positive pressure breathing therapy of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A clinical trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  High dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  C Farquhar; J Marjoribanks; R Basser; S Hetrick; A Lethaby
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-07-20
View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  From evidence to clinical practice in blood and marrow transplantation.

Authors:  Nandita Khera
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 8.250

2.  To randomize, or not to randomize, that is the question: using data from prior clinical trials to guide future designs.

Authors:  Alyssa M Vanderbeek; Steffen Ventz; Rifaquat Rahman; Geoffrey Fell; Timothy F Cloughesy; Patrick Y Wen; Lorenzo Trippa; Brian M Alexander
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 3.  The oligometastatic state - separating truth from wishful thinking.

Authors:  David A Palma; Joseph K Salama; Simon S Lo; Suresh Senan; Tom Treasure; Ramaswamy Govindan; Ralph Weichselbaum
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Peer review in hematopoietic cell transplantation: are we doing our fair share?

Authors:  S Giralt; R Korngold; H M Lazarus
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Trends in PCI volume after negative results from the COURAGE trial.

Authors:  David H Howard; Yu-Chu Shen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Transplant indications, guidelines and recommendations: Caveat Emptor.

Authors:  Robert Peter Gale; Giovanni Barosi
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  Policies and Practices to Address Cancer's Long-Term Adverse Consequences.

Authors:  Cathy J Bradley; Sara Kitchen; Smita Bhatia; Julie Bynum; Gwen Darien; J Leonard Lichtenfeld; Randall Oyer; Lawrence N Shulman; Lisa Kennedy Sheldon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 11.816

8.  Trends in use of and survival after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in North America, 1995-2005: significant improvement in survival for lymphoma and myeloma during a period of increasing recipient age.

Authors:  Philip L McCarthy; Theresa Hahn; Anna Hassebroek; Christopher Bredeson; James Gajewski; Gregory Hale; Luis Isola; Hillard M Lazarus; Stephanie J Lee; Charles F Lemaistre; Fausto Loberiza; Richard T Maziarz; J Douglas Rizzo; Steven Joffe; Susan Parsons; Navneet S Majhail
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Translation of Clinical Research into Practice: An Impact Assessment of the Results from the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network Protocol 0201 on Unrelated Graft Source Utilization.

Authors:  Nandita Khera; Lih-Wen Mau; Ellen M Denzen; Christa Meyer; Kate Houg; Stephanie J Lee; Mary M Horowitz; Linda J Burns
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Towards understanding the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices: a scoping review.

Authors:  Daniel J Niven; Kelly J Mrklas; Jessalyn K Holodinsky; Sharon E Straus; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Lianne P Jeffs; Henry Thomas Stelfox
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.