Literature DB >> 21790573

Exploring possible human influences on the evolution of Darwin's finches.

Luis Fernando De León1, Joost A M Raeymaekers, Eldredge Bermingham, Jeffrey Podos, Anthony Herrel, Andrew P Hendry.   

Abstract

Humans are an increasingly common influence on the evolution of natural populations. Potential arenas of influence include altered evolutionary trajectories within populations and modifications of the process of divergence among populations. We consider this second arena in the medium ground finch (Geospiza fortis) on Santa Cruz Island, Galápagos, Ecuador. Our study compared the G. fortis population at a relatively undisturbed site, El Garrapatero, to the population at a severely disturbed site, Academy Bay, which is immediately adjacent to the town of Puerto Ayora. The El Garrapatero population currently shows beak size bimodality that is tied to assortative mating and disruptive selection, whereas the Academy Bay population was historically bimodal but has lost this property in conjunction with a dramatic increase in local human population density. We here evaluate potential ecological-adaptive drivers of the differences in modality by quantifying relationships between morphology (beak and head dimensions), functional performance (bite force), and environmental characteristics (diet). Our main finding is that associations among these variables are generally weaker at Academy Bay than at El Garrapatero, possibly because novel foods are used at the former site irrespective of individual morphology and performance. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the rugged adaptive landscapes promoting and maintaining diversification in nature can be smoothed by human activities, thus hindering ongoing adaptive radiation.
© 2011 The Author(s). Evolution© 2011 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21790573     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01297.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  19 in total

1.  Eutrophication causes speciation reversal in whitefish adaptive radiations.

Authors:  P Vonlanthen; D Bittner; A G Hudson; K A Young; R Müller; B Lundsgaard-Hansen; D Roy; S Di Piazza; C R Largiader; O Seehausen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Biodiversity: Species choked and blended.

Authors:  Jeffrey S McKinnon; Eric B Taylor
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The evolution of antipredator behaviour following relaxed and reversed selection in Alaskan threespine stickleback fish.

Authors:  Matthew A Wund; John A Baker; Justin L Golub; Susan A Foster
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Human influences on evolution, and the ecological and societal consequences.

Authors:  Andrew P Hendry; Kiyoko M Gotanda; Erik I Svensson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Small-scale intraspecific patterns of adaptive immunogenetic polymorphisms and neutral variation in Lake Superior lake trout.

Authors:  Shauna M Baillie; Riley R Hemstock; Andrew M Muir; Charles C Krueger; Paul Bentzen
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 2.846

6.  The head of the finch: the anatomy of the feeding system in two species of finches (Geospiza fortis and Padda oryzivora).

Authors:  Annelies Genbrugge; Anthony Herrel; Matthieu Boone; Luc Van Hoorebeke; Jeffrey Podos; Joris Dirckx; Peter Aerts; Adriaens Dominique
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 7.  Divergence and gene flow among Darwin's finches: A genome-wide view of adaptive radiation driven by interspecies allele sharing.

Authors:  Daniela H Palmer; Marcus R Kronforst
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.345

8.  Signatures of human-commensalism in the house sparrow genome.

Authors:  Mark Ravinet; Tore Oldeide Elgvin; Cassandra Trier; Mansour Aliabadian; Andrey Gavrilov; Glenn-Peter Sætre
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Indirect trophic interactions with an invasive species affect phenotypic divergence in a top consumer.

Authors:  P E Hirsch; P Eklöv; R Svanbäck
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  A practical guide and power analysis for GLMMs: detecting among treatment variation in random effects.

Authors:  Morgan P Kain; Ben M Bolker; Michael W McCoy
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.