Literature DB >> 2178992

A double-blind comparison of the efficacy and acceptability of Femodene and Microgynon-30.

N B Loudon1, R J Kirkman, J A Dewsbury.   

Abstract

The efficacy, cycle-control and tolerance of Microgynon-30, a widely prescribed levonorgestrel containing oral contraceptive, and Femodene, a new oral-contraceptive containing gestodene, were compared in a randomised, double-blind study involving 456 healthy women over a 6 month period. 229 women were allocated to receive Femodene and 227 received Microgynon-30. No differences between the groups in terms of obstetric and gynaecological history, previous contraceptive history, smoking habits, blood-pressure or body weight at admission were observed. No pregnancies were reported in either group, despite tablet-taking errors recorded in 6.3% of the Femodene group and 7.6% of the Microgynon-30 group. Both oral contraceptives were compared in terms of cycle length, intensity of the withdrawal bleed and side effects. Cycle-control was similar in the two groups. However, significantly fewer subjects reported breakthrough bleeding (with or without spotting) in the Femodene group (18% of patients) compared with the Microgynon-30 group (26% of patients). The incidence of absent withdrawal bleeds was 1% or less in both groups and no significant effects on body weight or blood pressure were observed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acceptor Characteristics; Acceptors; Biology; Bleeding; Blood Pressure--changes; Body Weight--changes; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods--side effects; Contraceptive Usage; Developed Countries; Diseases; Double-blind Studies; Europe; Evaluation; Family Planning; Family Planning Programs; Hemic System; Incidence; Measurement; Menstrual Cycle; Menstruation; Method Acceptability; Northern Europe; Oral Contraceptives--side effects; Physiology; Reproduction; Research Methodology; Signs And Symptoms; Studies; United Kingdom

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2178992     DOI: 10.1016/0028-2243(90)90079-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  3 in total

1.  Scare over oral contraceptives. New group will review evidence for effective care in family planning.

Authors:  P O'Brien
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-12-16

Review 2.  Gestodene. A review of its pharmacology, efficacy and tolerability in combined contraceptive preparations.

Authors:  M I Wilde; J A Balfour
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Effectiveness and acceptability of progestogens in combined oral contraceptives - a systematic review.

Authors:  Regina Kulier; Frans M Helmerhorst; Nandita Maitra; A Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 3.223

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.