Literature DB >> 21789530

Interaction frequency and per-interaction effects as predictors of total effects in plant-pollinator mutualisms: a case study with the self-incompatible herb Linaria lilacina.

Alfonso M Sánchez-Lafuente1, Miguel A Rodríguez-Gironés, Raquel Parra.   

Abstract

It is widely recognized that pollinators vary in their effectiveness in pollination mutualisms, due both to differences in flower-pollinator morphological fit as well as pollinator behaviour. However, pollination webs typically treat all interactions as equal, and we contend that this method may provide misleading results. Using empirical and theoretical data, we present the case study of a self-incompatible herb in which the number of flowers visited by a pollinator cannot be used as a surrogate for the total effect of a pollinator on a plant due to differences in per-visit effectiveness at producing seeds. In self-incompatible species, the relationship between interaction frequency and per-interaction effect may become increasingly negative as more flowers per plant are visited due to geitonogamous pollen transfer. We found that pollinators making longer bouts (i.e. visiting more flowers per plant visit) had an overall higher pollination success per bout. However, per-interaction effects tended to decrease as the bout progressed, particularly for pollinators that cause higher pollen deposition. Since the same interaction frequency may result from different combinations of number of bouts (plant visits) and bout length (flowers visited/bout), pollinators making repeatedly shorter bouts may contribute more to plant reproduction for the same number of flowers visited. Consequently, the magnitude of the differences in number of interactions of different insect types may be overridden by the magnitude of the differences in effectiveness as pollinators, even if the same pollinators consistently interact more frequently. We discuss two predictions regarding the validity of using interaction frequency as a surrogate for plant seed production (as a measure of total effect), depending on the degree of self-compatibility, plant size and floral display. We suggest that the role of interaction frequency must be tested for different species, environments, and across wider scales to validate its use as a surrogate for total effect in plant-pollinator networks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21789530     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2084-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  18 in total

1.  The geographic mosaic in predispersal interactions and selection on Helleborus foetidus (Ranunculaceae).

Authors:  P J Rey; C M Herrera; J Guitián; X Cerdá; A M Sánchez-Lafuente; M Medrano; J L Garrido
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.411

2.  Corolla herbivory, pollination success and fruit predation in complex flowers: an experimental study with Linaria lilacina (Scrophulariaceae).

Authors:  Alfonso M Sánchez-Lafuente
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Expanding the limits of the pollen-limitation concept: effects of pollen quantity and quality.

Authors:  Marcelo A Aizen; Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Plant generalization on pollinators: species property or local phenomenon?

Authors:  Carlos M Herrera
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.844

5.  Sources of variation in pollinator contribution within a guild: the effects of plant and pollinator factors.

Authors:  Olle Pellmyr; John N Thompson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Effects of inflorescence size on visits from pollinators and seed set of Corydalis ambigua (Papaveraceae).

Authors:  M Ohara; S Higashi
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Status of self-pollen in bee pollination efficiency of white clover (Trifolium repens L.).

Authors:  Guy Rodet; Bernard E Vaissière; Thierry Brévault; Jean-Paul Torre Grossa
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Pollinator visitation patterns strongly influence among-flower variation in selfing rate.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Karron; Karsten G Holmquist; Rebecca J Flanagan; Randall J Mitchell
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Ecological context of breeding system variation: sex, size and pollination in a (predominantly) gynodioecious shrub.

Authors:  Conchita Alonso; Pia Mutikainen; Carlos M Herrera
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Measuring specialization in species interaction networks.

Authors:  Nico Blüthgen; Florian Menzel; Nils Blüthgen
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 2.964

View more
  2 in total

1.  Corolla morphology influences diversification rates in bifid toadflaxes (Linaria sect. Versicolores).

Authors:  Mario Fernández-Mazuecos; José Luis Blanco-Pastor; José M Gómez; Pablo Vargas
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Bee species diversity enhances productivity and stability in a perennial crop.

Authors:  Shelley R Rogers; David R Tarpy; Hannah J Burrack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.