Literature DB >> 21788588

Mobile thrombus on device leads in patients undergoing ablation: identification, incidence, location, and association with increased pulmonary artery systolic pressure.

Gregory E Supple1, Jian-Fang Ren, Erica S Zado, Francis E Marchlinski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mobile thrombi, not routinely recognized on transthoracic echocardiography, are frequently identified on cardiovascular implantable electronic device leads with intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) during ablation procedures. Their incidence, characteristics, and consequences have not yet been defined. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We used ICE to examine leads for thrombi and to measure the pulmonary artery systolic pressure in patients with a cardiovascular implantable electronic device presenting for ablation. Patient clinical characteristics, device type, and lead characteristics were correlated with presence of thrombi. Most patients had congestive heart failure (84%), with an average left ventricular ejection fraction of 40%. Thrombi were seen with ICE in 26 of 86 patients (30%) but were seen on transthoracic echocardiography in only 1 of the 26 patients. Thrombi on ICE were mobile, averaged 18 ± 5.9 mm long by 4.4 ± 2.3 mm wide, and were more commonly identified in the right atrium (n=25) than in the right ventricle (n=5). Thrombi were associated with higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure: 39 ± 9 mm Hg with thrombi versus 33 ± 7 mm Hg without thrombi (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 1.20; P=0.01). No other characteristic assessed was associated with a significant difference in the presence of lead thrombi.
CONCLUSIONS: Mobile thrombi on cardiovascular implantable electronic device leads are present in 30% of patients undergoing ablation and are readily identified with ICE despite being underrecognized with transthoracic echocardiography. Further study is warranted to determine whether lead thrombi are a clinically relevant source of pulmonary emboli in some patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21788588     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.028647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  19 in total

1.  Right giant atrial thrombosis and pulmonary embolism complicating pacemaker leads.

Authors:  Antonio D'Aloia; Ivano Bonadei; Enrico Vizzardi; Antonio Curnis
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-08-30

2.  Interaction of cardiac implantable electronic device and patent foramen ovale in ischemic stroke: A case-only study.

Authors:  Kolade M Agboola; Jin-Moo Lee; Xiaoyan Liu; Eric Novak; Phillip S Cuculich; Daniel H Cooper; Amit Noheria
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Pacemaker lead-associated thrombosis in cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  Jesmar Buttigieg; Rachelle Asciak; Charles Mallia Azzopardi
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-07-07

Review 4.  [Ultrasound in the electrophysiological cardiac catheterization laboratory].

Authors:  Klaus-Jürgen Gutleben; Georg Nölker; Nikitas Lironis; Jens Günther
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2012-12-05

5.  Cardiac implantable electronic device lead-based masses and atrial fibrillation ablation: a case-based illustration of periprocedural anticoagulation management strategies.

Authors:  Charles J Lenz; Christopher V DeSimone; Shiva P Ponamgi; Alan Sugrue; Lawrence J Sinak; Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran; Douglas L Packer; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  The Emerging Roles of Leadless Devices.

Authors:  Jeffrey Arkles; Joshua Cooper
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-02

7.  Implanted endocardial lead characteristics and risk of stroke or transient ischemic attack.

Authors:  Vaibhav R Vaidya; Christopher V DeSimone; Samuel J Asirvatham; Vishnu M Chandra; Amit Noheria; David O Hodge; Joshua P Slusser; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Paul A Friedman
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Pulmonary embolism in patients with transvenous cardiac implantable electronic device leads.

Authors:  Amit Noheria; Shiva P Ponamgi; Christopher V Desimone; Vaibhav R Vaidya; Christopher A Aakre; Elisa Ebrille; Tiffany Hu; David O Hodge; Joshua P Slusser; Naser M Ammash; Charles J Bruce; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Paul A Friedman; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 5.214

9.  Endocardial Device Leads in Patients with Patent Foramen Ovale: Echocardiographic Correlates of Stroke/TIA and Mortality.

Authors:  Shiva P Ponamgi; Vaibhav R Vaidya; Christopher V Desimone; Amit Noheria; David O Hodge; Joshua P Slusser; Naser M Ammash; Charles J Bruce; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Paul A Friedman; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  Mobile thrombus on cardiac implantable electronic device leads of patients undergoing cardiac ablation: incidence, management, and outcomes.

Authors:  Alan Sugrue; Christopher V DeSimone; Charles J Lenz; Douglas L Packer; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.