Literature DB >> 21788243

Towards evidence-based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Which intraosseous device is best in the prehospital setting?

Alexander Olaussen1.   

Abstract

A short cut review was carried out to establish which intraosseous device is best for use in the prehospital environment. A total of 2100 papers were found using the reported search, of which 2 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results, and study weaknesses of these best papers are tabulated. The clinical bottom line is that traditional manual intraosseous infusion devices have better success rates and faster insertion times compared with semi-automatic intraosseous infusion devices in the prehospital setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21788243     DOI: 10.1136/emj.2010.108381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  1 in total

1.  A randomized trial comparing two intraosseous access devices in intrahospital healthcare providers with a focus on retention of knowledge, skill, and self-efficacy.

Authors:  H J G M Derikx; B M Gerritse; R Gans; N J M van der Meer
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 3.693

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.