Emil F Coccaro1, Anthony D Ong, A D Seroczynski, C S Bergeman. 1. Clinical Neuroscience & Psychopharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. ecoccaro@yoda.bsd.uchicago.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inability to monitor and self-regulate heightened levels of affect lability and affect intensity is associated with a range of mood, anxiety, and personality disorders, psychosomatic symptoms and socially maladaptive behaviors. Despite the importance of these aspects of affective regulation, there are no twin study data to shed light on the genetic and environmental components of these constructs. METHODS: Affective Lability Scale (ALS) and Affect Intensity Measure (AIM) questionnaires were administered to 796 male twins in the Vietnam Era Twin Registry and subjected to twin and model-fitting analyses. Complete data were available from 182 monozygotic and 119 dizygotic twin pairs. RESULTS: Biometrical genetic model-fitting estimates indicated that additive genetic influence accounted for 40% of the variance in affect intensity and 25% of the variance in the ALS subscale assessing anxiety-depression mood shifts. Nonadditive genetic influence was indicated for ALS subscales measuring shifts between normal mood and depression (29%) and anger (27%), respectively. There was negligible evidence of shared environmental influence on affect measures. In contrast, estimates of nonshared environmental influences ranged from 52% to 74%. LIMITATIONS: Female were not included in this study due to the nature of the twin cohort. Data from subjects in a population cohort may not generalize to clinical populations. Measures of environment were not included. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence for moderate heritability of affect intensity and specific measures of affect lability. Individual differences in mood regulation may represent phenotypic variation in a core psychobiologic vulnerability (e.g., neurotransmitter systems).
BACKGROUND: Inability to monitor and self-regulate heightened levels of affect lability and affect intensity is associated with a range of mood, anxiety, and personality disorders, psychosomatic symptoms and socially maladaptive behaviors. Despite the importance of these aspects of affective regulation, there are no twin study data to shed light on the genetic and environmental components of these constructs. METHODS: Affective Lability Scale (ALS) and Affect Intensity Measure (AIM) questionnaires were administered to 796 male twins in the Vietnam Era Twin Registry and subjected to twin and model-fitting analyses. Complete data were available from 182 monozygotic and 119 dizygotic twin pairs. RESULTS: Biometrical genetic model-fitting estimates indicated that additive genetic influence accounted for 40% of the variance in affect intensity and 25% of the variance in the ALS subscale assessing anxiety-depression mood shifts. Nonadditive genetic influence was indicated for ALS subscales measuring shifts between normal mood and depression (29%) and anger (27%), respectively. There was negligible evidence of shared environmental influence on affect measures. In contrast, estimates of nonshared environmental influences ranged from 52% to 74%. LIMITATIONS: Female were not included in this study due to the nature of the twin cohort. Data from subjects in a population cohort may not generalize to clinical populations. Measures of environment were not included. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence for moderate heritability of affect intensity and specific measures of affect lability. Individual differences in mood regulation may represent phenotypic variation in a core psychobiologic vulnerability (e.g., neurotransmitter systems).
Authors: Eric Mick; James McGough; Curtis K Deutsch; Jean A Frazier; David Kennedy; Robert J Goldberg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rudolf Uher; Jill Cumby; Lynn E MacKenzie; Jessica Morash-Conway; Jacqueline M Glover; Alice Aylott; Lukas Propper; Sabina Abidi; Alexa Bagnell; Barbara Pavlova; Tomas Hajek; David Lovas; Kathleen Pajer; William Gardner; Adrian Levy; Martin Alda Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Joey Ward; Rona J Strawbridge; Mark E S Bailey; Nicholas Graham; Amy Ferguson; Donald M Lyall; Breda Cullen; Laura M Pidgeon; Jonathan Cavanagh; Daniel F Mackay; Jill P Pell; Michael O'Donovan; Valentina Escott-Price; Daniel J Smith Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2017-11-30 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Guy Hindley; Kevin S O'Connell; Zillur Rahman; Oleksandr Frei; Shahram Bahrami; Alexey Shadrin; Margrethe C Høegh; Weiqiu Cheng; Naz Karadag; Aihua Lin; Linn Rødevand; Chun C Fan; Srdjan Djurovic; Trine V Lagerberg; Anders M Dale; Olav B Smeland; Ole A Andreassen Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 3.358