Literature DB >> 21788001

Visual information and rubber hand embodiment differentially affect reach-to-grasp actions.

Tobias Heed1, Michael Gründler, Jennifer Rinkleib, Franziska H Rudzik, Thérèse Collins, Edward Cooke, J Kevin O'Regan.   

Abstract

During the "rubber hand illusion" (RHI) participants feel touch originating from an artificial hand, which is felt to belong to the own body. The perceived location of the real hand is shifted towards the location of the artificial hand. However, evidence as to whether the RHI is accompanied by alterations of hand action is mixed. We found that the perceived size of one's own hand was affected by the size of the artificial hand that was used to elicit the illusion. Moreover, we tested a possible transfer of the RHI to a reach-to-grasp action. We observed that hand transport (i.e., reach) errors after RHI induction were independent of artificial hand size, showing that the parameter which is important for these reaching errors is the hand's perceived location. Results thus show that the RHI affects not only perceptual, but also action processing. In contrast, grip aperture was affected by artificial hand size independent of the RHI, suggesting that visual information about hand size affects grasping independent of embodiment of the artificial hand. Grip size increased with artificial hand size; this effect is explained by a higher reliance on proprioceptive information during blind reaching after receiving distorted visual information.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21788001     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  14 in total

1.  Body ownership determines the attenuation of self-generated tactile sensations.

Authors:  Konstantina Kilteni; H Henrik Ehrsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Action and perception in the rubber hand illusion.

Authors:  Martin Riemer; Dieter Kleinböhl; Rupert Hölzl; Jörg Trojan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Application of the rubber hand illusion paradigm: comparison between upper and lower limbs.

Authors:  Mareike Flögel; Karl Theodor Kalveram; Oliver Christ; Joachim Vogt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-02-06

4.  Uncertainty-based inference of a common cause for body ownership.

Authors:  Marie Chancel; H Henrik Ehrsson; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 8.713

5.  Multisensory Integration Dominates Hypnotisability and Expectations in the Rubber Hand Illusion.

Authors:  Mel Slater; H Henrik Ehrsson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 6.  The rubber hand illusion in children: What are we measuring?

Authors:  Lysha Lee; Winn Ma; Marjolein Kammers
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-05-21

7.  Rubber hand illusion affects joint angle perception.

Authors:  Martin V Butz; Esther F Kutter; Corinna Lorenz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Over my fake body: body ownership illusions for studying the multisensory basis of own-body perception.

Authors:  Konstantina Kilteni; Antonella Maselli; Konrad P Kording; Mel Slater
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  The Effect of Visual, Spatial and Temporal Manipulations on Embodiment and Action.

Authors:  Natasha Ratcliffe; Roger Newport
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's disease changes perception in the Rubber Hand Illusion.

Authors:  Catherine Ding; Colin J Palmer; Jakob Hohwy; George J Youssef; Bryan Paton; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Julie C Stout; Dominic Thyagarajan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.