Literature DB >> 21787924

Effects of providing total mixed rations indoors and on pasture on the behavior of lactating dairy cattle and their preference to be indoors or on pasture.

G L Charlton1, S M Rutter, M East, L A Sinclair.   

Abstract

Grazing is considered a normal behavior for dairy cattle, although they may not be able to meet their nutritional requirements from grazing alone, and so to sustain higher yields requires access to a total mixed ration (TMR). The study aim was to provide dairy cows with access to TMR indoors and on pasture to establish influence on behavior and preference for each location. The study took place from August to November, 2009, using 36 late-lactation Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. The cows were allocated to 1 of 3 26-d study periods (n=12×3). Within each period the cows were further divided into a control (n=6) or treatment (n=6) group using a crossover design, where the cows were changed between the control and treatment group after 13 d. Treatment cows had access to TMR indoors and on pasture, whereas control cows only had access to TMR indoors. Following a.m. and p.m. milkings the cows were taken to a point equidistant between indoors and pasture and given the choice of going to pasture (1.5 ha) or to a freestall barn. Between milkings the cows had free access between the locations. Initial choice was recorded and a video camera was used to record time spent in each location. Behavior observations were recorded to establish how the cows spent their time during the day. To determine what factors influenced preference, weather conditions, milk yield, body condition score, and lameness were recorded. Initially, the cows chose indoors following milking (96.4±0.80%). Overall, the cows expressed a partial preference for pasture (71.1±1.82%), which was different from 100, 50, and 0%. Study period influenced preference with cows spending less time on pasture as the season progressed (86.7 vs. 68.3 vs. 58.3% for study periods 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Providing the cows with TMR outdoors did not affect pasture use, but resulted in an increase in TMR intake of 2.2±0.41 kg of dry matter/d. The cows spent more time on pasture as the temperature-humidity index indoors (55.6±0.92) and outdoors (54.6±0.82) increased, but rainfall and milk yield did not influence preference. Cows with lameness score >1.5 spent more time indoors (35.4±4.52 vs. 25.2±2.64% for cows with >1.5 vs. ≤1.5 lameness score, respectively). In conclusion, the cows expressed a partial preference for pasture, which was not influenced by providing TMR on pasture.
Copyright © 2011 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21787924     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  10 in total

1.  Dairy cows value an open area for lying down.

Authors:  Laura Shewbridge Carter; Marie J Haskell; David Ball; Jenny Gibbons; W Edwin Harris; S Mark Rutter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 2.  The Influence of Different Types of Outdoor Access on Dairy Cattle Behavior.

Authors:  Anne-Marieke C Smid; Daniel M Weary; Marina A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-05-13

3.  Pasture Access Affects Behavioral Indicators of Wellbeing in Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Andrew Crump; Kirsty Jenkins; Emily J Bethell; Conrad P Ferris; Gareth Arnott
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Optimism and pasture access in dairy cows.

Authors:  Andrew Crump; Kirsty Jenkins; Emily J Bethell; Conrad P Ferris; Helen Kabboush; Jennifer Weller; Gareth Arnott
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Production performance, nutrient use efficiency, and predicted enteric methane emissions in dairy cows under confinement or grazing management system.

Authors:  Andre F Brito; Kleves V Almeida; Andre S Oliveira
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-02-26

6.  A "Good Life" for Dairy Cattle: Developing and Piloting a Framework for Assessing Positive Welfare Opportunities Based on Scientific Evidence and Farmer Expertise.

Authors:  Jessica E Stokes; Elizabeth Rowe; Siobhan Mullan; Joy C Pritchard; Rachel Horler; Marie J Haskell; Cathy M Dwyer; David C J Main
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.231

7.  Effects of Three Feeding Systems on Production Performance, Rumen Fermentation and Rumen Digesta Particle Structure of Beef Cattle.

Authors:  Y F Liu; F F Sun; F C Wan; H B Zhao; X M Liu; W You; H J Cheng; G F Liu; X W Tan; E L Song
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.509

8.  A systematic review of non-productivity-related animal-based indicators of heat stress resilience in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Elena Galán; Pol Llonch; Arantxa Villagrá; Harel Levit; Severino Pinto; Agustín Del Prado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Production and Health Management from Grazing to Confinement Systems of Largest Dairy Bovine Farms in Azores: A Farmers' Perspective.

Authors:  Ivo Medeiros; Aitor Fernandez-Novo; Susana Astiz; João Simões
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 10.  Historical Evolution of Cattle Management and Herd Health of Dairy Farms in OECD Countries.

Authors:  Ivo Medeiros; Aitor Fernandez-Novo; Susana Astiz; João Simões
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-03-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.