Literature DB >> 21787920

The relationship between dairy cow hygiene and somatic cell count in milk.

A C Sant'anna1, M J R Paranhos da Costa.   

Abstract

Corporal hygiene is an important indicator of welfare for dairy cows and is dependent on facilities, climate conditions, and the behavior of the animals. The objectives of this study were to describe how the hygiene conditions of dairy cows vary over time and to assess whether a relationship exists between hygiene and somatic cell count (SCC) in milk. Monthly hygiene evaluations were conducted on lactating cows in 2 dairy farms for 9 consecutive months, totaling 3,554 evaluations from 545 animals. Hygiene was measured using a 4-point scoring system (very clean, clean, dirty, and very dirty) for 4 areas of the animal's body (leg, flank, abdomen, and udder) and combining these scores to generate a composite cleanliness score. A total of 2,218 milk samples was analyzed from 404 cows to determine SCC and somatic cell linear scores (SCLS). Individual variation was observed in the hygiene of cows throughout the year, with the highest proportion of clean cows being observed in August and the lowest in January. In spite of this seasonal variation, approximately half (55.62%) of the cows displayed consistent cleanliness scores, with 45.86% of them remaining consistently clean (very clean or clean) and 9.76% remaining dirty (very dirty or dirty) over the course of the study. The very clean cows had the lowest SCLS, followed by the clean, dirty, and very dirty cows (no statistically significant differences were found between the latter 2 groups). The most critical months for cow hygiene were those with the greatest rainfall, when a reduction in the welfare of cows and higher SCC values were observed. The evaluation and control of dairy cow hygiene are useful in defining management strategies to reduce problems with milk and improve the welfare of the animals.
Copyright © 2011 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21787920     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  7 in total

1.  Reliability of observational- and machine-based teat hygiene scoring methodologies.

Authors:  David I Douphrate; Nathan B Fethke; Matthew W Nonnenmann; Anabel Rodriguez; David Gimeno Ruiz de Porras
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Non-Compliance and Follow-Up in Swedish Official and Private Animal Welfare Control of Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Frida Lundmark Hedman; Jan Hultgren; Helena Röcklinsberg; Birgitta Wahlberg; Charlotte Berg
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Human Relationships with Domestic and Other Animals: One Health, One Welfare, One Biology.

Authors:  Ariel M Tarazona; Maria C Ceballos; Donald M Broom
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Prevalence and Comparing of Some Microbiological Properties, Somatic Cell Count and Antibiotic Residue of Organic and Conventional Raw Milk Produced in Turkey.

Authors:  Bayram Ürkek; Mustafa Şengül; Tuba Erkaya; Vecihi Aksakal
Journal:  Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2017-04-30       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 5.  Keeping Dairy Cows for Longer: A Critical Literature Review on Dairy Cow Longevity in High Milk-Producing Countries.

Authors:  Gabriel M Dallago; Kevin M Wade; Roger I Cue; J T McClure; René Lacroix; Doris Pellerin; Elsa Vasseur
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Cattle Cleanliness from the View of Swedish Farmers and Official Animal Welfare Inspectors.

Authors:  Frida Lundmark Hedman; Maria Andersson; Vanja Kinch; Amelie Lindholm; Angelica Nordqvist; Rebecka Westin
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  A Comparison of Rice Husks and Peanut Shells as Bedding Materials on Dairy Cows' Preferences, Behaviour, and Health.

Authors:  Pengtao Li; Amin Cai; Kris Descovich; Tong Fu; Hongxia Lian; Tengyun Gao; Clive J C Phillips
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.