BACKGROUND: In 2008 NHS Lothian implemented a COPD tele-monitoring service incorporating a touch-screen computer for daily recording of symptoms and weekly oximetry and spirometry measurement. Data were transmitted by secure broadband link to a call centre where trained workers monitored data and contacted clinicians according to an agreed algorithm. AIMS: To explore the perceptions of patients and professionals about the pilot implementation of the COPD tele-monitoring service. METHODS: In-depth interviews were undertaken with patients and professionals before and after installation of the tele-monitoring equipment. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. Data on use of healthcare resources were obtained from primary care records. RESULTS: Twenty of the 27 patients in the pilot and 25 professionals participated. (n=55 interviews and one focus group). Patients were generally positive about the technology, which they perceived enabled earlier recognition of exacerbations and facilitated access to clinical advice. In contrast, clinicians had concerns about false positive symptom scores, difficulties in interpreting physiological data, overtreatment (reflected in a large increase in antibiotics and steroid prescribing), and an increased workload. CONCLUSIONS: Tele-monitoring was perceived by patients as improving access to professional care, but raised concerns for clinicians about possible over-treatment and how best to organise services to support the technology.
BACKGROUND: In 2008 NHS Lothian implemented a COPD tele-monitoring service incorporating a touch-screen computer for daily recording of symptoms and weekly oximetry and spirometry measurement. Data were transmitted by secure broadband link to a call centre where trained workers monitored data and contacted clinicians according to an agreed algorithm. AIMS: To explore the perceptions of patients and professionals about the pilot implementation of the COPD tele-monitoring service. METHODS: In-depth interviews were undertaken with patients and professionals before and after installation of the tele-monitoring equipment. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. Data on use of healthcare resources were obtained from primary care records. RESULTS: Twenty of the 27 patients in the pilot and 25 professionals participated. (n=55 interviews and one focus group). Patients were generally positive about the technology, which they perceived enabled earlier recognition of exacerbations and facilitated access to clinical advice. In contrast, clinicians had concerns about false positive symptom scores, difficulties in interpreting physiological data, overtreatment (reflected in a large increase in antibiotics and steroid prescribing), and an increased workload. CONCLUSIONS: Tele-monitoring was perceived by patients as improving access to professional care, but raised concerns for clinicians about possible over-treatment and how best to organise services to support the technology.
Authors: A Casas; T Troosters; J Garcia-Aymerich; J Roca; C Hernández; A Alonso; F del Pozo; P de Toledo; J M Antó; R Rodríguez-Roisín; M Decramer Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2006-04-12 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Jaap C A Trappenburg; Anouk Niesink; Gerdien H de Weert-van Oene; Hans van der Zeijden; Renée van Snippenburg; Albert Peters; Jan-Willem J Lammers; Augustinus J P Schrijvers Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Daniel Sanchez-Morillo; Miguel Angel Fernandez-Granero; Antonio León Jiménez Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2015-03-01 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Melinda M Davis; Michele Freeman; Jeffrey Kaye; Nancy Vuckovic; David I Buckley Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2014-04-14 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Katherine Morton; Laura Dennison; Carl May; Elizabeth Murray; Paul Little; Richard J McManus; Lucy Yardley Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2016-10-20