| Literature DB >> 21785626 |
Michael Francis Johnston1, Elizabeth Ortiz Sánchez, Nikola L Vujanovic, Wenhui Li.
Abstract
This article presents the hypothesis that acupuncture enhances anticancer immune functions by stimulating natural killer (NK) cells. It provides background information on acupuncture, summarizes the current scientific understanding of the mechanisms through which NK cells act to eliminate cancer cells, and reviews evidence that acupuncture is associated with increases in NK cell quantity and function in both animals and humans. The key contribution of this article involves the use of cellular immunology and molecular biological theory to interpret and synthesize evidence from disparate animal and human studies in formulating the 'acupuncture immuno-enhancement hypothesis': clinicians may use acupuncture to promote the induction and secretion of NK-cell activating cytokines that engage specific NK cell receptors that endogenously enhance anticancer immune function.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21785626 PMCID: PMC3135660 DOI: 10.1093/ecam/nep236
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Changes of CD16+ and CD56+ NK cells in peripheral blood following acupuncture.
| Timing of measurement | CD16+ (%) | CD56+ (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Before acupuncture | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 5.8 ± 0.7 |
| First day after acupuncture | 1.6 ± 0.3* | 7.5 ± 1.0* |
| Second day after acupuncture | 2.2 ± 0.5* | 8.5 ± 1.5* |
| Eighth day after acupuncture | 2.1 ± 0.4* | 11.2 ± 1.8** |
Data are means ± SD. Blood samples were drawn from the forearm vein with a syringe containing heparin in 17 healthy volunteers aged 21–51 years who received one acupuncture treatment on August 10, 2005. The mononuclear blood cells were separated, stained with fluorescent conjugated monoclonal antibodies and analyzed with fluorescence-activated cell sorter. Table adopted from Yamaguchi et al. [39].
*P < .05, **P < .01: statistical significance of differences of the results compared with baseline levels.
Figure 1NK cells in tumor surveillance. Reproduced with permission from Takeda and Okumura; Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2004 : 1 : 17–27.
Figure 2Neural circuits related to somatosympathetic reflexes in the gracile-thalamic-cortex pathways. Reproduced with permission from Ma, Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2004 : 1 : 41–47.
Figure 3Hypothetic model of the mechanisms how acupuncture stimulates the immune system. Acupuncture stimulation of ST36 acupoint induces release of nitric oxide (NO). NO, a neurotransmiter, stimulates via the sensory nerves, spinal cord and medulla oblongata Gracile nuclceus the lateral hypothalamic area (LHA), where it promotes secretion of opiod peptides such as β-endorphin. β-endorphin travels via blood circulation to the spleen and other body locations containing immune cells where it binds to opiod receptors expressed on the surface of NK cells and stimulates NK cells to amplify their expression of cytotoxic molecules and consequently tumoricidal activity, and production of IFN-γ. This cytokine induces the expression of NK cell receptors and cytokine receptors on NK cells and perhaps cytokine secretion by other immune cells, thereby orchestrating and further amplifying anticancer immune functions.
Studies with evidence that acupuncture stimulation modulates NK cell function in humans.
| Authors, journal, year of publication | Arranz et al., | Yamaguchi et al., | Petti et al., |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects | Women with anxiety (controls, healthy women) | Normal individuals | Patients with pain |
| Treatment group | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Placebo control group | No | No | No |
| Non-placebo control group | Yes | No | Yes |
| Overall Jaded scorea | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Scored component items of the Jaded score | |||
| Study described as randomized (Yes = 1; No = 0) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Randomization appropriate (Yes = 1; No = −1) | 0 | 0 | −1 |
| Subject blinded (Yes = 1; No = 0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Evaluator blinded (Yes = 1; No = 0) | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Subjects that withdrew and/or dropped out described (Yes = 1; No = 0) | 1 | 1 | 0 |
aUsed to assess quality of methods, with 5 being the highest score possible.
Studies with evidence that acupuncture stimulation activates NK cells.
| Authors, journal, year of publication | Yu et al., | Yu et al., | Choi et al., |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects | BALBrc_qrq.mice, athymic BALBrc and ICR | Inbred F344 rats | Sprague-Dawley rats |
|
| |||
| Treatment group | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Placebo control group | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Non-placebo control group | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Overall Jaded scorea | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| Scored component items of the Jaded score | |||
| Study described as randomized (Yes = 1; No = 0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Randomization appropriate (Yes = 1; No = −1) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Subject blinded (Yes = 1; No = 0) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Evaluator blinded (Yes = 1; No = 0) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Subjects that withdrew and/or dropped out Described (Yes = 1; No = 0) | 0 | 1 | 0 |
aUsed to assess quality of methods, with 5 being the highest score possible.
Studies with evidence that acupuncture stimulation leads to proliferation of NK cells.
| Authors, journal, year of publication | Kim et al., | Yu et al., | Choi et al., |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects | Sprague-Dawley rats | BALBrc_qrq.mice, athymic BALBrc and ICR | Sprague-Dawley rats |
|
| |||
| Treatment group | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Placebo control group | No | Yes | Yes |
| Non-placebo control group | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Overall Jaded scorea | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| Jaded score components | |||
| Study described as randomized (Yes = 1; No = 0) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Randomization appropriate (Yes = 1; No = −1) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Subject blinded (Yes = 1; No = 0) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Evaluator blinded (Yes = 1; No = 0) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Subjects that withdrew and/or dropped out described (Yes = 1; No = 0) | 1 | 0 | 0 |
aUsed to assess quality of methods, with 5 being the highest score possible.
Studies with evidence that acupuncture stimulation modulates expression of NK cell receptors.
| Authors, journal, year of publication | Rho et al., | Kim et al., | Xiao et al., | Ma et al., | Wu et al., |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects | Sprague-Dawley rats | Sprague-Dawley rats | People with rheumatoid arthritis (controls, healthy people) | BALB/c mice | Hospital patients diagnosed with a malignant tumor prior to surgery |
| Treatment group | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Placebo control group | No | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Non-placebo control group | Yesb | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Jaded scorea | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| Jaded score components | |||||
| Study described as randomized (yes = 1; no = 0) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Randomization appropriate (yes = 1; no = −1) | 1 | 0 | −1 | 1 | −1 |
| Subject blinded (yes = 1; no = 0) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Evaluator blinded (yes = 1; no = 0) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Subjects that withdrew and/or dropped out described (yes = 1; no = 0) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
aUsed to assess quality of methods, with 5 being the highest score possible.
bAuthors state “At the same time, the control group of rats (n = 6) were restrained in holders without EA stimulation or with EA stimulation at a non-acupoint”.