Literature DB >> 21785480

Retrospective review of the efficacy and safety of repeated pulsed and continuous radiofrequency lesioning of the dorsal root ganglion/segmental nerve for lumbar radicular pain.

Jyotsna V Nagda1, Craig W Davis, Zahid H Bajwa, Thomas T Simopoulos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic lumbosacral radicular pain is a common source of radiating leg pain seen in pain management patients. These patients are frequently managed conservatively with multiple modalities including medications, physical therapy, and epidural steroid injections. Radiofrequency has been used to treat chronic radicular pain for over 30 years; however, there is a paucity of literature about the safety and efficacy of repeat radiofrequency lesioning.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety, success rate, and duration of pain relief of repeat pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) and continuous radiofrequency (CRF) lesioning of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG)/ sacral segmental nerves (SN) in patients with chronic lumbosacral radicular pain. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review
SETTING: Outpatient multidisciplinary pain center
METHODS: Medical record review of patients who were treated with pulsed and continuous radiofrequency lesioning of the lumbar dorsal root ganglia and segmental nerves and who reported initial success were evaluated for recurrence of pain and repeat radiofrequency treatment. Responses to subsequent treatments were compared to initial treatments for success rates, average duration of relief, and adverse neurologic side-effects. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective chart review without a control group.
RESULTS: Twenty-six women and 24 men were identified who received 50% pain relief or better after PRF and CRF of the lumbar DRG/ sacral SN for lumbosacral radicular pain. The mean age was 62 years (range, 25-86). The mean duration of relief for the 40 patients who had 2 treatments was 4.7 months (range 0-24; Se [standard error] 0.74). Twenty-eight patients had 3 treatments with an average duration of relief of 4.5 months (range 0-19 months; Se 0.74). Twenty patients had 4 treatments with a mean duration of relief of 4.4 months (range 0.5-18; Se 0.95) and 18 patients who had 5 or more treatments received an average duration of relief of 4.3 months (range 0.5-18; Se 1.03). The average duration of relief and success frequency remained constant after each subsequent radiofrequency treatment. Of the 50 total patients, there was only 1 reported complication, specifically, transient thigh numbness which resolved after one week.
CONCLUSIONS: Repeated pulsed and continuous radiofrequency ablation of the lumbar dorsal root ganglion/segmental nerve shows promise to be a safe and effective long-term palliative management for lumbosacral radicular pain in some patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21785480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Physician        ISSN: 1533-3159            Impact factor:   4.965


  10 in total

Review 1.  A comprehensive review of pulsed radiofrequency in the treatment of pain associated with different spinal conditions.

Authors:  Giancarlo Facchini; Paolo Spinnato; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Ugo Albisinni; Alberto Bazzocchi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Pulsed radiofrequency under ultrasound guidance for the tarsal tunnel syndrome: two case reports.

Authors:  Jin Young Chon; Yun Jin Hahn; Choon Ho Sung; Sung Hoon Jung; Ho Sik Moon
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Lumbar Radicular Pain: Impact on Surgical Indications.

Authors:  José Manuel Trinidad; Ana Isabel Carnota; Inmaculada Failde; Luis Miguel Torres
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2015-08-16

4.  Pulsed radiofrequency treatment of the lumbar dorsal root ganglion in patients with chronic lumbar radicular pain: a randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Harsha Shanthanna; Philip Chan; James McChesney; Lehana Thabane; James Paul
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Comparison of efficacy of continuous epidural block and pulsed radiofrequency to the dorsal root ganglion for management of pain persisting beyond the acute phase of herpes zoster.

Authors:  Eung Don Kim; Young In Lee; Hue Jung Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison between bipolar pulsed radiofrequency and monopolar pulsed radiofrequency in chronic lumbosacral radicular pain: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Min Cheol Chang; Yun Woo Cho; Sang Ho Ahn
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Pulsed Radiofrequency as a Minimally Invasive Treatment Option in Anterior Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome: A Retrospective Analysis of 26 Patients.

Authors:  Robbert C Maatman; Monique A H Steegers; Jan-Willem Kallewaard; Marc R M Scheltinga; Rudi M H Roumen
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2018-04-13

Review 8.  What Is New in the Clinical Management of Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Enrique Orrillo; Luis Vidal Neira; Fabián Piedimonte; Ricardo Plancarte Sanchez; Smiljan Astudilllo Mihovilovic; Marco Antonio Narvaez Tamayo; Martina Rekatsina; Giustino Varrassi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-09

Review 9.  Safety of Conventional and Pulsed Radiofrequency Lesions of the Dorsal Root Entry Zone Complex (DREZC) for Interventional Pain Management: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mila Pastrak; Ognjen Visnjevac; Tanja Visnjevac; Frederick Ma; Alaa Abd-Elsayed
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2022-04-17

10.  Direct radiofrequency application improves pain and gait in collagenase-induced acute achilles tendon injury.

Authors:  Yun-Pu Tsai; Chi-Wen Chang; Jung-Shun Lee; Jen-I Liang; Tsung-Hsun Hsieh; Ming-Long Yeh; Chun-I Sze
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.629

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.