Literature DB >> 21785465

Hipk2 cooperates with p53 to suppress γ-ray radiation-induced mouse thymic lymphoma.

J-H Mao1, D Wu, I-J Kim, H C Kang, G Wei, J Climent, A Kumar, F G Pelorosso, R DelRosario, E J Huang, A Balmain.   

Abstract

A genome-wide screen for genetic alterations in radiation-induced thymic lymphomas generated from p53+/- and p53-/- mice showed frequent loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on chromosome 6. Fine mapping of these LOH regions revealed three non-overlapping regions, one of which was refined to a 0.2 Mb interval that contained only the gene encoding homeobox-interacting protein kinase 2 (Hipk2). More than 30% of radiation-induced tumors from both p53+/- and p53-/- mice showed heterozygous loss of one Hipk2 allele. Mice carrying a single inactive allele of Hipk2 in the germline were susceptible to induction of tumors by γ-radiation, but most tumors retained and expressed the wild-type allele, suggesting that Hipk2 is a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor gene for mouse lymphoma development. Heterozygous loss of both Hipk2 and p53 confers strong sensitization to radiation-induced lymphoma. We conclude that Hipk2 is a haploinsufficient lymphoma suppressor gene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21785465      PMCID: PMC3307058          DOI: 10.1038/onc.2011.306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


Introduction

The p53 tumor suppressor gene, one of most commonly mutated genes in a wide spectrum of human and animal tumors, controls cellular responses to DNA damage and forms a critical link to downstream effectors of growth arrest or cell death. We have previously described a genetic screen for modifiers of p53-dependent or -independent pathways leading to tumorigenesis in the mouse (Cai ; Mao , 2007). This approach identified loci on chromosomes 3, 16 and 18, which undergo genetic alterations, specifically in tumors from mice carrying at least one functional p53 allele, and are therefore likely to contain genes that mediate p53 signaling during tumor development. Additional loci on chromosomes 6, 12 and 19 showed genomic changes that were completely independent of the presence of p53. Detailed sublocalization of the commonest region of genomic alterations on chromosome 6 has enabled us to find a locus, which contains only one gene, the homeodomain interacting protein kinase 2 (Hipk2) gene. Hipk2 is a recently identified serine/threonine nuclear kinase that is highly conserved in mammalian organisms. Hipk2 acts as a multi-functional transcriptional regulator and corepressor that regulate cell growth, apoptosis, proliferation and development. HIPK2 has been found to be activated by a variety of DNA damaging agents, including ultraviolet light, ionizing radiation and genotoxic chemotherapeutic drugs (D'Orazi ; Hofmann ; Di Stefano ; Dauth ). In response to DNA damage, HIPK2 activates human p53 by promoting site-specific phosphorylation at Ser46 and subsequently activates apoptotic p53 target genes including PUMA, Noxa, DR5, PIG3, p53AIP1 and Bax (D'Orazi ; Hofmann ; Di Stefano ; Pistritto ). In addition, HIPK2 has also been shown to interact with and promote the degradation of CtBP in response to ultraviolet-induced DNA damage, and can induce p53 independent apoptosis (Zhang ). HIPK2 has also been shown to induce phosphorylation and degradation of c-Myb through the Wnt signaling pathway in the control of cell proliferation (Kanei-Ishii ) and to interact with several proteins containing the high mobility group I domain, a highly conserved domain in transcription factors of the lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1/T cell factor (LEF1-TCF) family (Pierantoni , 2007). Our previous study showed that germline deficiency of Hipk2 increased susceptibility to two-stage chemically induced skin tumor development (Wei ), suggesting that Hipk2 may act as a tumor suppressor gene. Herein, we demonstrate loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of Hipk2 in radiation-induced tumors from both p53+/− and p53−/− mice and show that Hipk2 deficiency in mice promotes γ-radiation-induced tumor development.

Results

Sublocalization of LOH regions on chromosome 6

A substantial proportion of lymphomas induced in p53+/− and p53−/− mice by γ-radiation treatment show LOH on chromosome 6 (Mao ). Although most of the tumors showed large-scale losses involving the whole chromosome, several showed discrete patterns of loss that implicated at least three separate regions of deletion (Figure 1a). The smallest interval identified from our initial screen was a 0.2-Mb region between D6Mit91 and D6Mit222. This interval encodes only the Hipk2 gene, a multi-functional transcriptional cofactor that regulates cell growth and proliferation. In a search for point mutations in the Hipk2 coding region, the complete coding sequence was determined from 20 tumors from p53+/− mice and a further 20 tumors from p53−/− mice. No point mutations were found in any of the tumors. RNA was available from all lymphomas that showed LOH at the Hipk2 locus, and in all cases, the remaining Hipk2 allele was present (Figure 1b), indicating that no gene silencing had occurred. Further, we quantified the expression of Hipk2 in radiation-induced thymic lymphoma by quantitative TaqMan analysis. Figure 1c shows that 50% of tumors with LOH (7/14) had clearly reduced Hipk2 mRNA levels in comparison with normal thymus, or with tumors that retained both parental alleles (retention of heterozygosity) of Hipk2. We conclude that Hipk2 is subject to genetic changes leading to reduced expression in a substantial proportion of lymphomas from p53 heterozygous mice.
Figure 1

LOH of Hipk2 in radiation-induced thymic lymphomas. (a) Detailed analysis of partial LOH patterns on chromosome 6 sublocalized three regions, denoted by the horizontal lines at the top of the figure. Physical mapping of markers and genes is based on the Ensembl database. Tumors showing either complete loss of chromosome 6 or no change are not shown in the Figure. LOH region 1 is centered on Hipk2. (b) mRNA expression of Hipk2 in thymic lymphomas examined by RT–PCR, showing that all lymphomas examined retained expression of the remaining allele of Hipk2 (c) Comparison of mRNA expression levels of Hipk2 in tumors with LOH versus those with retention of heterozygosity using a quantitative TaqMan assay. The average expression level in tumors with LOH (lanes 4–17) is reduced, compared with those without LOH (lanes 18–27), and with normal thymus (lanes 1–3).

Hipk2 cooperates with p53 in γ-radiation-induced tumorigenesis

To investigate whether loss of Hipk2 accelerated γ-irradiation-induced tumorigenesis in vivo, 37 Hipk2+/− and 31 wild-type mice were exposed to a single dose of 4-Gy γ-irradiation at 5 weeks of age. At the same time, 51 Hipk2+/− and 34 wild-type mice were left untreated and observed concurrently to determine the spontaneous rate of tumor development. Within 75 weeks, only one unirradiated Hipk2+/− mouse, none of the unirradiated wild-type mice and two irradiated wild-type mice developed tumors, in contrast to more than 40% of irradiated Hipk2+/− mice (Figure 2a). We conclude that Hipk2 is a functional tumor suppressor gene, loss of which increases susceptibility to tumors induced by radiation exposure. Importantly, loss of one allele of Hipk2 also accelerated tumorigenesis in irradiated p53+/− mice (P=0.015 for tumorigenesis in 29 p53+/− mice versus 36 Hipk2+/−p53+/− mice; Figure 2b), in agreement with the observation of p53-independent deletions of this chromosomal region in mouse lymphomas (Mao ).
Figure 2

Hipk2-deficient mice are susceptible to radiation-induced tumor development. (a) Spontaneous and radiation-induced tumorigenesis in Hipk2+/− and wild-type mice. 37 Hipk2+/− and 31 wild-type mice were exposed to a single dose of a 4-Gy γ-irradiation at 5 weeks of age. At the same time, 51 Hipk2+/− and 34 wild-type mice acted as unirradiated controls. (b) Radiation-induced tumorigenesis in double heterozygous Hipk2+/−p53+/− (n=36) and p53+/− (n=29) mice, showing the cooperative effects of partial deficiency in both genes.

Hipk2 is a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor

Our observation of high frequency LOH, absence of point mutations and any evidence of silencing of the remaining allele suggested that Hipk2 might function as a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor gene. In agreement with this interpretation, tumors from the Hipk2+/−p53+/− double heterozygous mice showed loss of the remaining Hipk2 allele in only 1 of 20 tumors investigated, whereas loss of the remaining p53 allele was found in 18 of 20 tumors (Figure 3a). Expression of Hipk2 was detected at the RNA level in tumors that had retained the wild-type allele, indicating that no gene silencing had taken place (Figure 3b). We conclude that Hipk2 has many of the properties of a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor gene, in that loss of one copy confers predisposition without requiring complete inactivation of the remaining allele.
Figure 3

Hipk2 is a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor gene. (a) LOH analysis of thymic lymphomas from Hipk2+/−p53+/− mice on chromosome 6 and 11. PCR analysis was carried out on 20 matched normal—tumor DNA samples to investigate loss of the wild-type alleles of Hipk2 (top panel) and p53 (bottom panel). Only one tumor (number 6) showed loss of the wild-type Hipk2 allele, but 18/20 showed loss of the wild-type p53 allele. (b) Expression analysis of Hipk2 in thymic lymphomas from Hipk2+/−p53+/− mice by RT–PCR analysis. Only tumor number6 that had lost the wild-type Hipk2 allele showed complete loss of Hipk2 expression.

Discussion

In this report, we have shown that LOH of the mouse Hipk2 gene occurs frequently in radiation-induced thymic lymphomas. Most tumors retain and express one copy of the wild-type allele, demonstrating that the Hipk2 gene has a haploinsufficient role in mouse lymphoma development. Deletion analysis of lymphoma DNA samples allowed us to localize the smallest common region of deletion to a 200-kb region containing only Hipk2, thus identifying this gene as the most viable candidate tumor suppressor. A functional role for Hipk2 in lymphomagenesis was demonstrated using mice carrying germline mutations in the Hipk2 gene. Hipk2 heterozygous mice are susceptible to radiation-induced tumorigenesis, but tumors retained and expressed the wild-type allele, in agreement with the hypothesis that loss of a single gene copy is sufficient to impact tumor susceptibility. Our observations of a haploinsufficient effect of Hipk2 loss in lymphomagenesis suggests that chromosome changes resulting in copy number changes on human chromosome 7q34, where HIPK2 is located, may have a role in development of human leukemias and solid tumors in which this chromosome undergoes somatic alterations (Mitelman ). Others have reported rare HIPK2 mutations in AML (Li ), but there are also reports of amplification of HIPK2 in some cancers (Deshmukh ), suggesting a complex role that is context dependent. This complexity is further underlined by apparently contradictory results on the effects of Hipk2 on cell growth. Pierantoni demonstrated that Hipk2 can act as a suppressor of proliferation, but nevertheless cells from Hipk2 knockout (KO) mice have variously been reported to exhibit decreased (Trapasso ) or increased (Wei ) cell growth in vitro. The reasons or these discrepancies are unclear, and may be related to the specific nature of the KO alleles or the genetic background from which the cells were derived. Our data demonstrate conclusively that Hipk2 is a tumor suppressor gene in vivo; however, the fact that tumors retain and express one wild-type allele suggests that complete Hipk2 loss may in some way be detrimental to tumor growth. The mechanistic basis for the positive or negative effects of Hipk2 on cell growth and tumor development remains to be established. Although HIPK2 has been implicated in regulating p53-dependent cell growth and apoptosis (D'Orazi ; Hofmann ), our studies on radiation-induced tumor development in the Hipk2/p53 double heterozygous mice show that the activities of these two genes in lymphomagenesis are independent, as germline deletion of one copy of both genes shows additive effects on lymphoma susceptibility. Independent effects of loss of p53 and of Hipk2 were also evident during the somatic events involved in tumor progression, as loss of one Hipk2 allele was also found in tumors from p53−/− mice. Documented p53-independent functions of HIPK2 include induction of apoptosis upon DNA damage, through proteasomal degradation of CtBP (Zhang ), but whether this mechanism is linked to the tumor suppressor role of Hipk2 in lymphoma susceptibility and progression remains to be determined.

Materials and methods

Mice and tumor induction

p53 and Hipk2 single or double heterozygous KO mice were generated by crossing Hipk2+/− heterozygous KO (Wei ) with p53+/− heterozygous KO mice (C57BL/6J), purchased from The Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). Mice at 5 weeks of age of both sexes were exposed to a single dose of 4-Gy whole body γ-irradiation and monitored daily until moribund, then killed and autopsied. Mice were bred and treated under University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) Laboratory Animal Resource Center (LARC) regulations.

Preparation of DNA

Thymic lymphomas and normal tissues were minced and placed in a microfuge tube containing 0.5 ml lysis buffer (100 m Tris–HCl, pH 8.5; 5 m ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid, 0.2% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 200 m NaCl). Proteinase K was added at a final concentration of 100 μg/ml and incubated at 55 °C overnight. The lysate was extracted twice with an equal volume of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1, v/v) (GibcoBRL, Carlsbad, CA, USA). DNA in the lysate was precipitated by addition of an equal volume of isopropanol. The DNA precipitates were solubilized in TE buffer (10 m Tris–HCl, pH 8.0 and 1 m ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid).

Sublocalizing LOH on chromosome 6 by PCR of microsatellite markers

LOH was determined by PCR of microsatellite markers, with normal and tumor DNA from the same mice. Map position was based on the Ensembl (http://uswest.ensembl.org/Mus_musculus). The primers for microsatellite marker within the Hipk2 gene are: F: AGCTTAGATGGTCTGTGGAA; R: GCAGGTCTCTACTAGCATGG. PCR primer pairs for markers were purchased from Qiagen Operon (www.operon.com). PCR reactions were set up in a total volume of 20 μl, containing 2 μl of 10 × PCR buffer (Bioline, Tauton, MA, USA), 1.6 μl of 2.5 m dNTPs (Pharmacia Biosystem Ltd, Piscataway, NJ, USA), 1 μl (6.6 μ) of each primer, 0.6 μl of 50 m MgCl2 (Bioline), 11.7 μl dH2O, 0.1 μl Taq polymerase (Bioline) and 2 μl (40 ng/μl) tumor or normal tissue DNA. Amplifications were initially denatured at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C or 52 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s, and then a final incubation at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were then mixed with loading buffer and electrophoresed in 4% (3% NuSieve/1% agarose) agarose gel with 0.5 mg/ml ethidium-bromide, photographed and saved in image file for analysis of density of bands.

Mutational analysis of the Hipk2 coding region

Total RNA was extracted from tumor tissue samples with the TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Reverse transcription PCR reactions were performed using Thermoscript RT–PCR system (GibcoBRL) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Mutation analysis of the Hipk2 gene was performed by PCR amplification of cDNA from thymic lymphomas by using the following primers: F1: TCAAGTGCCTTCTGTAGTGTGAA; R1: CATAAAGGTTCTGCTCCAACATC; F2: GAGTGCTTCCAGCACAAGAAC; R2: TAACAGGTCAATGAACTCCCG; F3: GGACAAAGACAACTAGGTTTTTCAA; R3: TGGTAGTTTAGTATGGAGACTTCGG; F4: CCAATCCCGAAGTCTCCATA; R4: TGGTTGTTGCCTCATCACAT; F5: GCATGCAGCTGTGATTCCT; R5: GTGTCCAAGGTGTTGGTGC; F6: CAAGCGTGTCAAGGAGAACA; R6: AGCTCCCTGAAGAGTGTCCA; F7: CAGTCACCATTCGTCCTCCT; R7: GGTCTCTTCTCCGCTCTCAA. PCR products were purified by gel electrophoresis and sequenced by Quintarabio (www.quintarabio.com).

Detection of Hipk2 mRNA expression using Taqman assay

Total RNAs from all tumors and three normal thymuses were used to assess Hipk2 mRNA expression by TaqMan Assays-on-Demand (Mm00439329_m1), purchased from Applied Biosystems (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Hipk2 expression was measured using the ABI PRISM 7700 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). PCR reactions were performed in triplicate for each sample and experiments were repeated a minimum of three times. Ct values were normalized against β-actin RNA (ΔCt=Ct of Hipk2−Ct of β-actin). The relative Hipk2 expression was calculated by 2^(−ΔΔCt), where ΔΔCt=(ΔCt of sample)−(average ΔCt of three normal thymuses).

Statistical analysis

The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare the expression levels of Hipk2 between tumors with LOH and retention of heterozygosity. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to compare the survival time post-radiation between different groups of genotypes of mice using the SPSS statistical package (SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA).
  16 in total

1.  High mobility group I (Y) proteins bind HIPK2, a serine-threonine kinase protein which inhibits cell growth.

Authors:  G M Pierantoni; M Fedele; F Pentimalli; G Benvenuto; R Pero; G Viglietto; M Santoro; L Chiariotti; A Fusco
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2001-09-27       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Homeodomain-interacting protein kinase-2 phosphorylates p53 at Ser 46 and mediates apoptosis.

Authors:  Gabriella D'Orazi; Barbara Cecchinelli; Tiziana Bruno; Isabella Manni; Yuichiro Higashimoto; Shin'ichi Saito; Monica Gostissa; Sabrina Coen; Alessandra Marchetti; Giannino Del Sal; Guilia Piaggio; Maurizio Fanciulli; Ettore Appella; Silvia Soddu
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  Fbxw7/Cdc4 is a p53-dependent, haploinsufficient tumour suppressor gene.

Authors:  Jian-Hua Mao; Jesus Perez-Losada; Di Wu; Reyno Delrosario; Ryosuke Tsunematsu; Keiichi I Nakayama; Ken Brown; Sheila Bryson; Allan Balmain
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Genome-wide detection of chromosomal imbalances in tumors using BAC microarrays.

Authors:  Wei-Wen Cai; Jian-Hua Mao; Chi-Wen Chow; Shamsha Damani; Allan Balmain; Allan Bradley
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 2 is the ionizing radiation-activated p53 serine 46 kinase and is regulated by ATM.

Authors:  Ilka Dauth; Jana Krüger; Thomas G Hofmann
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Crosstalk between Aurora-A and p53: frequent deletion or downregulation of Aurora-A in tumors from p53 null mice.

Authors:  Jian-Hua Mao; Di Wu; Jesus Perez-Losada; Tao Jiang; Qian Li; Richard M Neve; Joe W Gray; Wei-Wen Cai; Allan Balmain
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 31.743

7.  Homeodomain interacting protein kinase 2 promotes apoptosis by downregulating the transcriptional corepressor CtBP.

Authors:  Qinghong Zhang; Yasuhiro Yoshimatsu; Jeffrey Hildebrand; Steven M Frisch; Richard H Goodman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-10-17       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Differential sensitivity of v-Myb and c-Myb to Wnt-1-induced protein degradation.

Authors:  Chie Kanei-Ishii; Teruaki Nomura; Jun Tanikawa; Emi Ichikawa-Iwata; Shunsuke Ishii
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-08-11       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Targeted disruption of the murine homeodomain-interacting protein kinase-2 causes growth deficiency in vivo and cell cycle arrest in vitro.

Authors:  Francesco Trapasso; Rami I Aqeilan; Rodolfo Iuliano; Rosa Visone; Eugenio Gaudio; Laura Ciuffini; Hansjuerg Alder; Francesco Paduano; Giovanna Maria Pierantoni; Silvia Soddu; Carlo M Croce; Alfredo Fusco
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.311

10.  HIPK2 neutralizes MDM2 inhibition rescuing p53 transcriptional activity and apoptotic function.

Authors:  Valeria Di Stefano; Giovanni Blandino; Ada Sacchi; Silvia Soddu; Gabriella D'Orazi
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 9.867

View more
  23 in total

1.  The Trp53 delta proline (Trp53ΔP) mouse exhibits increased genome instability and susceptibility to radiation-induced, but not spontaneous, tumor development.

Authors:  Cassandra J Adams; Jennifer S Yu; Jian-Hua Mao; Kuang-Yu Jen; Sylvain V Costes; Mark Wade; Jocelyn Shoemake; Olulanu H Aina; Reyno Del Rosario; Phuong Thuy Menchavez; Robert D Cardiff; Geoffrey M Wahl; Allan Balmain
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.784

2.  Identification of Hipk2 as an essential regulator of white fat development.

Authors:  Jonas Sjölund; Facundo G Pelorosso; David A Quigley; Reyno DelRosario; Allan Balmain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Posttranslational modifications regulate HIPK2, a driver of proliferative diseases.

Authors:  Vera V Saul; M Lienhard Schmitz
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Src kinase modulates the apoptotic p53 pathway by altering HIPK2 localization.

Authors:  Tilman Polonio-Vallon; Joanna Kirkpatrick; Jeroen Krijgsveld; Thomas G Hofmann
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 5.  The Cell-Cycle Arrest and Apoptotic Functions of p53 in Tumor Initiation and Progression.

Authors:  Jiandong Chen
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 6.915

6.  Autophosphorylation and Pin1 binding coordinate DNA damage-induced HIPK2 activation and cell death.

Authors:  Nadja Bitomsky; Elisa Conrad; Christian Moritz; Tilman Polonio-Vallon; Dirk Sombroek; Kathrin Schultheiss; Carolina Glas; Vera Greiner; Christoph Herbel; Fiamma Mantovani; Giannino del Sal; Francesca Peri; Thomas G Hofmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Targeting COX-2/PGE(2) pathway in HIPK2 knockdown cancer cells: impact on dendritic cell maturation.

Authors:  Alessia Garufi; Giuseppa Pistritto; Claudia Ceci; Livia Di Renzo; Roberta Santarelli; Alberto Faggioni; Mara Cirone; Gabriella D'Orazi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  HIPK2 phosphorylates HDAC3 for NF-κB acetylation to ameliorate colitis-associated colorectal carcinoma and sepsis.

Authors:  Fang Zhang; Linlin Qi; Qiuyun Feng; Baokai Zhang; Xiangyue Li; Chang Liu; Weiyun Li; Qiaojie Liu; Dan Yang; Yue Yin; Chao Peng; Han Wu; Zhao-Hui Tang; Xi Zhou; Zou Xiang; Zhijiang Zhang; Hongyan Wang; Bin Wei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Updates on HIPK2: a resourceful oncosuppressor for clearing cancer.

Authors:  Gabriella D'Orazi; Cinzia Rinaldo; Silvia Soddu
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-08-13

10.  Glucose restriction induces cell death in parental but not in homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 2-depleted RKO colon cancer cells: molecular mechanisms and implications for tumor therapy.

Authors:  A Garufi; A Ricci; D Trisciuoglio; E Iorio; G Carpinelli; G Pistritto; M Cirone; G D'Orazi
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 8.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.