OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to use previously described quantitative evaluation methods to compare the performance of 3D gradient-recalled echo (GRE) and magnetization-prepared (MP) GRE in-phase and out-of phase sequences with standard 2D GRE technique in the characterization of adrenal lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study sample consisted of 44 consecutively registered patients (22 men, 22 women; mean age, 59.1 ± 11.6 years) with 50 adrenal lesions who underwent standard abdominal MRI that included in-phase and out-of-phase 2D GRE (n = 41), 3D GRE (n = 35), MP GRE (n = 36), or a combination of these techniques. The adrenal signal intensity (SI) index and adrenal-to-spleen, adrenal-to-liver, and adrenal-to-muscle SI ratios of each lesion were calculated and compared for the three techniques by independent samples Student t test. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for each evaluation method was determined, and comparisons of independent ROC curves were performed for all sequences. RESULTS: For all sequences, the mean adrenal SI index and SI ratios of adenomas and nonadenomas differed significantly (p < 0.001). For the 3D GRE and MP GRE techniques, adrenal SI index and modified adrenal-to-spleen ratio, respectively, had the larger AUCs, but the difference was not statistically significant. Different thresholds for the three techniques were recommended for discriminating adenoma from nonadenoma. CONCLUSION: The results of characterization of adrenal lesions with MP GRE and 3D GRE in-phase and out-of-phase MRI techniques are comparable to those obtained with the reference standard 2D GRE technique. Different thresholds should be selected according to the in-phase and out-of-phase techniques used and for the various evaluation methods.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to use previously described quantitative evaluation methods to compare the performance of 3D gradient-recalled echo (GRE) and magnetization-prepared (MP) GRE in-phase and out-of phase sequences with standard 2D GRE technique in the characterization of adrenal lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study sample consisted of 44 consecutively registered patients (22 men, 22 women; mean age, 59.1 ± 11.6 years) with 50 adrenal lesions who underwent standard abdominal MRI that included in-phase and out-of-phase 2D GRE (n = 41), 3D GRE (n = 35), MP GRE (n = 36), or a combination of these techniques. The adrenal signal intensity (SI) index and adrenal-to-spleen, adrenal-to-liver, and adrenal-to-muscle SI ratios of each lesion were calculated and compared for the three techniques by independent samples Student t test. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for each evaluation method was determined, and comparisons of independent ROC curves were performed for all sequences. RESULTS: For all sequences, the mean adrenal SI index and SI ratios of adenomas and nonadenomas differed significantly (p < 0.001). For the 3D GRE and MP GRE techniques, adrenal SI index and modified adrenal-to-spleen ratio, respectively, had the larger AUCs, but the difference was not statistically significant. Different thresholds for the three techniques were recommended for discriminating adenoma from nonadenoma. CONCLUSION: The results of characterization of adrenal lesions with MP GRE and 3D GRE in-phase and out-of-phase MRI techniques are comparable to those obtained with the reference standard 2D GRE technique. Different thresholds should be selected according to the in-phase and out-of-phase techniques used and for the various evaluation methods.
Authors: António P Matos; Fernanda Velloni; Miguel Ramalho; Mamdoh AlObaidy; Aruna Rajapaksha; Richard C Semelka Journal: World J Hepatol Date: 2015-08-08
Authors: António P Matos; Richard C Semelka; Vasco Herédia; Mamdoh AlObaidiy; Filipe Veloso Gomes; Miguel Ramalho Journal: Radiol Bras Date: 2017 Jan-Feb