BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Interferon (IFN) and pegylated-IFN treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in hemodialysis patients result in sustained virological response (SVR) rates of 45% and 37%, respectively. Although most nonhemodialysis patients who achieve SVR remain persistently viral negative, the durability of SVR in hemodialysis patients is unknown. We analyzed the rate of long-term virological negativity in hemodialysis patients who achieved SVR after IFN or pegylated-IFN through analysis of patient-level data. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: After performing a systematic literature review for IFN-based treatment of hemodialysis patients with chronic HCV infection, we extracted patient-level data on patients who achieved SVR. We performed life table analysis to estimate long-term virological negativity rates after SVR in patients who continued on hemodialysis or subsequently underwent kidney transplantation. RESULTS: Long-term HCV RNA outcomes following SVR were available for 121 hemodialysis patients (20 studies) and 45 patients who subsequently underwent transplantation (11 studies). The probability of remaining HCV RNA negative was 86% (95% confidence interval, 77% to 96%) for patients followed on hemodialysis 48 months after SVR and 95% (95% confidence interval, 89% to 100%) for kidney recipients followed 48 months after transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Viral negativity from IFN-based HCV treatment in hemodialysis patient appears durable during extended follow-up, including after kidney transplantation. The certainty of the viral negativity estimate is limited by the small number with follow-up beyond 48 months or longer. Transplantation does not confer an increased risk of relapse. Future research should investigate whether IFN-based treatment improves clinical outcomes for hemodialysis patients.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Interferon (IFN) and pegylated-IFN treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in hemodialysis patients result in sustained virological response (SVR) rates of 45% and 37%, respectively. Although most nonhemodialysis patients who achieve SVR remain persistently viral negative, the durability of SVR in hemodialysis patients is unknown. We analyzed the rate of long-term virological negativity in hemodialysis patients who achieved SVR after IFN or pegylated-IFN through analysis of patient-level data. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: After performing a systematic literature review for IFN-based treatment of hemodialysis patients with chronic HCV infection, we extracted patient-level data on patients who achieved SVR. We performed life table analysis to estimate long-term virological negativity rates after SVR in patients who continued on hemodialysis or subsequently underwent kidney transplantation. RESULTS: Long-term HCV RNA outcomes following SVR were available for 121 hemodialysis patients (20 studies) and 45 patients who subsequently underwent transplantation (11 studies). The probability of remaining HCV RNA negative was 86% (95% confidence interval, 77% to 96%) for patients followed on hemodialysis 48 months after SVR and 95% (95% confidence interval, 89% to 100%) for kidney recipients followed 48 months after transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Viral negativity from IFN-based HCV treatment in hemodialysis patient appears durable during extended follow-up, including after kidney transplantation. The certainty of the viral negativity estimate is limited by the small number with follow-up beyond 48 months or longer. Transplantation does not confer an increased risk of relapse. Future research should investigate whether IFN-based treatment improves clinical outcomes for hemodialysis patients.
Authors: S Bruno; P M Battezzati; G Bellati; A Manzin; M Maggioni; A Crosignani; M Borzio; L Solforosi; A Morabito; G Ideo; M Podda Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: J M Campistol; N Esforzado; J Martínez; L Roselló; L Veciana; J Modol; J Casellas; M Pons; X de Las Cuevas; J Piera; J A Oliva; J Costa; J M Barrera; M Bruguera Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: T Casanovas-Taltavull; C Baliellas; C Benasco; T T Serrano; A Casanova; J L Pérez; L Guerrero; M T González; E Andres; S Gil-Vernet; L A Casais Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: M Espinosa; M Rodriguez; A Martin-Malo; M A Alvarez de Lara; R Gonzalez; F Lopez-Rubio; M de la Mata; P Aljama Journal: Clin Nephrol Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 0.975
Authors: C Hanrotel; O Toupance; S Lavaud; G Thiefin; V Brodard; D Ingrand; M D Diebold; A Wynckel; J Chanard Journal: Nephron Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 2.847
Authors: D F Stroup; J A Berlin; S C Morton; I Olkin; G D Williamson; D Rennie; D Moher; B J Becker; T A Sipe; S B Thacker Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-04-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Craig E Gordon; Katrin Uhlig; Joseph Lau; Christopher H Schmid; Andrew S Levey; John B Wong Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2009-07-30 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Michelle M O'Shaughnessy; John A O'Regan; Frank E Murray; Jeff A Connell; Margaret P Duffy; Veronica M Francis; Sharon Dwyer; Lelia M Thornton; Peter J Conlon Journal: Clin Kidney J Date: 2012-04-18