| Literature DB >> 21784152 |
Junichiro Sageshima1, Gaetano Ciancio, Giselle Guerra, Jeffrey J Gaynor, Deborah Cova, Alberto Zarak, Linda Chen, Adela Mattiazzi, Warren Kupin, David Roth, Lois Hanson, Alan S Livingstone, Phillip Ruiz, George W Burke.
Abstract
Although antibody induction has gained in popularity, two agents are rarely combined. We retrospectively analyzed peripheral lymphocyte phenotypes of renal transplant recipients who received induction therapy with a different antibody/combination: alemtuzumab(C1H), Thymoglobulin(rATG), daclizumab(Dac), rATG+C1H, and rATG+Dac. CD4+ T-cells were suppressed by C1H and rATG+C1H, as well as by rATG and rATG+Dac but to a lesser extent. The effect lasted for 3 years at around 40% of baseline values. CD8+ T-cells showed a similar trend but had a more rapid recovery to baseline. CD19+ B-cells were effectively suppressed for 2 months by C1H and rATG+C1H, and abruptly returned to baseline afterwards; suppression by rATG(7 doses) was modest but lasted longer. A higher proportion of CD56+CD16+ Natural Killer cells in C1H treated patients suggested a relatively spared effect of C1H on this cell type. Low CD25+ T-cells by 5-dose Dac returned to baseline around 6 months, whereas rATG+C1H and rATG+Dac showed persistent effect. CD4+CD25hi T-cells were suppressed by both rATG+C1H and rATG+Dac, but the initial proportion of CD4+CD25hi T-cells among CD4+ T-cells and CD4+CD25hi/CD4+CD25lo ratio were significantly higher in rATG+C1H. Overall, with extensive and persistent lymphocyte suppression by a simple administration of agents, single-dose rATG+C1H induction can be an alternative in renal transplantation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21784152 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2011.07.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transpl Immunol ISSN: 0966-3274 Impact factor: 1.708