Literature DB >> 21783649

The merits of in vitro versus in vivo modeling in investigation of the immune system.

Christopher C Silliman1, Michael Wang.   

Abstract

Immunity is vital for determining self and for the recognition and swift eradication of foreign antigens without harming the host. Innate immunity developed in metazoan, multi-cellular organisms under overwhelming selection pressure of invasive microbes and, although imperfect, has performed admirably to enable the evolution of higher eukaryotes. Adaptive immunity developed within an existing innate immune system to more effectively eradicate foreign antigens, whether from pathogens, malignant cells, or microbial toxins, such that repeated stimulations with foreign antigens are more efficiently excluded. Investigation of the immune system requires both in vivo and in vitro experimentation, not only because of the inherent complexity of immunity and the required pertinence of using higher mammals to not falsely disrupt the immune system, but also to use isolates of the specific cellular and humoral components to determine function, signal transduction, and a possible role of these constituents without the complexity and redundancy of immunity in intact animals. The hypotheses of well-designed in vitro experiments must also be tested in intact in vivo models to determine relevance and to discard artifactual findings secondary to the in vitro environment. The following review outlines the basic constituents and functions of both adaptive and innate immunity to demonstrate the importance of both in vivo and in vitro investigation of immunity in our attempt to define host defense and to decrease morbidity and mortality in humans.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 21783649     DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2005.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 1382-6689            Impact factor:   4.860


  4 in total

1.  Immunosenescence in some but not all immune components in a free-living vertebrate, the tree swallow.

Authors:  Maria G Palacios; Joan E Cunnick; David W Winkler; Carol M Vleck
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  In vitro evaluation of TLR4 agonist activity: formulation effects.

Authors:  Ayesha Misquith; H W Millie Fung; Quinton M Dowling; Jeffrey A Guderian; Thomas S Vedvick; Christopher B Fox
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 5.268

3.  In vitro versus in vivo models of kidney fibrosis: Time-course experimental design is crucial to avoid misinterpretations of gene expression data.

Authors:  Shiva Moein; Kobra Moradzadeh; Shaghayegh Haghjooy Javanmard; Seyed Mahdi Nasiri; Yousof Gheisari
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Toxicology in the fast lane: application of high-throughput bioassays to detect modulation of key enzymes and receptors.

Authors:  Christophe Morisseau; Oleg Merzlikin; Amy Lin; Guochun He; Wei Feng; Isela Padilla; Michael S Denison; Isaac N Pessah; Bruce D Hammock
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 9.031

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.