BACKGROUND: The performance of transient elastography in primary biliary cirrhosis has yet to be fully established. AIM: To assess: (1) the performance of transient elastography in identifying significant fibrosis in primary biliary cirrhosis by comparison with surrogate markers (AST platelet ratio index (APRI), FIB-4, Fibroindex, Forns, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ratio); (2) the correlation between liver stiffness and Mayo score prognostic index. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients with primary biliary cirrhosis were consecutively enrolled. The performance of each marker and of liver stiffness was compared with histological staging and METAVIR at time of liver biopsy. RESULTS: The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) of liver stiffness were 0.87, 0.88, 0.99 for histological stage ≥II, ≥III and =IV and 0.89, 0.92, 0.99 for METAVIR ≥2, ≥3 and =4. Transient elastography alone proved better able in identifying any grade of fibrosis or cirrhosis than noninvasive markers. Combining each surrogate marker with transient elastography did not improve the area under ROC. Transient elastography correlated positively with the Mayo score (P<0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that transient elastography was associated with an advanced fibrosis (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Transient elastography proved a simple, reliable and useful method for assessing liver fibrosis in primary biliary cirrhosis, whereas noninvasive surrogate markers proved unsatisfactory in predicting significant fibrosis.
BACKGROUND: The performance of transient elastography in primary biliary cirrhosis has yet to be fully established. AIM: To assess: (1) the performance of transient elastography in identifying significant fibrosis in primary biliary cirrhosis by comparison with surrogate markers (AST platelet ratio index (APRI), FIB-4, Fibroindex, Forns, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ratio); (2) the correlation between liver stiffness and Mayo score prognostic index. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients with primary biliary cirrhosis were consecutively enrolled. The performance of each marker and of liver stiffness was compared with histological staging and METAVIR at time of liver biopsy. RESULTS: The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) of liver stiffness were 0.87, 0.88, 0.99 for histological stage ≥II, ≥III and =IV and 0.89, 0.92, 0.99 for METAVIR ≥2, ≥3 and =4. Transient elastography alone proved better able in identifying any grade of fibrosis or cirrhosis than noninvasive markers. Combining each surrogate marker with transient elastography did not improve the area under ROC. Transient elastography correlated positively with the Mayo score (P<0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that transient elastography was associated with an advanced fibrosis (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Transient elastography proved a simple, reliable and useful method for assessing liver fibrosis in primary biliary cirrhosis, whereas noninvasive surrogate markers proved unsatisfactory in predicting significant fibrosis.
Authors: Paul Kennedy; Mathilde Wagner; Laurent Castéra; Cheng William Hong; Curtis L Johnson; Claude B Sirlin; Bachir Taouli Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: S Righi; E Fiorini; C De Molo; V Cipriano; F Cassani; L Muratori; M Lenzi; A M Morselli Labate; C Serra Journal: J Ultrasound Date: 2012-10-25
Authors: Martin Tibuakuu; Caroline Jjingo; Gregory Dale Kirk; David Lee Thomas; Ronald Gray; Victor Ssempijja; Fred Nalugoda; David Serwadda; Ponsiano Ocama; Christopher Kenneth Opio; David Erwin Kleiner; Thomas Charles Quinn; Steven James Reynolds Journal: J Viral Hepat Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 3.517
Authors: Hanno Ehlken; Raluca Wroblewski; Christophe Corpechot; Lionel Arrivé; Tim Rieger; Johannes Hartl; Susanne Lezius; Peter Hübener; Kornelius Schulze; Roman Zenouzi; Marcial Sebode; Moritz Peiseler; Ulrike W Denzer; Alexander Quaas; Christina Weiler-Normann; Ansgar W Lohse; Olivier Chazouilleres; Christoph Schramm Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Karim T Osman; Daniel B Maselli; Ilkay S Idilman; Daniel J Rowan; Jason K Viehman; William S Harmsen; Denise M Harnois; Elizabeth J Carey; Andrea A Gossard; Nicholas F LaRusso; Keith D Lindor; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; John E Eaton Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2021 May-Jun 01 Impact factor: 3.062
Authors: Mustafa Tahtaci; Oyku T Yurekli; Aylin D Bolat; Serdar Balci; Fatma E Akin; Naciye S Buyukasik; Osman Ersoy Journal: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 2.566