Literature DB >> 2178340

Comparative in vitro activities of a new quinolone, WIN 57273, and piperacillin plus tazobactam against anaerobic bacteria.

R A Venezia1, D M Yocum, E M Robbiano, R M Echols.   

Abstract

The in vitro activities of a new quinolone, WIN 57273, and the combination of piperacillin and tazobactam, a beta-lactamase inhibitor, were compared with those of cefoxitin, ceftizoxime, chloramphenicol, clindamycin, imipenem, metronidazole, and piperacillin for 123 clinical anaerobic isolates. Ceftizoxime and cefoxitin had equivalent activities, while metronidazole was active against gram-negative isolates. In the Bacteroides fragilis group, species other than B. fragilis were the most resistant. The combination of piperacillin with tazobactam in a ratio of 8 to 1 was more effective than piperacillin against B. fragilis group organisms when the MIC of piperacillin was greater than or equal to 64 micrograms/ml. Overall, WIN 57273 (i) and imipenem (ii) were the most active agents, with MICs for 50 and 90% of strains of (i) 0.25 and 0.5 and (ii) 0.125 and 2 microgram/ml, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2178340      PMCID: PMC171949          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.34.9.1858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  10 in total

Review 1.  Structure-activity relationships of the fluoroquinolones.

Authors:  D T Chu; P B Fernandes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards agar dilution susceptibility testing of anaerobic gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  W J Brown
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Comparison of in vitro antibiograms of Bacteroides fragilis group isolates: differences in resistance rates in two institutions because of differences in susceptibility testing methodology.

Authors:  K E Aldridge; H M Wexler; C V Sanders; S M Finegold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Comparative in vitro activity of a new quinolone, AM-1091.

Authors:  H C Neu; A Novelli; N X Chin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Mode of action of the quinolone antimicrobial agents: review of recent information.

Authors:  D C Hooper; J S Wolfson
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug

6.  In-vitro activity of amoxycillin and ticarcillin in combination with clavulanic acid compared with that of new beta-lactam agents against species of the Bacteroides fragilis group.

Authors:  A M Bourgault; F Lamothe
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  In-vitro and in-vivo potency of five new fluoroquinolones against anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  P B Fernandes; N Shipkowitz; R R Bower; K P Jarvis; J Weisz; D T Chu
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Effect of clavulanic acid on the activities of ten beta-lactam agents against members of the Bacteroides fragilis group.

Authors:  F Lamothe; F Auger; J M Lacroix
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  In vitro susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to ciprofloxacin (Bay o 9867).

Authors:  R H Prabhala; B Rao; R Marshall; M B Bansal; H Thadepalli
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group in the United States: analysis by site of isolation.

Authors:  G J Cuchural; F P Tally; N V Jacobus; K Aldridge; T Cleary; S M Finegold; G Hill; P Iannini; J P O'Keefe; C Pierson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.191

  10 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Current antimicrobial therapy of anaerobic infections.

Authors:  C V Sanders; K E Aldridge
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  In vitro activities of trovafloxacin against 557 strains of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  H M Wexler; E Molitoris; D Molitoris; S M Finegold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Increased activity of a new chlorofluoroquinolone, BAY y 3118, compared with activities of ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin, and other antimicrobial agents against anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  K E Aldridge
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Quinolone activity against anaerobes: microbiological aspects.

Authors:  P C Appelbaum
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  In vitro activity of Bay Y3118 against anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  H M Wexler; E Molitoris; S M Finegold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Piperacillin/tazobactam. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  H M Bryson; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 9.546

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.