Literature DB >> 21783304

Sex and ear differences in spontaneous and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in young adults.

Adrian W K Snihur1, Elizabeth Hampson.   

Abstract

Effects of sex and handedness on the production of spontaneous and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) were explored in a non-hearing impaired population (ages 17-25 years). A sex difference in OAEs, either produced spontaneously (spontaneous OAEs or SOAEs) or in response to auditory stimuli (click-evoked OAEs or CEOAEs) has been reported in infants and children, but healthy young adults seldom have been the target of study. In the current data, a robust sexual dimorphism was confirmed, with women producing more numerous and stronger SOAEs, and CEOAEs with greater response amplitude compared to men. A right-ear advantage was found for the number of SOAEs produced and, in women, for SOAE power. Although handedness did not moderate the ear asymmetry in production, exploratory analyses revealed that departures from strong right hand preference were associated in the present sample with reduced numbers or strengths of OAEs. The results are discussed with respect to differential exposure to androgens during prenatal development.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21783304     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  11 in total

Review 1.  Auditory function and dysfunction: estrogen makes a difference.

Authors:  Amandine Delhez; Philippe Lefebvre; Christel Péqueux; Brigitte Malgrange; Laurence Delacroix
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Otoacoustic emissions, auditory evoked potentials and self-reported gender in people affected by disorders of sex development (DSD).

Authors:  Amy B Wisniewski; Blas Espinoza-Varas; Christopher E Aston; Shelagh Edmundson; Craig A Champlin; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 3.  Estrogenic modulation of auditory processing: a vertebrate comparison.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 8.606

4.  Sexual Dimorphism in the Functional Development of the Cochlear Amplifier in Humans.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Samantha Zambrano; Hansapani Rodrigo
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  Hearing thresholds, tinnitus, and headphone listening habits in nine-year-old children.

Authors:  Sara Båsjö; Claes Möller; Stephen Widén; Göran Jutengren; Kim Kähäri
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Association Between Sex and Speech Auditory Brainstem Responses in Adults, and Relationship to Sex Hormone Levels.

Authors:  Jinfeng Liu; Dan Wang; Xiaoting Li; Wang Ningyu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-05-14

7.  Do sex differences in CEOAEs and 2D:4D ratios reflect androgen exposure? A study in women with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome.

Authors:  Judy van Hemmen; Peggy T Cohen-Kettenis; Thomas D Steensma; Dick J Veltman; Julie Bakker
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.027

8.  Right Ear Advantage of Speech Audiometry in Single-sided Deafness.

Authors:  Vincent G Wettstein; Rudolf Probst
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Sex differences in auditory brainstem response audiograms from vasopressin-deficient Brattleboro and wild-type Long-Evans rats.

Authors:  Payton E Charlton; Kelcie C Schatz; Kali Burke; Matthew J Paul; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sex Differences in Music: A Female Advantage at Recognizing Familiar Melodies.

Authors:  Scott A Miles; Robbin A Miranda; Michael T Ullman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.