Literature DB >> 21782875

Evaluation of research activities and research needs to increase the impact and applicability of alternative testing strategies in risk assessment practice.

Ans Punt1, Marie-Jeanne W A Schiffelers, G Jean Horbach, Johannes J M van de Sandt, Geny M M Groothuis, Ivonne M C M Rietjens, Bas J Blaauboer.   

Abstract

The present paper aims at identifying strategies to increase the impact and applicability of alternative testing strategies in risk assessment. To this end, a quantitative and qualitative literature evaluation was performed on (a) current research efforts in the development of in vitro methods aiming for alternatives to animal testing, (b) the possibilities and limitations of in vitro methods for regulatory purposes and (c) the potential of physiologically-based kinetic (PBK) modeling to improve the impact and applicability of in vitro methods in risk assessment practice. Overall, the evaluation showed that the focus of state-of-the-art research activities does not seem to be optimally directed at developing in vitro alternatives for those endpoints that are most animal-demanding, such as reproductive and developmental toxicity, and carcinogenicity. A key limitation in the application of in vitro alternatives to such systemic endpoints is that in vitro methods do not provide so-called points of departure, necessary for regulators to set safe exposure limits. PBK-modeling could contribute to overcoming this limitation by providing a method that allows extrapolation of in vitro concentration-response curves to in vivo dose-response curves. However, more proofs of principle are required.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21782875     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  5 in total

Review 1.  IVIVE: Facilitating the Use of In Vitro Toxicity Data in Risk Assessment and Decision Making.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Chang; Yu-Mei Tan; David G Allen; Shannon Bell; Paul C Brown; Lauren Browning; Patricia Ceger; Jeffery Gearhart; Pertti J Hakkinen; Shruti V Kabadi; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Annie Lumen; Joanna Matheson; Alicia Paini; Heather A Pangburn; Elijah J Petersen; Emily N Reinke; Alexandre J S Ribeiro; Nisha Sipes; Lisa M Sweeney; John F Wambaugh; Ronald Wange; Barbara A Wetmore; Moiz Mumtaz
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-05-01

2.  Characterization of the chemical reactivity and nephrotoxicity of N-acetyl-S-(1,2-dichlorovinyl)-L-cysteine sulfoxide, a potential reactive metabolite of trichloroethylene.

Authors:  Roy M Irving; Marie E Pinkerton; Adnan A Elfarra
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Integrating in vitro data and physiologically based kinetic (PBK) modelling to assess the in vivo potential developmental toxicity of a series of phenols.

Authors:  Marije Strikwold; Bert Spenkelink; Laura H J de Haan; Ruud A Woutersen; Ans Punt; Ivonne M C M Rietjens
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  Quantitative in Vitro to in Vivo Extrapolation (QIVIVE) for Predicting Reduced Anogenital Distance Produced by Anti-Androgenic Pesticides in a Rodent Model for Male Reproductive Disorders.

Authors:  Martin Scholze; Camilla Taxvig; Andreas Kortenkamp; Julie Boberg; Sofie Christiansen; Terje Svingen; Karin Lauschke; Henrik Frandsen; Sibylle Ermler; Susan Strange Hermann; Mikael Pedersen; Anne Kruse Lykkeberg; Marta Axelstad; Anne Marie Vinggaard
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Investigating the state of physiologically based kinetic modelling practices and challenges associated with gaining regulatory acceptance of model applications.

Authors:  Alicia Paini; Jeremy A Leonard; Tomas Kliment; Yu-Mei Tan; Andrew Worth
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.271

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.