Literature DB >> 21782768

Anesthesiologist involvement in screening colonoscopy: temporal trends and cost implications in the medicare population.

Vijay S Khiani1, Pamela Soulos, John Gancayco, Cary P Gross.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Colonoscopy is a recommended component of screening for colorectal cancer. We conducted a retrospective study of Medicare data to determine the frequency of anesthesiologist involvement and to identify patient and provider characteristics and cost implications associated with anesthesiologist involvement.
METHODS: We used the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare dataset to identify patients without cancer who received a screening colonoscopy examination from July 2001 through 2006 (n = 16,268). The outcome variable was anesthesiologist involvement, which was identified by searching Medicare claims. Logistic regression was used to explore the association between patient and provider characteristics and anesthesiologist involvement. Costs associated with the use of an anesthesiologist were derived based on a cost assessment by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
RESULTS: Of the screening colonoscopies assessed, 17.2% involved an anesthesiologist. The screening colonoscopy rate more than doubled during the study period. The frequency of anesthesiologist involvement increased from 11.0% of screening colonoscopies in 2001 to 23.4% in 2006. Surgeons involved an anesthesiologist in 24.2% of colonoscopies, compared with 18.0% of gastroenterologists and 11.3% of primary care providers. The percentage of colonoscopies that involved an anesthesiologist varied among regions, ranging from 1.6% in San Francisco to 57.8% in New Jersey. Anesthesiologist involvement increased the cost by approximately 20% per screening colonoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: An increase in the involvement of anesthesiologists has significantly increased the cost of screening colonoscopies. Studies are needed to assess the effects of anesthesiologists on risks and benefits of colonoscopy, to determine the most safe and cost-effective approaches.
Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21782768      PMCID: PMC3214600          DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  15 in total

Review 1.  Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Somnath Saha; Tom Hoerger; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a case-control study.

Authors:  Shan-Rong Cai; Su-Zhan Zhang; Hong-Hong Zhu; Shu Zheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Position statement: nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol for GI endoscopy.

Authors:  John J Vargo; Lawrence B Cohen; Douglas K Rex; Paul Y Kwo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 4.  Colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  R Scott Nelson; Alan G Thorson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Effect of Medicare coverage on use of invasive colorectal cancer screening tests.

Authors:  Cynthia W Ko; William Kreuter; Laura-Mae Baldwin
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002 Dec 9-23

6.  What is most important to patients when deciding about colorectal screening?

Authors:  Avlin Imaeda; Danielle Bender; Liana Fraenkel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Sonnenberg; F Delcò; J M Inadomi
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-10-17       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  A population-based analysis of outpatient colonoscopy in adults assisted by an anesthesiologist.

Authors:  Othman Alharbi; Linda Rabeneck; Lawrence F Paszat; Duminda N Wijeysundera; Rinku Sutradhar; Lingsong Yun; Christopher M Vinden; Jill Tinmouth
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 9.  Endoscopist-directed administration of propofol: a worldwide safety experience.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Viju P Deenadayalu; Emely Eid; Thomas F Imperiale; John A Walker; Kuldip Sandhu; Anthony C Clarke; Lybus C Hillman; Akira Horiuchi; Lawrence B Cohen; Ludwig T Heuss; Shajan Peter; Christoph Beglinger; James A Sinnott; Thomas Welton; Magdy Rofail; Iyad Subei; Rodger Sleven; Paul Jordan; John Goff; Patrick D Gerstenberger; Harold Munnings; Martin Tagle; Brian W Sipe; Till Wehrmann; Jack A Di Palma; Kaitlin E Occhipinti; Egidio Barbi; Andrea Riphaus; Stephen T Amann; Gen Tohda; Timothy McClellan; Charles Thueson; John Morse; Nizam Meah
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Midazolam with meperidine or fentanyl for colonoscopy: results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Bu'Hussain Hayee; Jason Dunn; Aathavan Loganayagam; Mandy Wong; Vishal Saxena; David Rowbotham; Alistair McNair
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  26 in total

1.  Endoscopy services and training: a national survey of general surgeons.

Authors:  Daniel Skubleny; Noah Switzer; Shahzeer Karmali; Christopher de Gara
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Revenue from single-balloon enteroscopy is driven by anesthesia: experience from a tertiary care facility.

Authors:  Nikhil Banerjee; Michael Presta; Matthew Charous; Neil Gupta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Endoscopy in Canada: Proceedings of the National Roundtable.

Authors:  Noah Switzer; Elijah Dixon; Jill Tinmouth; Nori Bradley; Melina Vassiliou; Steve Schwaitzberg; Tony Gomes; James Ellsmere; Chris de Gara
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-04-17

4.  Validation of 5 key colonoscopy-related data elements from Ontario health administrative databases compared to the clinical record: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jill Tinmouth; Rinku Sutradhar; Ning Liu; Nancy N Baxter; Lawrence Paszat; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-08-13

5.  Propofol administration by endoscopists versus anesthesiologists in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient safety outcomes.

Authors:  Julian F Daza; Carolyn M Tan; Ryan J Fielding; Allison Brown; Forough Farrokhyar; Ilun Yang
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  A Systematic Review of Factors Associated With Utilization of Monitored Anesthesia Care for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Authors:  Megan A Adams; Ashraf Saleh; Joel H Rubenstein
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2016-06

7.  Anesthetist-Directed Sedation Favors Success of Advanced Endoscopic Procedures.

Authors:  James Buxbaum; Nitzan Roth; Nima Motamedi; Terrance Lee; Paul Leonor; Mark Salem; Dolores Gibbs; John Vargo
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 8.  Can Technology Improve the Quality of Colonoscopy?

Authors:  Selvi Thirumurthi; William A Ross; Gottumukkala S Raju
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-07

9.  Holding Gastroenterologists Accountable for Colonoscopy Through MACRA Episode-Based Cost Measure.

Authors:  Shazia Mehmood Siddique; Shivan J Mehta
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Complications following colonoscopy with anesthesia assistance: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Gregory S Cooper; Tzuyung D Kou; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 21.873

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.