Literature DB >> 21782736

Chemical mixture toxicology: from descriptive to mechanistic, and going on to in silico toxicology.

Raymond S H Yang1, Hisham A El-Masri, Russell S Thomas, Ivan D Dobrev, James E Dennison, Dong-Soon Bae, Julie A Campain, Kai H Liao, Brad Reisfeld, Melvin E Andersen, Moiz Mumtaz.   

Abstract

Because of the pioneering vision of certain leaders in the biomedical field, the last two decades witnessed rapid advances in the area of chemical mixture toxicology. Earlier studies utilized conventional toxicology protocol and methods, and they were mainly descriptive in nature. Two good examples might be the parallel series of studies conducted by the U.S. National Toxicology Program and TNO in The Netherlands, respectively. As a natural course of progression, more and more sophistication was incorporated into the toxicology studies of chemical mixtures. Thus, at least the following seven areas of scientific achievements in chemical mixture toxicology are evident in the literature: (a) the application of better and more robust statistical methods; (b) the exploration and incorporation of mechanistic bases for toxicological interactions; (c) the application of physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) modeling; (d) the studies on more complex chemical mixtures; (e) the use of science-based risk assessment approaches; (f) the utilization of functional genomics; and (g) the application of technology. Examples are given for the discussion of each of these areas. Two important concepts emerged from these studies and they are: (1) dose-dependent toxicologic interactions; and (2) "interaction thresholds". Looking into the future, one of the most challenging areas in chemical mixture research is finding the answer to the question "when one tries to characterize the health effects of chemical mixtures, how does one deal with the infinite number of combination of chemicals, and other possible stressors?" Undoubtedly, there will be many answers from different groups of researchers. Our answer, however, is first to focus on the finite (biological processes) rather than the infinite (combinations of chemical mixtures and multiple stressors). The idea is that once we know a normal biological process(es), all stimuli and insults from external stressors are merely perturbations of the normal biological process(es). The next step is to "capture" the biological process(es) by integrating the recent advances in computational technology and modern biology. Here, the computer-assisted Reaction Network Modeling, linked with PBPK modeling, offers a ray of hope to dealing with the complex biological systems.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 21782736     DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2004.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 1382-6689            Impact factor:   4.860


  8 in total

1.  A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model of rifampin in mice.

Authors:  Michael A Lyons; Brad Reisfeld; Raymond S H Yang; Anne J Lenaerts
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Computational pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of rifampin in a mouse tuberculosis infection model.

Authors:  Michael A Lyons; Anne J Lenaerts
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  A biology-based approach for mixture toxicity of multiple endpoints over the life cycle.

Authors:  Tjalling Jager; Tine Vandenbrouck; Jan Baas; Wim M De Coen; Sebastiaan A L M Kooijman
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Toxicity of diatom-derived polyunsaturated aldehyde mixtures on sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus development.

Authors:  Nadia Ruocco; Concetta Annunziata; Adrianna Ianora; Giovanni Libralato; Loredana Manfra; Susan Costantini; Maria Costantini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Metabolite Changes in an Estuarine Annelid Following Sublethal Exposure to a Mixture of Zinc and Boscalid.

Authors:  Georgia M Sinclair; Allyson L O'Brien; Michael Keough; David P de Souza; Saravanan Dayalan; Komal Kanojia; Konstantinos Kouremenos; Dedreia L Tull; Rhys A Coleman; Oliver A H Jones; Sara M Long
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2019-10-15

Review 6.  Principles of dose-setting in toxicology studies: the importance of kinetics for ensuring human safety.

Authors:  C J Borgert; C Fuentes; L D Burgoon
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  Potentiation of Sodium Metabisulfite Toxicity by Propylene Glycol in Both in Vitro and in Vivo Systems.

Authors:  Jean Yoo; Yeon-Mi Lim; Haewon Kim; Eun-Ji Kim; Doo-Hee Lee; Byeongwoo Lee; Pilje Kim; Seung Do Yu; Hyun-Mi Kim; Byung-Il Yoon; Ilseob Shim
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 8.  Bridging the Data Gap From in vitro Toxicity Testing to Chemical Safety Assessment Through Computational Modeling.

Authors:  Qiang Zhang; Jin Li; Alistair Middleton; Sudin Bhattacharya; Rory B Conolly
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-09-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.