Literature DB >> 21782118

Breast tomosynthesis.

Felix Diekmann1, Ulrich Bick.   

Abstract

Digital mammography has been well-evaluated for the diagnosis of breast cancer. The scientific data show that mammography alone, especially in dense breast parenchyma, has its weaknesses. These weaknesses are due to the low contrast of tumors in comparison with the surrounding parenchyma and the overlying structures that mask tumors. The initial results from tomosynthesis studies show a tendency for better imaging and higher accuracy and lower recall rates with tomosynthesis. We present in this article a literature review of the development of breast tomosynthesis and follow it with case examples.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21782118     DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2011.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR        ISSN: 0887-2171            Impact factor:   1.875


  8 in total

1.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Breast cancer screening: an evidence-based update.

Authors:  Mackenzie S Fuller; Christoph I Lee; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.456

3.  Digital breast tomosynthesis versus mammography and breast ultrasound: a multireader performance study.

Authors:  Fabienne Thibault; Clarisse Dromain; Catherine Breucq; Corinne S Balleyguier; Caroline Malhaire; Luc Steyaert; Anne Tardivon; Enrica Baldan; Harir Drevon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Breast mass characterization using 3-dimensional automated ultrasound as an adjunct to digital breast tomosynthesis: a pilot study.

Authors:  Frederic Padilla; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Chintana Paramagul; Sumedha P Sinha; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Gerald L Le Carpentier; Heang-Ping Chan; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; J Brian Fowlkes; Annette D Joe; Katherine A Klein; Alexis V Nees; Mitra Noroozian; Stephanie K Patterson; Renee W Pinsky; Fong Ming Hooi; Paul L Carson
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 5.  Update on new technologies in digital mammography.

Authors:  Stephanie K Patterson; Marilyn A Roubidoux
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-08-14

6.  Mammography: an update of the EUSOBI recommendations on information for women.

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli; Eva M Fallenberg; Paola Clauser; Rubina M Trimboli; Julia Camps-Herrero; Thomas H Helbich; Gabor Forrai
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2016-11-16

7.  Comparing the diagnostic efficacy of full field digital mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis using BIRADS score in a tertiary cancer care hospital.

Authors:  Divya Singla; Arvind K Chaturvedi; Abhinav Aggarwal; S A Rao; Dibyamohan Hazarika; Vivek Mahawar
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

8.  Retrieval of 3D information in X-ray dark-field imaging with a large field of view.

Authors:  Jana Andrejewski; Fabio De Marco; Konstantin Willer; Wolfgang Noichl; Theresa Urban; Manuela Frank; Alex Gustschin; Pascal Meyer; Thomas Koehler; Franz Pfeiffer; Julia Herzen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.