Literature DB >> 21781636

Safety and efficacy evaluation of TRUE TEST panels 1.1, 2.1, and 3.1 in children and adolescents.

Sharon E Jacob1, Elise M Herro, Kim Sullivan, Catalina Matiz, Lawrence Eichenfield, Curt Hamann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Thin-layer Rapid Use Epicutaneous (TRUE) Test has approval for adults.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TRUE Test panels 1.1, 2.1, and 3.1 in children and adolescents suspected of having allergic contact dermatitis (ACD).
METHODS: An open-label prospective study was performed, analyzing 102 consecutive patients aged 6 to 18 years referred for suspected ACD, between December 2008 and October 2009. Patch tests were applied for 48 hours, and evaluations of skin reactions were conducted at days 3 and 7, with a follow-up visit 3 weeks after the initial applications.
RESULTS: The mean age of all enrolled subjects was 11.6 years, and subjects included 52% females and 48% males. Positive reactions noted in more than 10% of the children were to nickel sulfate (29.7%), p-tert-butylphenol formaldehyde resin (16.8%), wool alcohols (15.8%), fragrance mix (12.9%), and cobalt dichloride (12.9%). Of the 101 subjects, 77 (76.2%) tested positive to one or more of the 28 allergens. No meaningful differences were observed in the frequency or severity of adverse events; reports of burning and stinging following patch removal; or the frequency, intensity, or symptoms of persistent reactions when evaluated by age, sex, or race.
CONCLUSION: Patch testing is efficacious and safe in the pediatric population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21781636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatitis        ISSN: 1710-3568            Impact factor:   4.845


  10 in total

Review 1.  Allergic contact dermatitis in children: review of the past decade.

Authors:  Shehla Admani; Sharon E Jacob
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.806

2.  Invited commentary: recommendation for a north american pediatric patch test series.

Authors:  Sharon E Jacob; Shehla Admani; Elise M Herro
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 3.  Allergic Contact Dermatitis Evaluation: Strategies for the Preschooler.

Authors:  Calvin T Sung; Maria A McGowan; Sharon E Jacob
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 4.  Current strategies in treating severe contact dermatitis in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Luz S Fonacier; Marcella R Aquino; Tania Mucci
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.806

5.  Contact allergen sensitivity in children with contact dermatitis.

Authors:  Esra Yücel; Deniz Özçeker
Journal:  Turk Arch Pediatr       Date:  2021-01-01

Review 6.  Patch-test results in children and adolescents: systematic review of a 15-year period.

Authors:  Dulcilea Ferraz Rodrigues; Eugênio Marcos Andrade Goulart
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.896

Review 7.  What We Have Learned-Milestones in Pediatric Contact Dermatitis.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dupuy; Melanie Miller; Nicole Harter
Journal:  Curr Dermatol Rep       Date:  2022-03-26

8.  Patch test results in children and adolescents. Study from the Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte Dermatology Clinic, Brazil, from 2003 to 2010.

Authors:  Dulcilea Ferraz Rodrigues; Eugênio Marcos Andrade Goulart
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.896

9.  Patch test results in paediatric patients with atopic dermatitis in Laos.

Authors:  Catriona I Wootton; Mong K Sodaly; Somxay X Billamay; John S C English; Mayxay Mayfong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to lanolin: A ROAT study.

Authors:  Ada Uldahl; Malin Engfeldt; Cecilia Svedman
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 6.600

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.