| Literature DB >> 21781333 |
Abdel-Rahman N Zekri1, Abeer A Bahnassy, Mohamed M Hafez, Zeinab K Hassan, Mahmoud Kamel, Samah A Loutfy, Ghada M Sherif, Abdel-Rahman El-Zayadi, Sayed S Daoud.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To understand the complex and largely not well-understood apoptotic pathway and immune system evasion mechanisms in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and HCV associated chronic hepatitis (CH), we studied the expression patterns of a number of pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic genes (Fas, FasL, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL and Bak) in HepG2 cell line harboring HCV- genotype-4 replication. For confirmation, we also assessed the expression levels of the same group of genes in clinical samples obtained from 35 HCC and 34 CH patients.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21781333 PMCID: PMC3160349 DOI: 10.1186/1476-5926-10-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comp Hepatol ISSN: 1476-5926
Clinical features of the studied groups of patients.
| Variables | HCC | CH |
|---|---|---|
| Liver Function Test (Mean ± SD) | ||
| ALT | 77.2 ± 76.2 | 74.33 ± 30.97 |
| AST | 70.577 ± 49.4 | 81.66 ± 35.35 |
| Alk ph | 181.1 ± 174.2 | 111.57 ± 61.58 |
| Alb | 3.758 ± 0.707 | 3.9 ± 0.538 |
| T.Bil | 1.1846 ± 0.523 | 1.34 ± 0.897 |
| INR | 1.179 ± 0.067 | 1.22 ± 0.161 |
| Complete Blood Picture (Mean ± SD) | ||
| Hb | 12.3 ± 1.64 | 13.59 ± 2.24 |
| TLC | 6.186 ± 3.163 | 6.509 ± 2.05 |
| Plt | 177 ± 121 | 175.5 ± 67.267 |
| Viral marker | ||
| HBs-Ag | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| HCV-Ab | 35 (100) | 34 (100) |
| HBV-PCR | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| HCV-PCR | 35 (100) | 34 (100) |
| Tumor Marker (Mean ± SD) | ||
| Serum AFP | 1885 | 265 |
AFP, alpha fetoprotein; Alb, albumin; Alk, Alkaline Phosphates; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; CH, chronic hepatitis; Hb, hemoglobin; HBs-Ag, hepatitis B surface antigen; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HCV, hepatitis C virus; INR, International normalized ratio; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; Plt, platelet count; TLC, total leukocytic count; T.Bil, total bilirubin.
Primer sequences of the studied genes.
| Gene Name | Primer Sequence | Fragment Length |
|---|---|---|
| 5'-ACA CTG TGC CCA ACG AGG-3' | 621 bp | |
| 5'-GCAACACCAAGTGCAAAGAGG-3' | 265 bp | |
| 5'- ATGTTTCAGCTCTTCCACCTACAGA-3' | 255 bp | |
| 5'-TGATACCTGTGCTTTATCCC -3' | 250 bp | |
| 5' GCAGATCCAGGTGATTCTCG 3' | 234 bp | |
| 5'-CCCGGTGCTGCAGCATGTCCT -3' | 521 bp |
Figure 1(A): Non-infected HePG2 cells. (B): Infected HePG2 cells. Scale bar = 100 μm.
Figure 2Expression levels of the viral core and GAPDH. (A) The expression level of the viral core and GAPDH in HepG2 cells infected by HCV genotype-4 from day 1 to day 8. (B) The expression level of the viral core in HepG-2 cells infected by HCV genotype-4 from day 1 to day 8. Upper row show HCV-core expression in un-transfected cells. Lower row showed the HCV- core expression in siRNA-Z5 transfected cells.
Changes in apoptotic and pre apoptotic genes expression in HCV infected HepG2 cell line in vitro.
| Qualitative/Quantitative PCR (copy number/ml) | Apoptotic gene | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day1 | Positive/785 | Positive | - | + | +++ | - | |
| Day2 | Positive/Negative | Positive | - | + | + | - | |
| Day3 | Negative/Negative | Positive | - | + | ++ | - | |
| Day7 | Positive/13005 | Positive | - | + | + | - | - |
| Day14 | Positive/Negative | Positive | - | + | + | - | - |
| Day21 | Negative/6782 | Positive | - | + | - | - | |
| Day28 | Negative/24678 | Positive | + | + | ++ | - | |
| Day35 | Positive/8892 | Negative | - | + | - | - | |
| Day45 | Positive/Negative | Positive | + | + | - | - | |
| Day52 | Positive/7374 | Negative | - | + | - | - | |
| Day59 | Positive/22963 | Positive | + | + | ++ | - | |
| HepG2 Control | - | - | - | + | + | - | |
+: Equal to the expression level in the HepG2; ++: twofold increase in the expression level; +++ threefold increase in the expression level.
Figure 3Data on gene amplification. Ethidium bromide-stained 2% agarose gel (A) for Bcl2 gene amplification. Lanes 1 and 2 showed negative RT-PCR control; lane 3 showed positive amplification of CH case; lane 4 showed negative amplification of CH case; lane 5 showed positive amplification of HCC case; lane 6 showed negative amplification of HCC case; lane 7 showed positive amplification of HepG2 without HCV infection; lane 8 showed positive amplification of HepG2 with HCV infection. (B) For Bcl-Xl gene amplification. Lane 1 showed HepG2-positive amplification with HCV infection at day 28; lane 2 HepG2-negative amplification without HCV infection; lane 3 and 4 showed positive amplification of CH case; lane 5 showed positive amplification of HCC case; lane 6 & 7 showed negative RT-PCR control. (C) For Bak gene amplification. lane 1 HepG2-positive amplification with HCV infection at days 59; lane 2 HepG2-negative amplification without HCV infection lane 3 showed HepG2-negative amplification with HCV infection at days 35; lane 4 showed positive amplification of CH case; lane 5 showed positive amplification of HCC case of CH; lane 6 negative RT-PCR control. (D) for Fas gene amplification, first lane: MW, lanes 1 and 2: negative RT-PCR control, lane 3 showed HepG2-positive amplification without HCV infection, lane 4 HepG2- showed negative amplification with HCV infection at day 21, lane 5 showed negative case of HCC, lanes 6 and 7 showed positive amplification of CH and lane 8 showed positive amplification of HCC case. (E) for FasL gene amplification, lane 1: negative RT-PCR control; lanes 2 and 3 showed HepG2-positive amplification with HCV infection at days 28 and 35 respectively; lane 4 showed HepG2-negative amplification without HCV infection; lane 5 showed negative case of CH; lanes 6 and 7 showed positive amplification of CH, lanes 8 and 9 showed positive amplification of HCC case. (F) Amplification plot of RT-PCR for housekeeping gene using Taqman probe.
Figure 4Changes in caspases expression levels .
Figure 5The expression level of the apoptotic genes in the different studied groups. NB: CH = Chronic hepatitis, HCC = Hepatocelullar carcinoma, NAT = Normal distant to tumor.
Figure 6Cases of chronic hepatitis (CH) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Data from cases of CH showing (A) high membranous expression of FasL, (B) moderate cytoplasmic expression of FAS and (C) moderate cytoplasmic expression of Bcl-2. Cases of HCC showing (D) High membranous expression of FasL, (E) Marked expression of FAS, (F) high expression of Bcl-2, and (G) Marked expression of Bcl2 in tumor tissues with loss of expression in adjacent non neoplastic region. Scale bar = 100 μm (A, C, D, G) and 200 μm (B, E, F).
Correlation between gene expression and clinicopathological features in hepatocellular carcinoma cases.
| Variable | Bak | Fas | FasL | Bcl-2 | Bcl-xL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57 ± 10.2 | |||||
| ≤ 55: 16 (46) | 12 (75) | 7 (44) | 3 (19) | 10 (63) | 5 (31) |
| > 55: 19 (54) | 12 (63) | 12 (63) # | 5 (26) | 18 (95) # | 4 (21) |
| M: 22 (63) | 17 (77) # | 12 (55) | 5 (23) | 19 (86) # | 4 (18) |
| F: 13 (37) | 7 (54) | 7 (54) | 3 (23) | 9 (69) | 5 (38) # |
| ≤ 8: (22) | 14 (64) | 10 (45) | 4 (18) | 17 (77) | 5 (23) |
| > 8: (13) | 10 (77) | 9 (69) | 5 (38) | 9 (69) | 4 (31) |
| II: 22 (63) | 16 (73) # | 10 (45) | 4 (18) | 17 (77) | 6 (27) |
| III: 13 (37) | 8 (61) | 9 (69) # | 4 (31) | 11 (84) # | 3(23) |
| Positive: (18) | 15 (83) # | 12 (67) | 6 (33) | 15 (83) | 6 (33) |
| Negative: (17) | 9 (53) | 7 (41) | 2 (12) | 13 (76) | 3 (18) |
| Present: 15 (43) | 8 (53) | 10 (67) # | 4 (27) | 12 (80%) | 3 (20) |
| Absent: 20 (57) | 16(80) # | 9 (45) | 4 (20) | 16 (80%) | 6 (30) |
# significantly difference (p < 0.005)
Correlation between gene expression and clinicopathological features in CH patients
| Variable | Bak | Fas | FasL | Bcl-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44 ± 9.8 | ||||
| ≤ 47: 18 (53) | 8 (44) | 13 (72) # | 8 (44) | 9 (50) |
| > 47: 16 (47) | 8 (50) | 6 (38) | 8 (50) | 11 (69) |
| M: 31 (91) | 13 (41) | 17 (55) | 15 (48) | 18 (58) |
| F: 3 (8) | 3 (100) # | 2 (67) # | 1 (33) | 2 (66) |
| Absent: (10) | 3 (30) | 3 (30) | 2 (20) | 4 (40) |
| Minimal: (14) | 7 (50) | 9 (64) | 4 (29) | 10 (71) |
| Moderate: (7) | 4 (57) | 5 (71) | 7 (100) | 5 (71) |
| Marked: (3) | 2 (67) | 2 (67) | 3 (100) | 1 (33) |
| Absent: (26) | 12 (46) | 13 (50) | 9 (35) | 16 (62) |
| Minimal: (8) | 4 (50) | 6 (75) | 7 (88) # | 4 (50) |
| Absent: (10) | 4 (40) | 5 (50) | 0 (0) | 3 (30) |
| Minimal: (15) | 8 (53) | 9 (60) | 8 (53) | 11 (73) |
| Moderate: (9) | 4 (44) | 5 (56) | 8 (89) | 6 (67) |
| Present:12 (35) | 6 (50) | 6 (50) | 6(50) | 9 (75) # |
| Absent: 22 (65) | 10 (45%) | 13 (59) | 10(45) | 11 (50) |
| I &II: (26) | 11 (42) | 12 (46) | 9 (35) | 15 (58) |
| III&IV: (8) | 5 (63) | 7 (88) # | 7 (88) # | 5 (63) |
| I &II: (25) | 12 (48) | 13 (52) | 8 (32) | 16 (64) |
| III &IV: (9) | 4 (44) | 6 (67) | 8 (89) # | 4 (44) |
Bcl-xL was not expressed in any of the studied CH cases. # significantly difference (p < 0.005).