PURPOSE: Mesothelin expression is found in normal mesothelium, and cancerous mesothelin has been recently reported in ovarian and pancreas cancer. The clinicopathological implications of mesothelin expression have been discussed with respect to antitumor immunological mechanisms. However, there is no information on mesothelin expression in gastric cancer. The purpose of the current study is to identify the clinical significance of mesothelin in gastric cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A total of 212 gastric cancer patients who received R0 gastrectomy at Kagoshima University Hospital were enrolled in this study. Mesothelin was detected immunohistochemically and visualized by ABC method. Intensity of cancerous mesothelin was divided into two categories (0-50%: negative group and 51-100%: positive group). RESULTS: Mesothelin expression was detected in the cellular membrane. In accordance with the previous evaluation, patients were divided into two groups [mesothelin-positive group: 124 (59%) and mesothelin-negative group: 88 (41%)]. The mesothelin-positive group had significantly more nodal involvement and significantly deeper tumor invasion than the mesothelin-negative group (P < 0.05). However, by analysis confined to the 117 advanced gastric cancer patients, the 5-year survival rate of the mesothelin-positive group was 55%, which was significantly better than that of the mesothelin-negative group. Multivariate analysis revealed that mesothelin expression is one of the independent prognostic factors of gastric cancer. CONCLUSION: Cancerous mesothelin expression in gastric cancer may be a useful tool to predict patient survival.
PURPOSE:Mesothelin expression is found in normal mesothelium, and cancerousmesothelin has been recently reported in ovarian and pancreas cancer. The clinicopathological implications of mesothelin expression have been discussed with respect to antitumor immunological mechanisms. However, there is no information on mesothelin expression in gastric cancer. The purpose of the current study is to identify the clinical significance of mesothelin in gastric cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A total of 212 gastric cancerpatients who received R0 gastrectomy at Kagoshima University Hospital were enrolled in this study. Mesothelin was detected immunohistochemically and visualized by ABC method. Intensity of cancerousmesothelin was divided into two categories (0-50%: negative group and 51-100%: positive group). RESULTS:Mesothelin expression was detected in the cellular membrane. In accordance with the previous evaluation, patients were divided into two groups [mesothelin-positive group: 124 (59%) and mesothelin-negative group: 88 (41%)]. The mesothelin-positive group had significantly more nodal involvement and significantly deeper tumor invasion than the mesothelin-negative group (P < 0.05). However, by analysis confined to the 117 advanced gastric cancerpatients, the 5-year survival rate of the mesothelin-positive group was 55%, which was significantly better than that of the mesothelin-negative group. Multivariate analysis revealed that mesothelin expression is one of the independent prognostic factors of gastric cancer. CONCLUSION:Cancerousmesothelin expression in gastric cancer may be a useful tool to predict patient survival.
Authors: Peter B Illei; Christine Alewine; Marianna Zahurak; Morgan L Cowan; Elizabeth Montgomery; Raffit Hassan; Laiman Xiang; Ira Pastan; Ronan J Kelly Journal: Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol Date: 2016-04
Authors: Su-Jin Shin; Sejung Park; Min Hwan Kim; Chung Mo Nam; Hyunki Kim; Yoon Young Choi; Min Kyu Jung; Hye Jin Choi; Sun Young Rha; Hyun Cheol Chung Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-04-23
Authors: Napa Parinyanitikul; George R Blumenschein; Yun Wu; Xiudong Lei; Mariana Chavez-Macgregor; Melody Smart; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2013-06-27 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Kun Wang; Vidya Bodempudi; Zhengian Liu; Emma Borrego-Diaz; Farnaz Yamoutpoor; Anna Meyer; Richard A Woo; Weihong Pan; Arkadiusz Z Dudek; Mojtaba S Olyaee; Tuba Esfandyari; Faris Farassati Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-04-02 Impact factor: 3.240