| Literature DB >> 21779309 |
Altay O Altuntas, Benjamin Dagge, Terence Y P Chin, Joseph E A Palamara, Norman Eizenberg, Rory Wolfe, H Kerr Graham.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lengthening of soft-tissue contractures is frequently required in children with a wide variety of congenital and acquired deformities. However, little is known about the biomechanics of surgical procedures which are commonly used in contracture surgery, or if variations in technique may have a bearing on surgical outcomes. We investigated the hypothesis that the site of intramuscular tenotomy (IMT) within the muscle-tendon-unit (MTU) of the tibialis posterior (TP) would affect the lengthening characteristics.Entities:
Keywords: Contracture; Intramuscular tenotomy; Lengthening; Muscle–tendon-unit; Tibialis posterior
Year: 2011 PMID: 21779309 PMCID: PMC3100458 DOI: 10.1007/s11832-011-0335-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Child Orthop ISSN: 1863-2521 Impact factor: 1.548
Fig. 1Equinovarus right foot and contracted TP-MTU with IMT, before stretching. Tibialis posterior tendon fibres divided (with arrows). Surgical approach to TP-MTU from medial side, posterior to tibia. Posterior view, medial view
Fig. 2Right leg with tibialis posterior post Majestro, Ruda & Frost lengthening. Posterior view, medial view
Fig. 3Experimental set-up: TP-MTU with high IMT undergoing tensile testing using Instron® Model 5544 testing machine
Fig. 4Schematic representation of TP-MTU high and low IMT tensile testing
Results for tibialis posterior intramuscular tenotomy tensile testing
| Cadaver | Side | Tenotomy | Load (N) at failure | Displacement (mm) at failure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Left | None (control) | 157.1 | 10.0 |
| 1 | Right | Low | 9.2 | 6.3 |
| 2 | Left | High | 38.8 | 28.4 |
| 2 | Right | Low | 8.9 | 15.5 |
| 3 | Left | Low | 3.2 | 6.0 |
| 3 | Right | High | 11.1 | 15.3 |
| 4 | Left | Low | 4.4 | 6.8 |
| 4 | Right | High | 17.7 | 39.4 |
| 5 | Left | Low | 3.3 | 7.6 |
| 5 | Right | High | 10.3 | 16.3 |
| 6 | Left | Low | 4.3 | 7.6 |
| 6 | Right | High | 14.2 | 14.4 |
| 7 | Left | High | 35.8 | 35.4 |
| 7 | Right | Low | 13.8 | 16.0 |
| 8 | Left | High | 19.8 | 29.0 |
| 8 | Right | Low | 13.5 | 26.1 |
| 9 | Left | High | 35.5 | 34.4 |
| 9 | Right | Low | 28.3 | 35.4 |
| 10 | Left | Low | 7.0 | 20.3 |
| 10 | Right | High | 20.6 | 30.6 |
Fig. 5Results for high and low tibialis posterior intramuscular tenotomy from cadaver 8. (In box) Left TP High IMT, Right TP Low IMT (with corresponding lines), Point of load at failure for the paired low IMT (with dashed lines), Difference in lengthening for the same applied load (with arrows), (X-axis note units 0–25 N) Load (Newtons), (Y-axis, note units 0–35 mm) Displacement (elongation in millimetres), (Note also graph starts at “preloaded” 1 Newton on the X-axis)