Literature DB >> 21778748

Response to growth hormone treatment in isolated growth hormone deficiency versus multiple pituitary hormone deficiency.

F Darendeliler1, A Lindberg, P Wilton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Growth hormone (GH) therapy successfully increases height prognosis in children with GH deficiency (GHD); however, adult height data are still limited. AIM: This study investigated near-adult height (NAH) in patients with idiopathic GHD (i.e. those with a GH peak <10 μg/l with no organic pathology) divided into two groups: isolated GHD and multiple pituitary hormone deficiency (MPHD).
METHODS: All patients were registered in the Pfizer International Growth Study Database (KIGS). Median (10th to 90th percentile) values are given and measurements were expressed as standard deviation scores (SDS). Parental-adjusted height was determined.
RESULTS: GH therapy was started at a median age of 9.2 (range 4.9-12) years in patients with isolated GHD (n = 1,619, 60% males) and at 7.7 (range 2.8-12.2) years in those with MPHD (n = 554, 65% males; p < 0.001) at a median dose of 0.20 mg/kg/week. Height SDS at onset of therapy was -3.1 (range -4.5 to -2.1) and -3.8 (range -5.7 to -2.3), respectively (p < 0.001). The maximum GH peak and insulin-like growth factor I SDS were significantly (p < 0.05) lower in patients with MPHD than in those with isolated GHD. Both groups showed a significant (p < 0.05) increase in height SDS at 1 year that continued until the onset of puberty. Parental-adjusted height at the start of puberty was -0.1 (range -1.6 to 1.1) in patients with isolated GHD and -0.4 (range -1.9 to 1.2) in those with MPHD. Parental-adjusted NAH SDS in patients with isolated GHD was 0.0 (range -1.5 to 1.2) and slightly, but significantly, higher than NAH (-0.3, range -2.1 to 1.2; p < 0.001) in patients with MPHD. In patients with isolated GHD, total change in height SDS while receiving GH therapy was 1.6 (range 0.5-3.2), and the change in height SDS at puberty was 0.1 (range -0.7 to 1). The respective values were 2.6 (range 0.9-4.6) and 0.2 (range -1 to 1.3) in patients with MPHD. Parental-adjusted NAH was slightly lower in girls than in boys with isolated GHD, but no gender difference was observed in patients with MPHD. Multivariate analysis in patients with GHD and MPHD showed that higher birth weight, taller parents, greater height at onset, first-year responsiveness, and predicted height velocity were the most important predictors of NAH.
CONCLUSIONS: 89% of patients with isolated GHD and 81% of those with MPHD reached an NAH within their genetic potential while receiving GH therapy. Most of the height gain occurred during prepubertal years.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21778748     DOI: 10.1159/000329161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Horm Res Paediatr        ISSN: 1663-2818            Impact factor:   2.852


  15 in total

1.  Isolated childhood growth hormone deficiency: a 30-year experience on final height and a new prediction model.

Authors:  Antonella Lonero; Massimo Giotta; Giulia Guerrini; Valeria Calcaterra; Elena Galazzi; Lorenzo Iughetti; Alessandra Cassio; Gabriela Malgorzata Wasniewska; Chiara Mameli; Gianluca Tornese; Mariacarolina Salerno; Valentino Cherubini; Manuela Caruso Nicoletti; Maria Elisabeth Street; Anna Grandone; Claudio Giacomozzi; Maria Felicia Faienza; Chiara Guzzetti; Simonetta Bellone; Maria Parpagnoli; Gianluca Musolino; Maria Cristina Maggio; Mauro Bozzola; Paolo Trerotoli; Maurizio Delvecchio
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 5.467

2.  EVALUATION OF FIRST YEAR RESPONSE TO TREATMENT IN CASES WITH GROWTH HORMONE DEFICIENCY.

Authors:  Y Kör; M Keskin
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Buchar)       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.877

3.  Increased height standard deviation scores in response to growth hormone therapy to near-adult height in older children with delayed skeletal maturation: results from the ANSWER Program.

Authors:  Judith L Ross; Peter A Lee; Robert Gut; John Germak
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Endocrinol       Date:  2015-01-15

Review 4.  Possible effects of an early diagnosis and treatment in patients with growth hormone deficiency: the state of art.

Authors:  Stefano Stagi; Perla Scalini; Giovanni Farello; Alberto Verrotti
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 2.638

5.  Real-life GH dosing patterns in children with GHD, TS or born SGA: a report from the NordiNet® International Outcome Study.

Authors:  Oliver Blankenstein; Marta Snajderova; Jo Blair; Effie Pournara; Birgitte Tønnes Pedersen; Isabelle Oliver Petit
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 6.664

6.  Early growth hormone treatment start in childhood growth hormone deficiency improves near adult height: analysis from NordiNet® International Outcome Study.

Authors:  Michel Polak; Jo Blair; Primoz Kotnik; Effie Pournara; Birgitte Tønnes Pedersen; Tilman R Rohrer
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 6.664

Review 7.  The Stromal Niche for Epithelial Stem Cells: A Template for Regeneration and a Brake on Malignancy.

Authors:  Kelsey J Roberts; Aaron M Kershner; Philip A Beachy
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 31.743

8.  Recombinant growth hormone therapy in children with short stature in Kuwait: a cross-sectional study of use and treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Dalia Al-Abdulrazzaq; Abdullah Al-Taiar; Kholoud Hassan; Iman Al-Basari
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 2.763

9.  Mutations Within the Transcription Factor PROP1 in a Cohort of Turkish Patients with Combined Pituitary Hormone Deficiency

Authors:  Fatma Derya Bulut; Semine Özdemir Dilek; Damla Kotan; Eda Mengen; Fatih Gürbüz; Bilgin Yüksel
Journal:  J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol       Date:  2020-01-17

10.  Response to growth hormone in patients with RNPC3 mutations.

Authors:  Gabriel Á Martos-Moreno; Lourdes Travieso-Suárez; Jesús Pozo-Román; María T Muñoz-Calvo; Julie A Chowen; Mikko J Frilander; Luis A Pérez-Jurado; Federico G Hawkins; Jesús Argente
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 12.137

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.