Literature DB >> 21778605

Effect of different surface treatments on the repair strength of a nanofilled resin-based composite.

Naho Hamano1, Yu-Chih Chiang, Indra Nyamaa, Hiroaki Yamaguchi, Satoshi Ino, Reinhard Hickel, Karl-Heinz Kunzelmann.   

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to re-evaluate the effects of surface treatment on the bond strength of repaired methacrylate-based dental composite materials including nanofillers (Ceram X, Dentsply). The microtensile bond strengths were measured before or after thermo-mechanical fatigue simulation. The treatments were as follows: (1)No treatment (negative control), (2)Bonding agent, (3) Acetone, (4)Acetone+Bonding agent, (5)Silane, (6)Silane+Bonding agent. In the digitized SEM image of the polished aged specimens without any surface treatment, the percentage of the visible fillers relative to the whole image was calculated. Before and after fatigue, no significant differences could be observed among the different pretreatment groups. Fatigue increased the microtensile strength values of Acetone and Silane groups. The digitized SEM image reveals that 11.5% of the exposed surface could be identified as uncovered filler surface. None of surface treatments (acetone, silane and bonding agent) contributed to increase the tensile strength of repaired composite samples including nanofillers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21778605     DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2010-202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater J        ISSN: 0287-4547            Impact factor:   2.102


  8 in total

1.  Restorative material and other tooth-specific variables associated with the decision to repair or replace defective restorations: findings from The Dental PBRN.

Authors:  Valeria V Gordan; Joseph L Riley; Donald C Worley; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Repair bond strength of nanohybrid composite resins with a universal adhesive.

Authors:  Pinar Altinci; Murat Mutluay; Arzu Tezvergil-Mutluay
Journal:  Acta Biomater Odontol Scand       Date:  2017-12-12

3.  Effect of curing and silanizing on composite repair bond strength using an improved micro-tensile test method.

Authors:  Sigfus Thor Eliasson; Jon E Dahl
Journal:  Acta Biomater Odontol Scand       Date:  2017-03-19

4.  Repair bond strength of bulk fill composites after different adhesion protocols.

Authors:  Thiago-Clístines de Medeiros; Mariana-Rodrigues de Lima; Stephany-Cimarosti-Figueiredo Bessa; Diana-Ferreira-Gadelha de Araújo; Marília-Regalado Galvão
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-11-01

5.  The effect of surface treatments and bonding regimens on microtensile bond strengths of repaired composite: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Gouri Smita Acharya; Mk Manjunath
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2012-10

6.  The reparability of contemporary composite resins.

Authors:  Maria Spyrou; Eugenia Koliniotou-Koumpia; Pantelis Kouros; Elisabeth Koulaouzidou; Pavlos Dionysopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2014-07

7.  Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of nanofilled composite repairs.

Authors:  Ghazaleh Ahmadizenouz; Behnaz Esmaeili; Arnica Taghvaei; Zahra Jamali; Toloo Jafari; Farshid Amiri Daneshvar; Soraya Khafri
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2016-03-16

8.  Influence of material and surface treatment on composite repair shear bond strength.

Authors:  Pantelis Kouros; Eugenia Koliniotou-Koumpia; Maria Spyrou; Elisabeth Koulaouzidou
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2018 May-Jun
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.