Literature DB >> 21778500

Framing peak petroleum as a public health problem: audience research and participatory engagement in the United States.

Matthew C Nisbet1, Edward Maibach, Anthony Leiserowitz.   

Abstract

Between December 2009 and January 2010, we conducted a nationally representative telephone survey of US adults (n = 1001; completion rate = 52.9%) to explore perceptions of risks associated with peak petroleum. We asked respondents to assess the likelihood that oil prices would triple over the next 5 years and then to estimate the economic and health consequences of that event. Nearly half (48%) indicated that oil prices were likely to triple, causing harm to human health; an additional 16% said dramatic price increases were unlikely but would harm health if they did occur. A large minority (44%) said sharp increases in oil prices would be "very harmful" to health. Respondents who self-identified as very conservative and those who were strongly dismissive of climate change were the respondents most likely to perceive very harmful health consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21778500      PMCID: PMC3154229          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  8 in total

1.  Strategies for academic and clinician engagement in community-participatory partnered research.

Authors:  Loretta Jones; Kenneth Wells
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Energy and public health: the challenge of peak petroleum.

Authors:  Howard Frumkin; Jeremy Hess; Stephen Vindigni
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Peak oil: will it be public health's greatest challenge?

Authors:  P Hanlon; G McCartney
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 2.427

4.  Peak petroleum and public health.

Authors:  Howard Frumkin; Jeremy Hess; Stephen Vindigni
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions.

Authors:  Matthew C Nisbet; Dietram A Scheufele
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 3.844

6.  Public health and medicine in an age of energy scarcity: the case of petroleum.

Authors:  Brian S Schwartz; Cindy L Parker; Jeremy Hess; Howard Frumkin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Reframing climate change as a public health issue: an exploratory study of public reactions.

Authors:  Edward W Maibach; Matthew Nisbet; Paula Baldwin; Karen Akerlof; Guoqing Diao
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Identifying like-minded audiences for global warming public engagement campaigns: an audience segmentation analysis and tool development.

Authors:  Edward W Maibach; Anthony Leiserowitz; Connie Roser-Renouf; C K Mertz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Petroleum scarcity and public health: considerations for local health departments.

Authors:  Daniel J Barnett; Cindy L Parker; Virginia A Caine; Mary McKee; Lillian M Shirley; Jonathan M Links
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Public health and medicine in an age of energy scarcity: the case of petroleum.

Authors:  Brian S Schwartz; Cindy L Parker; Jeremy Hess; Howard Frumkin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Setting the agenda for a healthy retail environment: content analysis of US newspaper coverage of tobacco control policies affecting the point of sale, 2007-2014.

Authors:  Allison E Myers; Brian G Southwell; Kurt M Ribisl; Sarah Moreland-Russell; Leslie A Lytle
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  An audience research study to disseminate evidence about comprehensive state mental health parity legislation to US State policymakers: protocol.

Authors:  Jonathan Purtle; Félice Lê-Scherban; Paul Shattuck; Enola K Proctor; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Audience segmentation to disseminate behavioral health evidence to legislators: an empirical clustering analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan Purtle; Félice Lê-Scherban; Xi Wang; Paul T Shattuck; Enola K Proctor; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 7.327

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.