Why should trees have natural root grafts?

Natural root grafts occur in many tree species, but this widespread phenomenon has received only little attention. For many years, physiological aspects such as transfer of organic materials, water and minerals were considered their major significance. Better anchorage in flooded areas or in windy habitats was also proposed to select for this character. I propose that root grafts provide several additional types of benefit to intact grafted trees, to neighbors of trees that have lost their crowns, and sometimes even to the ones that have lost their crowns. These include: being a mate (female, male or both) for one's own gametes; taking a chance that the grafted neighbor will lose its crown, leaving it with its neighbor's grafted root system; for trees that reproduce vegetatively, there is a good chance that the neighbor is a ramet of the same genet, and root grafting thus supports the same genotype, and since most seeds are dispersed near the parent tree there is a good chance that the grafted neighbor is genetically close. For a grafted root system that has lost its original crown, the genotype continues to live and in certain taxa it still has a chance to resume canopy growth and reproduction. While root grafts may enable acquisition of beneficial fungi or microorganisms from the grafted neighbor, there is a risk of pathogen transmission. Since roots produce various toxins that defend the canopy, root grafts with other genotypes that provide additional types of defensive molecule may increase the tree's resistance to various herbivores and pathogens. In spite of the potential benefits, pathogen transmission and increased neighbor competition may select against the characteristic of root grafting.