Rebecca C Thurston1, Nanette Santoro, Karen A Matthews. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3811 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA. thurstonrc@upmc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The nature of the relationship between adiposity and hot flashes has been debated, but it has not been examined using physiological measures of hot flashes. We examined associations between body size/composition and physiologically assessed hot flashes among women with hot flashes. METHODS: A subcohort of women in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (n = 52; 25 African-American and 27 non-Hispanic Caucasian; ages, 54 to 63 yr) who reported hot flashes, had their uterus and ovaries, and were not taking medications impacting hot flashes were recruited in 2008-2009. Women completed anthropometric measures [bioimpedance analysis of total percentage of body fat, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference], a blood draw (estradiol, SHBG, FSH, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate), and 4 d of ambulatory sternal skin conductance monitoring with diary (physiological and reported hot flashes, respectively). Associations between anthropometrics and hot flashes were estimated with generalized estimating equations with covariates age, race, and anxiety. RESULTS: Higher BMI (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-0.99; P < 0.05) and waist circumference (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-0.99; P < 0.01) were associated with fewer physiological hot flashes. Interactions by age (P < 0.05) indicated that inverse associations of body fat, BMI, and waist circumference with hot flashes were most apparent among the oldest women in the sample. Estradiol and SHBG reduced but did not eliminate age-related variations in relations between body size/composition and hot flashes. CONCLUSION: Higher adiposity was associated with fewer physiological hot flashes among older women with hot flashes. A modifying role of age must be considered in understanding the role of adiposity in hot flashes.
BACKGROUND: The nature of the relationship between adiposity and hot flashes has been debated, but it has not been examined using physiological measures of hot flashes. We examined associations between body size/composition and physiologically assessed hot flashes among women with hot flashes. METHODS: A subcohort of women in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (n = 52; 25 African-American and 27 non-Hispanic Caucasian; ages, 54 to 63 yr) who reported hot flashes, had their uterus and ovaries, and were not taking medications impacting hot flashes were recruited in 2008-2009. Women completed anthropometric measures [bioimpedance analysis of total percentage of body fat, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference], a blood draw (estradiol, SHBG, FSH, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate), and 4 d of ambulatory sternal skin conductance monitoring with diary (physiological and reported hot flashes, respectively). Associations between anthropometrics and hot flashes were estimated with generalized estimating equations with covariates age, race, and anxiety. RESULTS: Higher BMI (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-0.99; P < 0.05) and waist circumference (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-0.99; P < 0.01) were associated with fewer physiological hot flashes. Interactions by age (P < 0.05) indicated that inverse associations of body fat, BMI, and waist circumference with hot flashes were most apparent among the oldest women in the sample. Estradiol and SHBG reduced but did not eliminate age-related variations in relations between body size/composition and hot flashes. CONCLUSION: Higher adiposity was associated with fewer physiological hot flashes among older women with hot flashes. A modifying role of age must be considered in understanding the role of adiposity in hot flashes.
Authors: W C Chumlea; S S Guo; R J Kuczmarski; K M Flegal; C L Johnson; S B Heymsfield; H C Lukaski; K Friedl; V S Hubbard Journal: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord Date: 2002-12
Authors: Barry G England; George H Parsons; Russell M Possley; Daniel S McConnell; A Rees Midgley Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: John F Randolph; MaryFran Sowers; Ellen B Gold; Beth A Mohr; Judith Luborsky; Nanette Santoro; Daniel S McConnell; Joel S Finkelstein; Stanley G Korenman; Karen A Matthews; Barbara Sternfeld; Bill L Lasley Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Maura K Whiteman; Catherine A Staropoli; Patricia W Langenberg; Robert J McCarter; Kristen H Kjerulff; Jodi A Flaws Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Nanette Santoro; Bill Lasley; Dan McConnell; Jenifer Allsworth; Sybil Crawford; Ellen B Gold; Joel S Finkelstein; Gail A Greendale; Jenny Kelsey; Stan Korenman; Judith L Luborsky; Karen Matthews; Rees Midgley; Lynda Powell; Janice Sabatine; Miriam Schocken; Mary Fran Sowers; Gerson Weiss Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Lisa Gallicchio; Susan R Miller; Judith Kiefer; Teresa Greene; Howard A Zacur; Jodi A Flaws Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Rebecca C Thurston; James F Luther; Stephen R Wisniewski; Heather Eng; Katherine L Wisner Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2013-09-12 Impact factor: 7.329