HIV-1 integrase (IN) is a validated therapeutic target for antiviral drug design. However, the emergence of viral strains resistant to clinically studied IN inhibitors demands the discovery of novel inhibitors that are structurally as well mechanistically different. Herein, we describe the design and discovery of novel IN inhibitors targeting the catalytic domain as well as its interaction with LEDGF/p75, which is essential for the HIV-1 integration as an IN cofactor. By merging the pharmacophores of salicylate and catechol, the 2,3-dihydroxybenzamide (5a) was identified as a new scaffold to inhibit the strand transfer reaction efficiently. Further structural modifications on the 2,3-dihydroxybenzamide scaffold revealed that the heteroaromatic functionality attached on the carboxamide portion and the piperidin-1-ylsulfonyl substituted at the phenyl ring are beneficial for the activity, resulting in a low micromolar IN inhibitor (5p, IC(50)=5 μM) with more than 40-fold selectivity for the strand transfer over the 3'-processing reaction. More significantly, this active scaffold remarkably inhibited the interaction between IN and LEDGF/p75 cofactor. The prototype example, N-(cyclohexylmethyl)-2,3-dihydroxy-5-(piperidin-1-ylsulfonyl) benzamide (5u) inhibited the IN-LEDGF/p75 interaction with an IC(50) value of 8 μM. Using molecular modeling, the mechanism of action was hypothesized to involve the chelation of the divalent metal ions inside the IN active site. Furthermore, the inhibitor of IN-LEDGF/p75 interaction was properly bound to the LEDGF/p75 binding site on IN. This work provides a new and efficient approach to evolve novel HIV-1 IN inhibitors from rational integration and optimization of previously reported inhibitors.
HIV-1 integrase (IN) is a validated theran class="Chemical">peutic target for antiviral drug design. However, the emergence of viral strains resistant to clinically studied IN inhibitors demands the discovery of novel inhibitors that are structurally as well mechanistically different. Herein, we describe the design and discovery of novel IN inhibitors targeting the catalytic domain as well as its interaction with LEDGF/p75, which is essential for the HIV-1 integration as an IN cofactor. By merging the pharmacophores of salicylate and catechol, the 2,3-dihydroxybenzamide (5a) was identified as a new scaffold to inhibit the strand transfer reaction efficiently. Further structural modifications on the 2,3-dihydroxybenzamide scaffold revealed that the heteroaromatic functionality attached on the carboxamide portion and the piperidin-1-ylsulfonyl substituted at the phenyl ring are beneficial for the activity, resulting in a low micromolar IN inhibitor (5p, IC(50)=5 μM) with more than 40-fold selectivity for the strand transfer over the 3'-processing reaction. More significantly, this active scaffold remarkably inhibited the interaction between IN and LEDGF/p75 cofactor. The prototype example, N-(cyclohexylmethyl)-2,3-dihydroxy-5-(piperidin-1-ylsulfonyl) benzamide (5u) inhibited the IN-LEDGF/p75 interaction with an IC(50) value of 8 μM. Using molecular modeling, the mechanism of action was hypothesized to involve the chelation of the divalent metal ions inside the IN active site. Furthermore, the inhibitor of IN-LEDGF/p75 interaction was properly bound to the LEDGF/p75 binding site on IN. This work provides a new and efficient approach to evolve novel HIV-1 IN inhibitors from rational integration and optimization of previously reported inhibitors.
Authors: Thomas A Halgren; Robert B Murphy; Richard A Friesner; Hege S Beard; Leah L Frye; W Thomas Pollard; Jay L Banks Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2004-03-25 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2004-03-25 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Frauke Christ; Arnout Voet; Arnaud Marchand; Stefan Nicolet; Belete A Desimmie; Damien Marchand; Dorothée Bardiot; Nam Joo Van der Veken; Barbara Van Remoortel; Sergei V Strelkov; Marc De Maeyer; Patrick Chaltin; Zeger Debyser Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2010-05-16 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: Daniel M Himmel; Stefan G Sarafianos; Sanjeewa Dharmasena; Mohammed M Hossain; Kessler McCoy-Simandle; Tatiana Ilina; Arthur D Clark; Jennifer L Knight; John G Julias; Patrick K Clark; Karsten Krogh-Jespersen; Ronald M Levy; Stephen H Hughes; Michael A Parniak; Eddy Arnold Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2006-12-20 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: Peter Cherepanov; Andre L B Ambrosio; Shaila Rahman; Tom Ellenberger; Alan Engelman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-10-31 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Angela Ciuffi; Manuel Llano; Eric Poeschla; Christian Hoffmann; Jeremy Leipzig; Paul Shinn; Joseph R Ecker; Frederic Bushman Journal: Nat Med Date: 2005-11-27 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: N Neamati; H Hong; J M Owen; S Sunder; H E Winslow; J L Christensen; H Zhao; T R Burke; G W Milne; Y Pommier Journal: J Med Chem Date: 1998-08-13 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Xue Zhi Zhao; Kasthuraiah Maddali; Steven J Smith; Mathieu Métifiot; Barry C Johnson; Christophe Marchand; Stephen H Hughes; Yves Pommier; Terrence R Burke Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2012-10-27 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: D A Stoyanovsky; L J Sparvero; A A Amoscato; R R He; S Watkins; B R Pitt; H Bayir; V E Kagan Journal: Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom Date: 2014-03-15 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Thomas S Peat; David I Rhodes; Nick Vandegraaff; Giang Le; Jessica A Smith; Lisa J Clark; Eric D Jones; Jonathan A V Coates; Neeranat Thienthong; Janet Newman; Olan Dolezal; Roger Mulder; John H Ryan; G Paul Savage; Craig L Francis; John J Deadman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 3.240