OBJECTIVE: To present our institutional experience in the management of pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects with urethral pull-through operation. METHODS: Seventy-six patients (average age 34.5 years) with posterior urethral strictures caused by pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects underwent urethral pull-through operation at our department from July 1995 to September 2009. The estimated urethral stricture length was 2.0-3.5 cm (mean 2.5). Of these patients, 31 (41%) had undergone failed urethroplasty or urethrotomy after the initial management, and 5 (7%) had urethrorectal fistula. Urethral pull-through operation was performed 4-7 months (mean 4.9) after initial treatment or failed urethral reconstruction. The clinical outcome was considered a failure when any postoperative intervention was needed. RESULTS: Follow-up was 14-74 months (mean 42.5). The overall success rate was 89% (68/76). All treatment failures occurred within the first 6 months postoperatively. Failed repairs were successfully managed with internal urethrotomy in 1 patient, by urethral dilation in 6, and by another urethroplasty in 1. All patients were urinary-continent postoperatively. Of the potent patients, 2 (5%) became impotent after urethroplasty. There was no chordee, penile shortening, or urethral fistula recurrence. CONCLUSION: Urethral pull-through operation might be a less demanding and less time-consuming procedure. It does not increase the rate of impotence or incontinence and, with a high success rate, might serve as an alternative method for the management of pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects.
OBJECTIVE: To present our institutional experience in the management of pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects with urethral pull-through operation. METHODS: Seventy-six patients (average age 34.5 years) with posterior urethral strictures caused by pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects underwent urethral pull-through operation at our department from July 1995 to September 2009. The estimated urethral stricture length was 2.0-3.5 cm (mean 2.5). Of these patients, 31 (41%) had undergone failed urethroplasty or urethrotomy after the initial management, and 5 (7%) had urethrorectal fistula. Urethral pull-through operation was performed 4-7 months (mean 4.9) after initial treatment or failed urethral reconstruction. The clinical outcome was considered a failure when any postoperative intervention was needed. RESULTS: Follow-up was 14-74 months (mean 42.5). The overall success rate was 89% (68/76). All treatment failures occurred within the first 6 months postoperatively. Failed repairs were successfully managed with internal urethrotomy in 1 patient, by urethral dilation in 6, and by another urethroplasty in 1. All patients were urinary-continent postoperatively. Of the potent patients, 2 (5%) became impotent after urethroplasty. There was no chordee, penile shortening, or urethral fistula recurrence. CONCLUSION: Urethral pull-through operation might be a less demanding and less time-consuming procedure. It does not increase the rate of impotence or incontinence and, with a high success rate, might serve as an alternative method for the management of pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects.