Literature DB >> 21777684

In vitro mutagen binding and antimutagenic activity of human Lactobacillus rhamnosus 231.

Padma Ambalam1, J M Dave, Baboo M Nair, B R M Vyas.   

Abstract

In vitro mutagen binding ability of human Lactobacillus rhamnosus 231 (Lr 231) was evaluated against acridine orange (AO), N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG), 2-amino-3, 8-dimethylimidazo-[4,5-f]-quinoxaline (MeIQx) and 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine (NPD). Binding of AO by Lr 231 is due to adsorption, thereby leading to removal of mutagen in solution and is instantaneous, pH- and concentration-dependent. Whereas, binding of MNNG and MeIQx by Lr 231 results into biotransformation leading to detoxification with subsequent loss of mutagenicity as determined by spectral analysis, thin layer chromatography and Ames test. Binding of mutagen by Lr 231 was dependent on culture age and optimum binding of AO, MNNG and MeIQx was observed to occur with 24 h old culture. Cells of Lr 231 were subjected to different chemical treatments prior to binding studies. Results indicated cell wall component such as cell wall polysaccharide, peptidoglycan, carbohydrates and proteins plays an important role in adsorption of AO, also involving hydrophilic and ionic interactions. Binding, biotransformation and detoxification of MNNG and MeIQx by Lr 231 was dependent on cell surface characteristics mainly involving carbohydrates, proteins, teichoic acid/lipoteichoic acid, hydrophobic interaction and presence of thiol group. L. rhamnosus 231 bound MNNG instantaneously. More than 96 (p < 0.01) and 70% (p < 0.05) cells remained viable after mutagen binding and various pretreatments respectively. This study shows Lr 231 exhibits ability to bind and detoxify potent mutagens, and this property can be useful in formulating fermented foods for removal of potent mutagens.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21777684     DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaerobe        ISSN: 1075-9964            Impact factor:   3.331


  5 in total

Review 1.  Antimutagenic Activity as a Criterion of Potential Probiotic Properties.

Authors:  Evgeniya V Prazdnova; Maria S Mazanko; Vladimir A Chistyakov; Anna A Bogdanova; Aleksandr G Refeld; Evgeniya Y Kharchenko; Michael L Chikindas
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 2.  Potential of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics for management of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Maya Raman; Padma Ambalam; Kanthi Kiran Kondepudi; Sheetal Pithva; Charmy Kothari; Arti T Patel; Ravi Kiran Purama; J M Dave; B R M Vyas
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2013-03-19

3.  Genotoxicity assessment of multispecies probiotics using reverse mutation, mammalian chromosomal aberration, and rodent micronucleus tests.

Authors:  Yi-Jen Chiu; Mun-Kit Nam; Yueh-Ting Tsai; Chun-Chi Huang; Cheng-Chih Tsai
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-10-23

4.  Safety evaluation of multiple strains of Lactobacillus plantarum and Pediococcus pentosaceus in Wistar rats based on the Ames test and a 28-day feeding study.

Authors:  Cheng-Chih Tsai; Sew-Fen Leu; Quan-Rong Huang; Lan-Chun Chou; Chun-Chih Huang
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-10-14

5.  Insight into the Draft Genome Sequence of Human Isolate Lactobacillus rhamnosus LR231, a Bacterium with Probiotic Potential.

Authors:  Padma Ambalam; Sheetal Pithva; Charmy Kothari; Ramesh Kothari; Nidhi Parmar; Neelam M Nathani; Prakash G Koringa; Chaitanya G Joshi; J M Dave; B R M Vyas
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2014-02-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.