| Literature DB >> 21777421 |
Ioannis U Isaias1, Giorgio Marotta, Gianni Pezzoli, Osama Sabri, Johannes Schwarz, Paolo Crenna, Joseph Classen, Paolo Cavallari.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies in animals suggest that the noradrenergic system arising from the locus coeruleus (LC) and dopaminergic pathways mutually influence each other. Little is known however, about the functional state of the LC in patients with Parkinson disease (PD).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21777421 PMCID: PMC3146819 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-88
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurol ISSN: 1471-2377 Impact factor: 2.474
Demographics and clinical data
| PD | HC | |
|---|---|---|
| Subjects N. (male/female) | 94 (67/27) | 15 (4/11)* |
| Age at SPECT | 60 (38 - 75) | 63 (51 - 74) |
| Age at motor symptoms onset | 57 (37 - 72) | |
| Disease duration | 3 (1 - 5) | |
| UPDRS motor score (part-III) [range 0 - 108] | 19 (8 - 56) | |
| Hoehn and Yahr stage [range 1 - 5] | 2 (1 - 2) | |
| L-Dopa in mg/day | 400 (0 - 850) | |
| LEDDs in mg/day | 250 (70 - 1200) | |
Data are reported as median and range (brackets). Age at SPECT, age at motor symptoms onset and disease duration are in years. All patients were evaluated with the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale motor part (UPDRS part III) in drugs-off state (i.e. after overnight withdrawal of specific drugs for PD, no patients was taking long-acting dopaminergic drugs). LEDDs were calculated as follow: 100 mg levodopa = 1.5 mg pramipexole = 6 mg ropinirole. * p = 0.0005.
Figure 1Overlay on a MRI showing the loss of FP-CIT binding bilaterally in the striatum (cluster of 6819 voxels, peaks at coordinates: 28 -8 -4 and at -31 -8 -4) (left in the figure) and increased FP-CIT binding in the locus coeruleus area (cluster of 37 voxels, peak at coordinates: 2 -36 -26) (right in the figure) of the whole group of PD patients compared to controls.
Binding values obtained with the analysis of volumes of interest
| Region of interest | PD | HC | p values |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN contralateral | 3.18 (1.2 - 3.84) | 5.27 (3.51 - 6.15) | < 0.0001 |
| CN ipsilateral | 3.29 (0.98 - 6.26) | 5.27 (3.51 - 6.6) | < 0.0001 |
| PT contralateral | 1.86 (0.65 - 4.72) | 4.83 (3.07 - 6.04) | < 0.0001 |
| PT ipsilateral | 1.97 (0.76 - 4.65) | 4.83 (3.62 - 6.37) | < 0.0001 |
| LC contralateral | 313.5 (81 - 663) | 131.43 (59 - 371) | 0.001 |
| LC ipsilateral | 321.17 (87 - 632) | 123.6 (38 - 354) | 0.0004 |
Data are reported as median and range (brackets). Average FP-CIT binding in the caudate nucleus (CN) and putamen (PT) was significantly reduced in subjects with PD subjects compared to HC. On the contrary, PD patients showed a significantly increased binding in the LC area (both right and left regions). We defined contralateral brain regions opposite to that of PD signs presentation. For HC, we referred to the right side as ipsilateral [15].
Figure 2Scatter plots and linear correlations of ipsilateral (left in the figure) and contralateral (right in the figure) FP-CIT binding values of the locus coeruleus and striatum (caudate nucleus and putamen). A statistically significant negative correlation was found between FP-CIT binding values in the locus coeruleus area and the corresponding striatum (both caudate nucleus and putamen).