OBJECTIVE: Individual work performance is differently conceptualized and operationalized in different disciplines. The aim of the current review was twofold: (1) identifying conceptual frameworks of individual work performance and (2) integrating these to reach a heuristic conceptual framework. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in medical, psychological, and management databases. Studies were selected independently by two researchers and included when they presented a conceptual framework of individual work performance. RESULTS: A total of 17 generic frameworks (applying across occupations) and 18 job-specific frameworks (applying to specific occupations) were identified. Dimensions frequently used to describe individual work performance were task performance, contextual performance, counterproductive work behavior, and adaptive performance. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the literature, a heuristic conceptual framework of individual work performance was proposed. This framework can serve as a theoretical basis for future research and practice.
OBJECTIVE: Individual work performance is differently conceptualized and operationalized in different disciplines. The aim of the current review was twofold: (1) identifying conceptual frameworks of individual work performance and (2) integrating these to reach a heuristic conceptual framework. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in medical, psychological, and management databases. Studies were selected independently by two researchers and included when they presented a conceptual framework of individual work performance. RESULTS: A total of 17 generic frameworks (applying across occupations) and 18 job-specific frameworks (applying to specific occupations) were identified. Dimensions frequently used to describe individual work performance were task performance, contextual performance, counterproductive work behavior, and adaptive performance. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the literature, a heuristic conceptual framework of individual work performance was proposed. This framework can serve as a theoretical basis for future research and practice.
Authors: Linda Koopmans; Jennifer K Coffeng; Claire M Bernaards; Cécile R L Boot; Vincent H Hildebrandt; Henrica C W de Vet; Allard J van der Beek Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-05-27 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Malgorzata W Kozusznik; Laurentiu Paul Maricutoiu; José M Peiró; Delia Mihaela Vîrgǎ; Aida Soriano; Carolina Mateo-Cecilia Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2019-02-20
Authors: José M Peiró; Malgorzata W Kozusznik; Isabel Rodríguez-Molina; Núria Tordera Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jennifer K Coffeng; Ingrid J M Hendriksen; Saskia F Duijts; Karin I Proper; Willem van Mechelen; Cécile R L Boot Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-08-02 Impact factor: 3.295