Literature DB >> 21775829

Phase I trials: from traditional to newer approaches part II.

Matthew Macaluso1, Michael Krams, Sheldon H Preskorn.   

Abstract

In the first part of this series, the authors discussed strengths and weaknesses of traditional phase I drug development involving single ascending dose studies followed by multiple ascending dose studies in healthy volunteers. They then discussed how these traditional designs are being challenged by the development of truly novel molecular compounds that are not derived from earlier drugs and how the extent and design of phase I studies will need to be expanded and altered to investigate these novel compounds. In this column, the authors focus in more detail on limitations of traditional phase I studies for investigating truly novel compounds and propose solutions to address these problems. Adaptive trial designs and biomarker endpoints are discussed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21775829     DOI: 10.1097/01.pra.0000400265.37666.4e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract        ISSN: 1527-4160            Impact factor:   1.325


  2 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Trial Designs in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Does One Design Fit All?

Authors:  Katharine A Nicholson; Merit E Cudkowicz; James D Berry
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  A theoretical framework for early human studies: uncertainty, intervention ensembles, and boundaries.

Authors:  Jonathan Kimmelman
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 2.279

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.