PURPOSE: Lim2 (MP20) is the second most abundant integral protein of lens fiber cell membranes. A comparative analysis was performed of wild-type and Lim2-deficient (Lim2(Gt/Gt)) mouse lenses, to better define the anatomic and physiologic roles of Lim2. METHODS: Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal microscopy were used to assess the contribution of Lim2 to lens tissue architecture. Differentiation-dependent changes in cytoskeletal composition were identified by mass spectrometry and immunoblot analysis. The effects on cell-cell communication were quantified using impedance analysis. RESULTS: Lim2-null lenses were grossly normal. At the cellular level, however, subtle structural alterations were evident. Confocal microscopy and SEM analysis revealed that cortical Lim2(Gt/Gt) fiber cells lacked the undulating morphology that characterized wild-type fiber cells. On SDS-PAGE analysis the composition of cortical fiber cells from wild-type and Lim2-null lenses appeared similar. However, marked disparities were evident in samples prepared from the lens core of the two genotypes. Several cytoskeletal proteins that were abundant in wild-type core fiber cells were diminished in the cores of Lim2(Gt/Gt) lenses. Electrophysiological measurements indicated a small decrease in the membrane potential of Lim2(Gt/Gt) lenses and a two-fold increase in the effective intracellular resistivity. In the lens core, this may have reflected decreased expression levels of the gap junction protein connexin 46 (Cx46). In contrast, increased resistivity in the outer cell layers of Lim2(Gt/Gt) lenses could not be attributed to decreased connexin expression and may reflect the absence of cell fusions in Lim2(Gt/Gt) lenses. CONCLUSIONS: Comparative analysis of wild-type and Lim2-deficient lenses has implicated Lim2 in maintenance of cytoskeletal integrity, cell morphology, and intercellular communication.
PURPOSE:Lim2 (MP20) is the second most abundant integral protein of lens fiber cell membranes. A comparative analysis was performed of wild-type and Lim2-deficient (Lim2(Gt/Gt)) mouse lenses, to better define the anatomic and physiologic roles of Lim2. METHODS: Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal microscopy were used to assess the contribution of Lim2 to lens tissue architecture. Differentiation-dependent changes in cytoskeletal composition were identified by mass spectrometry and immunoblot analysis. The effects on cell-cell communication were quantified using impedance analysis. RESULTS:Lim2-null lenses were grossly normal. At the cellular level, however, subtle structural alterations were evident. Confocal microscopy and SEM analysis revealed that cortical Lim2(Gt/Gt) fiber cells lacked the undulating morphology that characterized wild-type fiber cells. On SDS-PAGE analysis the composition of cortical fiber cells from wild-type and Lim2-null lenses appeared similar. However, marked disparities were evident in samples prepared from the lens core of the two genotypes. Several cytoskeletal proteins that were abundant in wild-type core fiber cells were diminished in the cores of Lim2(Gt/Gt) lenses. Electrophysiological measurements indicated a small decrease in the membrane potential of Lim2(Gt/Gt) lenses and a two-fold increase in the effective intracellular resistivity. In the lens core, this may have reflected decreased expression levels of the gap junction protein connexin 46 (Cx46). In contrast, increased resistivity in the outer cell layers of Lim2(Gt/Gt) lenses could not be attributed to decreased connexin expression and may reflect the absence of cell fusions in Lim2(Gt/Gt) lenses. CONCLUSIONS: Comparative analysis of wild-type and Lim2-deficient lenses has implicated Lim2 in maintenance of cytoskeletal integrity, cell morphology, and intercellular communication.
Authors: A Shiels; S Bassnett; K Varadaraj; R Mathias; K Al-Ghoul; J Kuszak; D Donoviel; S Lilleberg; G Friedrich; B Zambrowicz Journal: Physiol Genomics Date: 2001-12-21 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Junyuan Gao; Huan Wang; Xiurong Sun; Kulandaiappan Varadaraj; Leping Li; Thomas W White; Richard T Mathias Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: David A Scheiblin; Junyuan Gao; Jeffrey L Caplan; Vladimir N Simirskii; Kirk J Czymmek; Richard T Mathias; Melinda K Duncan Journal: Int J Biochem Cell Biol Date: 2014-03-04 Impact factor: 5.085
Authors: Catherine Cheng; Roberta B Nowak; Junyuan Gao; Xiurong Sun; Sondip K Biswas; Woo-Kuen Lo; Richard T Mathias; Velia M Fowler Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 4.249
Authors: Yilin Zhao; Phillip A Wilmarth; Catherine Cheng; Saima Limi; Velia M Fowler; Deyou Zheng; Larry L David; Ales Cvekl Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Bushra Irum; Shahid Y Khan; Muhammad Ali; Haiba Kaul; Firoz Kabir; Bushra Rauf; Fareeha Fatima; Raheela Nadeem; Arif O Khan; Saif Al Obaisi; Muhammad Asif Naeem; Idrees A Nasir; Shaheen N Khan; Tayyab Husnain; Sheikh Riazuddin; Javed Akram; Allen O Eghrari; S Amer Riazuddin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 3.240